| |
Soveveignty is the status of a person or group of persons having supreme and independent political authority. The concept of sovereignty is related to the concept of power: power over a territory, land and water, oil and minerals, as well as life on Earth. The United Nations (UN) cannot have normal attributes of sovereignty, which has been defined around a territory and population.
The Global Community has in fact been defined around a given territory, that territory being the planet as a whole, as well as a specific population, which is the Global Community. The issue here is not that of populations and boundary lines, but of the demarcation of power and control over the Earth that is the foremost formal attribute of sovereignty.
To speak of enforceable global law is to speak of world power. Global Parliament has the power to make the laws of the land and to make the rules for the territory of the Earth. Global Law has been and continue to be researched and developed for this purpose.
Today's problem is that democracy has not grounded itself. We have not extended democratic principles to the ownership and control of the Earth. The democratic global government as currently proposed by the Global Community, is grounded in equal rights to the Earth, and thus can create the world of peace and justice that we seek.
Conservation, restoration, and rational use of the Earth resources is about asking ourselves the question of "Who owns the Earth?" The large gap between rich and poor is conected to ownership and control of the planet's land and of all other Earth natural resources. This causes a fundamental threat to democracy. What has become of democracy? What has become "we the people?
We need to take a giant step forward to a new form of democracy. We, the Global Community, must now direct the wealth of the world towards the building of local-to-global economic democracies in order to meet the needs for food, shelter, healthcare, education, and employment for all.
The Global Community has proposed a new democratic mandate recognizing
that the gifts of nature - the land, oil, minerals, other natural resources
and a substantial amount of the monetary value accruing to their use -
rightly belong to the Global Community. The Earth is our birthright and
our common heritage. What we make from our mental and physical labor can
rightfully be held as individual property but the profit of the Earth should
be shared by all and for all.The unjust and inequitable ownership and control
of vast amounts of the land and of other natural resource wealth of our
planet is also a root cause of the great majority of local-to-global conflicts
and wars. Our current form of democratic governance is severely limited
in its capacity to negotiate peaceful means of resolving resource inequities
and disputes, whether over oil and other minerals or over land for housing
and livelihoods.
The Global Economic Model proposed by the Global Community is truly
the best response to the world.
Again here we will keep this dialogue within the "philosophy of life" framework of the Global Community, some called it the religion of the third millennium, others called it
the politics of the future generations now. Let us remind everyone the definition that has been guiding us throughout the previous dialogues:
The Global Economic Model stipulates as well that we, as human beings, are trustees and caretakers of all other life forms on Earth.
The Global Economic Model is global, as people are freed to move beyond borders and boundaries and claim the whole Earth as their birthplace.
How the Earth should be owned is the major economic question of this time. The world should be owned by the people living in it.
Unless a reformed or empowered Global Parliament is leading firmly upon the principle of equal rights for the Global Community, then the planet will be controlled by a handful of vested interests.
Land here, by definition, covers all naturally occurring resources like surface land, minerals deposits (gold, oil etc), water, electromagnetic spectrum, the trees, fish in the seas and rivers. It is unjust to treat land as private property. Land is not a product of labor. Everyone should therefore be given equal access to natural resources. The Global Economic Model proposes to make private property the product of labor. Common property is all what Nature offers. The Global Economic Model policy removes taxes from wages and increases taxes and user fees on common property.
The model eliminates subsidies that are environmentally or socially
harmful, and inequitable.
Motivation, rather than differential access to modern contraception is a major determinant of fertility. Individuals frequently respond
to scarcity by having fewer children, and to perceived improved economic opportunity by having more children.
Economic development does not cause family size to shrink; rather, at every point where serious economic opportunity beckons, family size preferences expand.
A) Foreign aid conveys to the recipients the perception of improving economic wellbeing, which is followed by an increase in the fertility of the recipients of the aid.
B) Migrations from regions of low economic opportunity to places of higher economic opportunity result in an increase in the fertility of the migrants that persists for a generation or two.
* societal family image,
* community rights,
* population health,
* poverty,
* scarcity of resources and drinking water, and the
* destruction of the global life-support systems and eco-systems of the planet.
* reproductive health services,
* education and economic opportunities,
* improved energy and natural resource technologies, and to
* healthyer models of consumption and the good life.
(a) a healthful, sustainable environment for every global community citizen,
(b) universal health care, publicly supported,
(c) education for all based upon individual capability,
(d) creative/productive employment for every global community citizen, and
(e) post-retirement security.
Global Health Ministry,
Global Education and Training Ministry, and
Global Social Services Ministry
Delay reproduction until later in life. Delaying reproduction is important in influencing population growth rates. Over a period of 60 years, if people delay reproduction until they are 30 years old, you would have only two generations, while if you do not delay reproduction you would have three generations (one generation every 20 years). Spread your children farther apart.
To have fewer children overall.
Government commitment to decreasing population growth. Create policies that help decreasing the number of children being born. Policies such as income tax deductions for dependent children and maternity and paternity leaves are essentially pronatalist and should be eliminated. Programs that are locally designed and that include information on family planning and access to contraceptives.
Educational programs that emphasize the connection between family planning and social good.
The vast disparities in reproductive health worldwide and the greater vulnerability of the poor to reproductive risk point to several steps all governments can take, with the support of other sectors, to improve the health of women and their families:
Give women more life choices. The low social and economic status of women and girls sets the stage for poor reproductive health.
Invest in reproductive health care.
Encourage delays in the onset of sexual activity and first births.
Help couples prevent and manage unwanted childbearing.
Ensure universal access to maternal health care.
Support new reproductive health technologies.
Increase efforts to address the HIV pandemic.
Involve communities in evaluating and implementing programs.
Develop partnerships with the private sector, policymakers and aid donors to broaden support for reproductive health.
Measure progress. Participate in Global Dialogue 2008 to help humanity find solutions. More and more young people on every continent want to start bearing children later in life and to have smaller families than at any time in history. Likewise, in greater proportions than ever, women and girls in particular want to go to school and to college, and they want to find fulfilling and well-paid employment. Helping people in every country obtain the information and services they need to put these ambitions into effect is all that can be done, and all that needs to be done, to bring world population growth to a stable landing this century.
A) Send us your own short version of the Global Constitution. It has to be developed from the actual longer version approved by Global Parliament.
B) Send us your own short version of the proposed Global Citizens Rights, Responsibility and Accountability Act It has to be developed from the actual longer version.
Global Dialogue 2008 Issues
Global Dialogue 2007 Issues
Global Dialogue 2006 Issues
Global Dialogue 2005 Issues
Global Dialogue 2004 Issues
Global Dialogue 2002 Issues
Global Dialogue 2000 Issues
Global Dialogue 2008 Issues # |
Read contents |
457 | Who owns the Earth? |
458 | The planet-Life-Soul of Humanity symbiotical relationship |
459 | To extend democratic principles down to the ownership and control of the earth. |
460 | The inequitable distribution of land ownership affects our society, our politics, our environment, our communities - and ultimately our sense of well-being as a people. |
461 | Global Economic Model proposed by the Global Community has first and foremost the well-being of all the people on this planet. It is based on the triple bottom line of social justice, restoration and protection of the environment, and the strength and stability to provide security in basic needs. |
462 | "A global community" is not about a piece of land you acquired by force or otherwise. One could think of a typical community that does not have to be bounded by a geographical or political border. It can be people living in many different locations all over the world. The Global Community is thus more fluid and dynamic. We need to let go the archaic ways of seeing a community as the street where we live and contained by a border. |
463 | A typical community may be what a group of people, together, wants it to be. It can be a group of people sharing with the same values. It can be a group of people with the same cultural background, or the same religious background. Or they can be people with totally different backgrounds and beliefs. The people making a global community may be living in many different locations on the planet. With today's communications it is easy to group people in this fashion. It can be a village, or two villages together where people have decided to unite as one community. The two villages may be found in different parts of the world. It can be a town, a city, or a nation. It can be two or more nations together. |
464 | Following this thinking we see land ownership is no longer a problem. The Earth and all its natural resources belong to all the "global communities" contained therein. A village, or a city is "a global community" and owns the land around its boundaries. Along with the Global Community, it has ownership of all natural resources within its boundaries. We will see in the Preview how this new system can work. |
465 | As mentioned above, land here, by definition, covers all naturally occurring resources like surface land, minerals deposits (gold, oil and gas etc), water, electromagnetic spectrum, the trees, fish in the seas and rivers. It is unjust to treat land as private property. Land is not a product of labor. Everyone should therefore be given equal access to such natural resources. |
466 | The Global Economic Model can achieve fairness in distribution, maximum efficiency in wealth production, and securing collective needs. The approach is based on the equal right of all to the land and to all other natural resources, and the right of the individual to the products of labor. The method requires to collect for the people the "ground rent" which means the value of land and of other natural resources, and to remove taxes on labor. |
467 | A condition of "ownership" of any particular landsite or natural resource is payment of the ground rent back to the community as a whole. Ground rent is the proper source of public finance for the collective needs of the community. Alternatively, ground rent can be redistributed by direct payment back to all individuals, much as a company returns dividends to its stockholders. |
468 | There is no need to forcefully confiscate land titles in order to secure the equal right of all to the Earth. With ground rent as the source of public finance the people as a whole become the "owner" and a title deed functions as a "lease" agreement. The community "allows" individual private use of sites on the condition that its fair rental value is paid to the community. If a particular land site is misused or abused, then the community must charge a higher rate to pay for damages and cost of restoration. Thus there is individual incentive for proper care of the Earth. |
469 | On the global level the Law of the Seas Covenant is an example of a ground rent basis for public needs as it has affirmed that ocean resources are the common heritage of all and a proper source of funding for global institutions. Water belongs to the earth and all species and is sacred to life therefore, the world’s water must be conserved, reclaimed and protected for all future generations and its natural patterns respected. |
470 | Water is a fundamental human right and a public trust to be guarded by all levels of government; therefore, it should not be commodified, privatized or traded for commercial purposes. These rights must be enshrined at all levels of government. In particular, an international treaty must ensure these principles are noncontrovertable. |
471 | All the Earth natural resources belong to the Global Community to be used, developed and conserved for the maximum benefit of the people and of all life. However, the challenges of global warming and non-renewable resource depletion dictates that oil and other non-renewable resource rents should be invested in socially and environmentally responsible ways and primarily in the needed transition to renewable energy technologies. The tax put on non-renewable resources in the world should be citizen empowered. |
472 | The Global Economic Model allows for the establishment of micro credit facilities, especially for farmers and women, to promote their access to forms of land tenure that facilitate access to and ownership of land.The Global Community should set up expert groups and begin the necessary intergovernmental negotiations towards establishing alternative revenue sources, which could include fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees levied on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on carbon content of fuels. |
473 | The goal of the Global Economic Model policy is to create a model of public finance which offers incentives for correct allocation of wealth amongst every global citizen. |
474 | The model makes a clear distinction between private property and common property. Private property is that which is created by labor. Common property is that which is provided by nature. The Global Economic Model policy removes taxes from wages and other private property and increases taxes and user fees on common property. Reducing taxes on labor increases purchasing capacity, reducing taxes on capital encourages efficiency. Shifting taxes to land and resources curbs speculation and private profiteering in our common property and is a practical way to conserve and fairly share the earth. |
475 | Only the Global Community can rightfully claim ownership of the Earth. |
476 | The theme of this Global Dialogue being "The planet-Life-Soul of Humanity symbiotical relationship", we will see how the relationship can help this generation of young people and the next ones to remain healthy. |
477 | The young people of to-day are interested in all the secret wisdom behind all the existing religions and sifting out the common truths. They seek the best of the best. They are aware of the Soul of Humanity and have established a spiritual symbiotical relationship with it, and thus with God. They seek the exaltation and merging of their Souls into one to gain strength, friendship, creativity, love and light. |
478 | The young people today are educated to understand a broad panorama of human truths ~ all those universal needs and rights every one shares. The Scale of Human and Earth Rights has become an inner truth and the benchmark of the millennium in how they see all values. The Earth Court of Justice brings security, peace and justice for all. They no longer fear the unknown as Justice is for everyone and is everywhere, a universal constant. The Global Justice Movement for all life is now driven by these young people. |
479 | Defining the parameters of sovereignty is a key component of the world order dialogue as it struggles to reach consensus regarding the boundaries and prerogatives of power. Soveveignty is the status of a person or group of persons having supreme and independent political authority. In dealing with the concept of sovereignty, we are dealing with the reality of power. It is power over a territory, over land and water, oil and minerals, as well as those life forms which have miraculously emerged out of the mud of the earth. The United Nations (UN) cannot by the nature of things have normal attributes of sovereignty, which has been defined around a territory and population, is not the same thing as a sovereign UN. |
480 | The Global Community has in fact been defined around a given territory, that territory being the planet as a whole, as well as a specific population, which is the Global Community. The issue here is not that of populations and boundary lines, but of the demarcation of power and control over the earth that is the foremost formal attribute of sovereignty. |
481 | The task of conservation, restoration, and rational use of the earth is vitally linked to the question of "Who owns the Earth?" The ever-widening gap between rich and poor, both within and among nations is a primary source of conflict and violence, a trigger mechanism for warfare. The root cause of this local to global maldistribution of wealth problem is the inequitable ownership and control of the planet's land and of all other Earth natural resources. |
482 | The impacts of our democracy are devastating when so few people would come to control so much of the earth, to the exclusion of the vast majority. The forces of our industrial economy have driven land values to such heights, to the benefit of landowners and bank lenders rather than wage earners. The property-in-land problem is the root dilemma of today's democracy. Having life and liberty without land rights breeds unhappiness, unemployment, wage slavery, suffering, militarization and even death. Democratic government as presently constituted, because it is not grounded and embedded in the principle of equal rights to the earth, cannot build a world of peace and justice. |
483 | Peace is not only the ability to resolve conflicts non-violently but to ascertain conditions of basic justice and fairness in human interactions. Force has most often predominated over fairness in the long history of human affairs. Territorial conflict has for millennium been a root cause of war. The price of peace has too often been the cost of continued injustice and conditions of economic servitude. Only Global Parliament has adequate legislation to overcome this problem. |
484 | What we are seeing is the emergence of a new geography of conflict - a global landscape in which competition over vital resources is becoming the governing principle behind the disposition and use of military power.... the result is a new strategic geography in which resource concentrations rather than political boundaries are the major defining features. |
485 | The primary social adjustment of the Global Community is a denial of justice. In allowing anyone to own the land on which and from which other people must live, we have given a person power in a degree which increases as material progress goes on. This way of doing things turns the blessings of material progress into a curse. We must find better ways of doing things, and quickly. The forces of concentration of wealth and power have nearly overpowered us. Why should people die of hunger and disease each year when there is enough to meet the basic needs of everyone? The obvious answer is that wealth is being controlled by a few privileged ones, and they usually are those whose footsteps regularly punctuate the corridors of power. These groups of people have come to see politics as a pathway to wealth acquisition. |
486 | We need to take a giant step forward to a new form of democracy. We, the Global Community, must now direct the wealth of the world towards the building of local-to-global economic democracies in order to meet the needs for food, shelter, healthcare, education, and employment for all. The task before us is that of building a global order based on the full honoring of our common humanity with profound recognition and respect for the dignity of each and every child, woman and man. |
487 | The Global Community has proposed a new democratic mandate recognizing that the gifts of nature - the land, oil, minerals, all other natural resources and a substantial amount of the monetary value accruing to their use - rightly belong to the Global Community. The earth is our birthright and our common heritage. What we make from our mental and physical labor can rightfully be held as individual property but the profit of the earth should be shared by all and for all.The unjust and inequitable ownership and control of vast amounts of the land and of other natural resource wealth of our planet is also a root cause of the great majority of local-to-global conflicts and wars. Our current form of democratic governance is severely limited in its capacity to negotiate peaceful means of resolving resource inequities and disputes, whether over oil and other minerals or over land for housing and livelihoods. |
488 | This criminal maldistribution of wealth must be stopped. We need to make some fundamental changes. We need political and economic systems based upon the human right to land and other natural resources. We need governance and land titles that can secure tenure and a genuinely free and fair market system for all. Land values must be delinked from the privatization category, the debt and private banking system delinked from its backing in land, and labor must be freed from taxation. |
489 | We are on the threshold of a global revolution, and we need to proceed with the non-violent approach. We need to build an economic democracy based firmly on this most basic principle - the earth belongs equally to everyone as a birthright. The earth is for all people to labor and live on and should never be the possession of any individual, corporation, society, or unfriendly government, any more than the air or water, or any other earth natural resources. An individual, company, or enterprise should hold no more than is required for their home and sustenance. All that is not used should be held for the free use of family to make homesteads, and to hold them as long as they are so occupied. |
490 | When it comes to property ownership it is the value of the improvement only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property...Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds. Landlords grow richer in their sleep without working, risking, or economizing. The increase in the value of land, arising as it does from the efforts of an entire community, should belong to the community and not to the individual who might hold title. Do what we may, we can accomplish nothing real and lasting until we secure to all the first of those equal and inalienable rights with which.... man is endowed by his creator - the equal and inalienable right to the use and benefit of natural opportunities, all Earth natural resources. |
491 | The land problem is the root cause of the wealth gap. The costs to the planet are high when wealth and power spiral into the hands of so few. Loss of species and topsoil, deteriorated air and water quality, global warming and climate change - the list of catastrophes and potential catastrophes grows each day. Those with clear vision frequently feel frustrated by lack of power and financing to remedy these problems. |
492 | Roman law developed the ownership concept which legitimized the accumulation of wealth by a few at the expense of the impoverishment of the many. The concentration of property in private hands began very early in Rome and was indeed based on the foundational and legitimizing idea of absolute and exclusive individual ownership in land. This was the same idea which would come to form the basis of the slave-owning, the feudal, and the capitalist economic systems successively. Modern civilization has not yet discarded this antiquated ownership concept, which was originally derived from ancient Rome. In fact, this is one of the main roots of the present global crisis in which the rich becomes richer and the poor becomes poorer. |
493 | We have at hand a powerful solution and a way to secure a world of peace and plenty. We need to constitute democratic governance on the firm foundation of equal rights to the land and resources of the earth, a democracy for all people which removes the burden of taxes from the backs of those who labor and instead directs government to collect the value of our common wealth for the benefit of all. A morally correct form of taxation may not lead to everlasting life, but it will promote and sustain the conditions for lives worth living on planet earth. |
494 | Democratic systems of governance have not given us equitable land tenure systems. In no instance historically did democratic governments procure the right to land as a human right. In no instance today do democratic governments affirm the equal rights for all to the land and natural resource base that sustains all life.This reality is important to keep in mind when considering how to implement truly equitable systems of land tenure today. |
495 | Whoever owns the land exerts power over those who are landless. We have not yet extended democratic principles down to the ownership and control of the earth. How can the young be expected to defend their homeland when they come home to find they have no stake in the land? The inequitable distribution of land ownership affects our society, our politics, our environment, our communities - and ultimately our sense of well-being as a people. The Global Economic Model will have first and foremost the well-being of all the people on this planet. It will be based on the triple bottom line of social justice, restoration and protection of the environment, and the strength and stability to provide security in basic needs. The ethics of the Global Economic Model will flow out of a profound perception that the rights of human beings and the rights of the planet are one and the same. |
496 | The Global Economic Model is based on respect and value all life on earth. It recognizes that we as human beings are trustees and caretakers of the many life forms that dwell here with us. The Global Economic Model extends the democratic mandate to solve the land problem by affirming the equal right of all people to the earth. It will have a balanced and just relationship of citizenry to government with enlightened public finance policy based on land and land rent for the people. Money will be issued and circulated as a service for the people as a whole rather than used as a mechanism for the exploitation of the many by the few. |
497 | The Global Economic Model is global, as people are freed to move beyond borders and boundaries and claim the whole earth as their birthplace. It is highly decentralized as well, with people living and producing for their basic human needs within the constraints and parameters of local ecological systems. The Global Economic Model is about a world that works for everyone, with plenty of time to expand our minds and elevate our spirits. |
498 | How the earth should be owned is the major economic question of this time. The world should be owned by the people living in it. The earth itself is the bottom line. The land is the source of all life and wealth. To survive, we must have somewhere to stand and to rest. But this absolute necessity for our very existence is nowhere guaranteed in our constitutional laws. Our Bill of Rights did not proclaim the human right to the earth. |
499 | We must grasp the injustice at the core of our present economic system. We need to understand how far we have strayed from reality and how we have been led into illusionary games of finance. Our treatment of the earth as a market commodity, just like a car or television, is the basic flaw in our economic ground rules. Treating the earth as simply a capital line item is the root cause of the ever-widening gap between those who have too much and those who have too little. |
500 | When land became a 'commodity' and lost its status as provider and sustainer of life, Western civilization began its history of subjugation and exploitation of the earth and earth based cultures. |
501 | Enormous sums are currently accruing as unearned income to a relatively few individuals, families and corporations who are holding large amounts of land, very valuable and well-located land, and other natural resources as their own exclusive private property. These enormous land values and resource rents are also accruing as unearned income to banks holding mortgages based on exploitative compound interest rates. Truly, when one must work so many years of ones life to pay off a mortgage, one productive hand is as if dead in terms of producing for oneself, as the labor of that hand pays the mortgage. For renters, there is not even equity ownership to look forward to after a life of labor. |
502 | One of the major functions of global governance is to grant clear titles to land and other property. Democratic governance as presently constituted has unfortunately not been greatly concerned about how the land was obtained in the first place. We need only reflect for a moment on the fact that in Canada, for example, land was acquired by the colonizers from the native peoples under the old Roman empire land laws of "dominium" - the legalization of land acquired by conquest and plunder. |
503 | Land tenure in the West, as far back as the Roman Empire, has been rooted in the legalization of title to land originally acquired by conquest and force. Democratic political rights have not given us democratic economic rights. We can exercise our right to free speech all day long but it in no way guarantees that we can have a secure place to sleep at night. |
504 | Confiscatory taxes on labor and productive capital should gradually be removed, as the value of earth natural resources becomes the proper source of funding for the community. |
505 | A significant proportion of the profit that has poured into the global banking system in the past several decades was not a product of honest labor, but was in fact a pool of funds generated from the ground rent of oil resources. These funds were loaned to numerous developing countries where they were frequently of benefit to the ruling elite rather than the people as a whole. However, the debt repayments have now fallen upon the middle class and poor citizens who neither voted for nor gained from the borrowed money. |
506 | Decreasing the tax on buildings gives property owners the incentive to build and to maintain and improve their properties. As the levy on land values is increased, land speculation and poor land utilization, an example being slum buildings and boarded up buildings, are discouraged. The signal thus sent to property holders is to either improve their properties or sell them to someone who can do so. Either way, labor and capital gain access to land to improve and augment the building stock. The tax incentives are harnessed correctly to encourage effort directed to the provisioning of housing and other basic human needs. |
507 | The high price of land means that the modern food and agriculture system provides no options for those who cannot find a paying job other than subsistence on charity or government supports. Those with minimum wage incomes are finding it increasingly difficult to afford decent housing. These social problems and pressures are bound to increase with the cut-off of welfare and other government subsidies to the poor. |
508 | Intensively managed small farms and well-designed ecological villages could produce a diverse range of food, fiber, livestock, and energy products for local markets. Bio-intensive farming methods depending on renewable energy sources can yield both social and environmental stability. The establishment of labor and bio-intensive small farming operations can be greatly furthered by land value tax policies which remove taxes on labor and productive capital while promoting affordable land access. |
509 | This Global Movement for land value taxation and natural resource rent for revenue can provide the basis for worldwide economic democracy. Freedom to live or work in any part of the globe would also further equality of entitlement to the planet, and provide a basis for the resolution of resource wars and territorial conflicts. There would be no more private profit as unearned income from earth natural resources. Instead, transparent and accountable resource agencies would collect resource rents and distribute those funds in public services or as direct citizen dividends. With fundamental democracy in rights to the earth firmly established through legal means and mandates, basic needs would be secured for all and the militarized national security state and its bloated budgets could wither away. |
510 | The solution to the problem of land speculation is land value taxation to be used for the benefit of the whole community. When the land speculator sees the irrationality of paying taxes on land he is not making productive use of, he will be forced to put it on the market for others to use, thus helping to unlock the economic activity of the unemployed and the economically disempowered. |
511 | Land value taxation can be the sole means of public finance. Under this policy, improvements on land will not be taxed, only the land value would be taxed. In other words, the financial needs of the community would be adequately taken care of out of the economic rent of land. When people are not taxed on their wages and the returns to capital, there would be no involuntary unemployment; and incomes would be good enough for everyone, such that poverty would be a historical curiosity. |
512 | Land value taxation policies shift taxes off of labor and productive capital and onto land and resources, thus collecting ground rent for the benefit of all rather than the profit of a few. Freeing labor from taxation assures maximum purchasing capacity. Collecting ground rent through land value recapture and land value taxation provides an equitable and sufficient source of public funds to finance infrastructure for water and sewage systems, transportation, education and other community services. Land also maintains affordability when it is freed from speculation and private profiteering. |
513 | Morally and ethically, a vast amount of the funds of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank represent a theft from the global commons. Under the common heritage principle, these funds would have been used to benefit the people of the world either by direct dividends or as interest free loans through a revolving loan fund type of system. |
514 | These oil theft loans made by the world financial institutions should be declared illegal and invalid. In the future, any other money loaned to governments by global financial institutions should be repaid from the ground rent of the indebted nations. Such repayments would therefore fall primarily upon those who are unjustly reaping the benefits of valuable land holdings rather than further burdening the struggling wage earners, small business owners, and the oppressed poor. |
515 | A condition of "ownership" of any particular landsite or natural resource is payment of the ground rent back to the community as a whole. Ground rent is the proper source of public finance for the collective needs of the community. Alternatively, ground rent can be redistributed by direct payment back to all individuals, much as a company returns dividends to its stockholders. |
516 | The exercise of both common and individual rights in land is essential to a society based on justice. But the rights of individuals in natural resources are limited by the just rights of the community. Denying the existence of common rights in land creates a condition of society wherein the exercise of individual rights becomes impossible for the great mass of the people. |
517 | All the Earth natural resources belong to the Global Community to be used, developed and conserved for the maximum benefit of the people and of all life. However, the challenges of global warming and non-renewable resource depletion dictates that oil and other non-renewable resource rents should be invested in socially and environmentally responsible ways and primarily in the needed transition to renewable energy technologies. The tax put on non-renewable resources in the world should be citizen empowered. |
518 | We have reached the deplorable circumstance where in large measure a very powerful few are in possession of the earth's resources, the land and all its riches, and all the franchises and other privileges that yield a return. These monopolistic positions are kept by a handful of men who are maintained virtually without taxation. |
519 | To speak of enforceable global law is to speak of world power. Global Parliament has the power to make the laws of the land and to make the rules for the territory of the earth. Global Law has been and continue to be researched and developed for this purpose. |
520 | The ownership of natural resources ultimately determines the social, the political and consequently the mental and physical condition of a people. Attaining an ethic of wise and careful stewardship of the Earth is likewise inseparable from the task of securing the well-being of individuals. The health of a person and the health of the Earth is interrelated. It is unlikely that environmental degradation will cease until the exploitation of the people is alleviated. The pressures upon those who are themselves exploited to exploit in turn each other and the environment is great. |
521 | We now have more national income and national wealth concentrated in fewer hands then we have had since the beginning of the twentieth century. This causes a fundamental threat to democracy. What will become of democracy? What will become of "we the people? What kind of life awaits our children and grandchildren if they have no jobs and no income to buy food or shelter? The primary social adjustment of the Global Community is a denial of justice. In allowing anyone to own the land on which and from which other people must live, we have given a person power in a degree which increases as material progress goes on. This way of doing things turns the blessings of material progress into a curse. We must find better ways of doing things, and quickly. The forces of concentration of wealth and power have nearly overpowered us. |
522 | We need to take a giant step forward to a new form of democracy. We, the Global Community, must now direct the wealth of the world towards the building of local-to-global economic democracies in order to meet the needs for food, shelter, healthcare, education, and employment for all. The task before us is that of building a global order based on the full honoring of our common humanity with profound recognition and respect for the dignity of each and every child, woman and man. |
523 | Global governance has not yet concerned itself with an important global principle question. This question concerns property rights in land - property rights in the earth itself. The fundamental question is, "Who Should Own the Earth?" The right to the Earth cannot be vulnerable to the whim of partisan politics. The right to the Earth must be vested in the people themselves, in a way that can be understood and monitored by the average individual. The answer is of course that everyone should own the earth on an equal basis as a birthright. The right to the earth, the right to the land and of all Earth natural resources is the most fundamental and basic human right - the equal right to earth. |
524 | The land problem has been around for the longest time. Why do people buy up large tracts of land near large towns and cities and other government projects without developing them? The objective is to wait for such a time when the land prices would go up so it could be sold at a great profit. This unearned increment or rise in land value is not as a result of anything the land owner has done. It is a socially created value and as such rightly belongs to the community. |
525 | Land speculation hampers development as land is held out of use. Those who need land are denied access. This evil strikes at every form of industrial activity. A manufacturer proposing to start a new industry will be forced to pay such a high price for land and this will hamper his competitive power in every market. In addition, in terms of settlement patterns, land speculation creates urban sprawl as people have to go beyond the land under speculation to acquire land to use or to build. |
526 | One of the major functions of global governance is to grant clear titles to land and other property. Democratic governance as presently constituted has unfortunately not been greatly concerned about how the land was obtained in the first place. We need only reflect for a moment on the fact that in Canada, for example, land was acquired by the colonizers from the native peoples under the old Roman empire land laws of "dominium" - the legalization of land acquired by conquest and plunder. |
527 | Land tenure in the West, as far back as the Roman Empire, has been rooted in the legalization of title to land originally acquired by conquest and force. Democratic political rights have not given us democratic economic rights. We can exercise our right to free speech all day long but it in no way guarantees that we can have a secure place to sleep at night. |
528 | We have at hand a powerful solution and a way to secure a world of peace and plenty. We need to constitute democratic governance on the firm foundation of equal rights to the land and resources of the earth, a democracy for all people which removes the burden of taxes from the backs of those who labor and instead directs government to collect the value of our common wealth for the benefit of all. A morally correct form of taxation may not lead to everlasting life, but it will promote and sustain the conditions for lives worth living on planet earth. |
529 | Democratic systems of governance have not given us equitable land tenure systems. In no instance historically did democratic governments procure the right to land as a human right. In no instance today do democratic governments affirm the equal rights for all to the land and natural resource base that sustains all life.This reality is important to keep in mind when considering how to implement truly equitable systems of land tenure today. |
530 | The intensive dimension of the land problem is what we confront as an economy develops under the current capitalist system. In our system a person makes money from land as a commodity and an investment. As development proceeds land values rise. Some few people are in positions to collect the increased land values, while other people have to borrow money from banks. Banks then collect an ever increasing ground rent - the profit from increased land value - as private profit. Investments are made, production increases, land speculation continues, and land values increase more rapidly than wages. Governments then increase taxes on middle class wages in order to pay for welfare programs for the poor. But soon workers are pressed down again to subsistence levels and the middle class gets angry or perhaps just depressed - if there is still a middle class remaining. The shining hope of progress has been dashed to pieces upon the hard rocks of wealth concentration. |
531 | The Global Economic Model is based on respect and value all life on earth. It recognizes that we as human beings are trustees and caretakers of the many life forms that dwell here with us. The Global Economic Model extends the democratic mandate to solve the land problem by affirming the equal right of all people to the earth. It will have a balanced and just relationship of citizenry to government with enlightened public finance policy based on land and land rent for the people. Money will be issued and circulated as a service for the people as a whole rather than used as a mechanism for the exploitation of the many by the few. |
532 | The Global Economic Model is global, as people are freed to move beyond borders and boundaries and claim the whole earth as their birthplace. It is highly decentralized as well, with people living and producing for their basic human needs within the constraints and parameters of local ecological systems. The Global Economic Model is about a world that works for everyone, with plenty of time to expand our minds and elevate our spirits. |
533 | How the earth should be owned is the major economic question of this time. The world should be owned by the people living in it. The earth itself is the bottom line. The land is the source of all life and wealth. To survive, we must have somewhere to stand and to rest. But this absolute necessity for our very existence is nowhere guaranteed in our constitutional laws. Our Bill of Rights did not proclaim the human right to the earth. |
534 | We must grasp the injustice at the core of our present economic system. We need to understand how far we have strayed from reality and how we have been led into illusionary games of finance. Our treatment of the earth as a market commodity, just like a car or television, is the basic flaw in our economic ground rules. Treating the earth as simply a capital line item is the root cause of the ever-widening gap between those who have too much and those who have too little. |
535 | When land became a 'commodity' and lost its status as provider and sustainer of life, Western civilization began its history of subjugation and exploitation of the earth and earth based cultures. |
536 | The Global Economic Model seeks to eliminate subsidies that are environmentally or socially harmful, unnecessary, or inequitable. Examples of such subsidies are: energy production, resource extraction, commerce and industry, agriculture and forestry, weapons of mass destruction and war industry. |
537 | The Global Economic Model aims to eliminate taxes on wages and earned income; productive and sustainable capital; sales, especially for basic necessities; and homes and other buildings. |
538 | The Global Economic Model also allows for an increase of taxes and fees on natural resource rents emissions into air, water, or soil; land sites according to land value; lands used for timber, grazing, mining; ocean and freshwater resources; electromagnetic or radio-frequency spectrum; satellite orbital zones; oil and minerals; and hydropower |
539 | The resolution of the dilemma of democracy can be found in a three-factor (land, labor, capital) macroeconomic approach. The products resulting from the interaction of land and labor are rightfully held as individual private property, while land and all other natural resources are recognized as the common heritage. |
540 | Once the human right to the earth is firmly established in the minds and policies of a democratic majority, land will no longer be taken by the few from the many either by the force of military might or by the mechanisms of the market. The market's ability to place value, combined with the efficiency of money as an exchange medium, results in a range of prices for land sites and natural resources. Those who simply own earth resources, contribute nothing as such to the productive process. Yet under the current private property ethic, they are in an advantageous position of power and can extract the ransom of a 'ground rent' from both labor and productive capital. |
541 | When we apply the common heritage principle to land and all other natural resources, then it follows that ground rent, which is a measure of natural resource value, must be treated as 'common property'. A way to affirm the equal right of all to the common heritage is to collect the ground rent for the benefit of the Global Community, a policy we call 'land value taxation'. |
542 | Confiscatory taxes on labor and productive capital should gradually be removed, as the value of earth natural resources becomes the proper source of funding for the community. |
543 | Roman law developed the ownership concept which legitimized the accumulation of wealth by a few at the expense of the impoverishment of the many. The concentration of property in private hands began very early in Rome and was indeed based on the foundational and legitimizing idea of absolute and exclusive individual ownership in land. This was the same idea which would come to form the basis of the slave-owning, the feudal, and the capitalist economic systems successively. Modern civilization has not yet discarded this antiquated ownership concept, which was originally derived from ancient Rome. In fact, this is one of the main roots of the present global crisis in which the rich becomes richer and the poor becomes poorer. |
544 | When Christianity became the state religion of the Roman empire, the early Christian teachings on land were overtaken by the Roman land laws of "dominium" - a legalization of property in land originally obtained by conquest and plunder. A largely corrupted Christianity, uprooted from its early teachings on land ownership, too often went hand in hand with the exploitation and degradation of centuries of colonial conquests. |
545 | When it comes to property ownership it is the value of the improvement only, and not the earth itself, that is individual property...Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds. Landlords grow richer in their sleep without working, risking, or economizing. The increase in the value of land, arising as it does from the efforts of an entire community, should belong to the community and not to the individual who might hold title. Do what we may, we can accomplish nothing real and lasting until we secure to all the first of those equal and inalienable rights with which.... man is endowed by his creator - the equal and inalienable right to the use and benefit of natural opportunities, all Earth natural resources. |
546 | The planet and all its resources of land, water, forests, minerals, the atmosphere, electro-magnetic frequencies, and even satellite orbits are the common heritage of all and must no longer be appropriated for the private profit of a few to the exclusion of the many. The Global Economic Model makes sure that the profits of the earth will benefit the people and the planet and secure an age of peace and plenty for all. |
547 | The incentive signals of the world's taxation systems currently promote waste, war, environmental damage, and the concentration of wealth. Approximating the composition of the world's $8 trillion tax pie reveals that 90% of taxes fall on work while only 5% is collected from environmentally damaging activities. A mere 3% of global tax revenues is captured from natural resource use and access fees. A modest global tax shift scenario would collect 20% from environmental damage, 15% from land use and resource royalties and cut environmentally harmful subsidies by 90%. This would free up an additional 10% of current revenues and permit a nearly one-third reduction on wages and capital to 50% of total global taxes. |
548 | While a clear title to land gives the security of use rights, under current private property regimes it also permits owners to speculate and profit from land as a market commodity. Thus we have also noted cases where landless people who have been given secure title sometimes quickly sell their land for immediate cash benefits. When they are unable to obtain employment to pay rent for housing, the cycle of poverty and landlessness begins anew. |
549 | Holding land as investment property and a way to accumulate wealth is actually maladaptive to a market economy. This tenure approach has been identified as a primary cause of the maldistribution of wealth problem which is rampant in capitalist systems. Land can not respond to supply and demand dynamics. There can be increasing demand for land but there is never a corresponding increase of supply as the supply of land was determined aeons ago by whatever unfathomable forces of the universe created it. |
550 | The commodification of land and land speculation inflates land values to the point where those who have only labor to contribute to the productive process must pay ever higher amounts for access to land for shelter. Taxation placed upon wage labor further decreases purchasing capacity. |
551 | Those with the most valuable land, and there is always the situation that some land is more valuable than others, have an advantage over those with less valuable land. Having a more advantageous position, the holders of the better lands see their wealth increase above and beyond the wealth of those with the poorer land and those who have no land at all. They then frequently use their greater wealth and power to acquire additional land. Soon land values rise more rapidly than wages. Workers must borrow to pay for land. They borrow from those who already have acquired surplus wealth and have deposited their funds in banks. Now the landless must pay interest in order to buy land. The people with surplus wealth become even richer. If the workers lose their jobs and cannot pay the mortgage, they must surrender their land to the banks. The commodified land tenure and land-backed mortgage banking system is the problem, not the solution. We see this problem throughout the world now, for instance in the unbridled power of big financial interests to force people off of lands for so-called development projects, such as big dams which displace millions of people and supply water and electricity primarily to a few wealthy landholders and businesses rather than to all on an equitable basis. Most of the people who are landless squatters around the urban centers in the developing world have been pushed off of their lands in rural areas, displaced from self-sufficient lives where they had direct access to land and resources to provide for their basic needs. This is the extensive dimension of the land problem - the fact that so few now control so much of the land and resources of the world. |
552 | As the taxation of land values, essentially a 'user fee' system, becomes an integral component of Earth
management, several things would have to happen at the same time:
1. land tenure will be based on fairness, not force, thus ameliorating territorial conflict, a root cause of war; 2. land resources can be equitably allocated; 3. the economic playing field is level; 4. a genuinely free market is encouraged; 5. the gap between the rich and poor narrows; and 6. the necessary collective activities of humanity are properly funded, which include peacekeeping, and the restoration and protection of the environment. |
553 | The Global Economic Model has put forward a system of finance based on principles of subsidiarity in terms of implementation. The ground rent of certain specific types of land and other natural resources can be collected by clearly delineated governing bodies from the local to the global level. Thus, cities and counties would draw their funding from the ground rent of surface lands; regional authorities would collect the ground rent of oil and minerals, and of other Earth natural resources, global governing agencies would be funded by a percentage from these two levels as well as that of deep sea resources, the electromagnetic spectrum, satellite orbital zones, and other global natural resources. |
554 | Sufficiently high user fees and pollution permits encourage business and industry to find more efficient and cost-effective controls. Pollution taxes function as pay-for-use fees for common heritage resources of land, water and air and make the tax system work for the people and the planet. Taxes also aim to eliminate numerous subsidies deemed no longer necessary, environmentally or socially harmful, or inequitable. |
555 | Property tax relief for agricultural land may increase the likelihood that it will attract those looking primarily for tax shelters and speculative investments. Such nonproductive incentives ultimately inflate land values overall, making it increasingly difficult for working farmers to access and maintain acreage for viable agricultural enterprise. |
556 | The high price of land means that the modern food and agriculture system provides no options for those who cannot find a paying job other than subsistence on charity or government supports. Those with minimum wage incomes are finding it increasingly difficult to afford decent housing. These social problems and pressures are bound to increase with the cut-off of welfare and other government subsidies to the poor. |
557 | This Global Movement for land value taxation and natural resource rent for revenue can provide the basis for worldwide economic democracy. Freedom to live or work in any part of the globe would also further equality of entitlement to the planet, and provide a basis for the resolution of resource wars and territorial conflicts. There would be no more private profit as unearned income from earth natural resources. Instead, transparent and accountable resource agencies would collect resource rents and distribute those funds in public services or as direct citizen dividends. With fundamental democracy in rights to the earth firmly established through legal means and mandates, basic needs would be secured for all and the militarized national security state and its bloated budgets could wither away. |
558 | Land value taxation policies shift taxes off of labor and productive capital and onto land and resources, thus collecting ground rent for the benefit of all rather than the profit of a few. Freeing labor from taxation assures maximum purchasing capacity. Collecting ground rent through land value recapture and land value taxation provides an equitable and sufficient source of public funds to finance infrastructure for water and sewage systems, transportation, education and other community services. Land also maintains affordability when it is freed from speculation and private profiteering. |
559 | While we are preparing to implement city and country wide land value taxation, we can model this approach through the Global Community Land Trust leases which secure title and tenure to the poor and landless while eliminating the problem of the commodification of land. A Global Community Land Trust (GCLT) is a legal not-for-profit landholding entity with a democratically elected board and transparent accounting procedures. A GCLT issued land lease clearly demarcates land boundaries and which individuals or groups are granted secure tenure and use rights to a particular parcel of land. Under a GCLT lease, land maintains affordability because there is no capacity for land speculation or profiteering. The Trust land cannot be sold so it does not have a purchase value for land users but does have a fair rental value, which in remote rural areas would be extremely low. With no selling price, only a fair lease fee, there is no need to borrow mortgage money for land purchase. This significantly lowers the cost of land for housing and other useful activities. |
560 | Nearly half of corporate profits comes from real estate related activities. A tax on land would thus fall heavily on corporate held lands which cannot escape from taxation via offshore accounts and other tax shelters. Labor would gain affordable access to land resources and capital. The products of labor on land would increasingly be owned and controlled by voluntary cooperative organizations. The removal of federal subsidies for agribusiness combined with affordable land access will give a great impetus to organic, sustainable agriculture. |
561 | A condition of the permission to extract natural resources or to use water or air would be the advanced payment of environmental security deposits. While heavy pollution taxes would drastically increase incentives for clean technologies, the environmental security deposits would only be returned if the land resource was left in an acceptably healthy condition. All the Earth natural resources belong to the Global Community to be used, developed and conserved for the maximum benefit of the people and of all life. However, the challenges of global warming and non-renewable resource depletion dictates that oil and other non-renewable resource rents should be invested in socially and environmentally responsible ways and primarily in the needed transition to renewable energy technologies. The tax put on non-renewable resources in the world should be citizen empowered. |
562 | Global commons are those universal values, principles, ideas, concepts, beliefs, truths we have all in common. They may also be symbiotical relationships. Global commons are the many reasons why humanity get together in times of uncertainty and distress. Wars and conflicts, environmental disasters, earthquakes and Tsunamis, are a few examples. Other times we get together in research and development, the exploration of space, development of new technologies, education, so many reasons for us all to meet and dialogue. The list goes on a long way. Today we are getting together to find new global commons that can help for the survival of humanity and all life on Earth. And so you are asked to participate in Global Dialogue 2008. |
563 | Most issues and aspects of global governance and Earth management are already being applied by the Global Community. But there is no agency powerful enough to protect life on Earth from those who care not about it. At best what we have is the Global Justice Movement for all life which has found a process for the establishment of justice amongst us all. What we have not done is the actual governing and managing of the planet as per the Global Constitution and Global Law. And that is our first priority now. |
Global Dialogue 2004 Issues # |
Read contents |
Issues 1 to 15 | Read |
Issues 16 to 31 | Read |
Issues 32 to 47 | Read |
Issues 48 to 59 | Read |
* global warmingNovember 2003 Newsletter: 3.1, 5.0
* Ozone layer
* wastes of all kind including nuclear and release of radiation
* climate change
* species of the fauna and flora becoming extinct
* losses of forest cover and of biological diversity
* the capacity for photosynthesis
* the water cycle
* food production systems
* genetic resources
* chemicals produced for human use and not found in nature and, eventually, reaching the environment with impacts on Earth's waters, soils, air, and ecology
Global Dialogue 2002 started August 1st, 2002 on Internet. The period August 17-22 was a time for Workshop Sessions to be held in Toronto and a time for summarizing results, and August 31 was the closing of the
Global Dialogue.
Global Dialogue 2002 was being held all over the planet. Our website was used to relate results to everyone so as to continue the discussions with everyone else on Earth.
Their were several Workshop Sessions on Earth Management and were listed here below and in the Proceedings.
Leaders of the Workshop Sessions were allowed to organize their sessions in their own town, university or home,
wherever , as long as they assumed all costs. Noone was being paid for their work and expenses. This was strictly on a volunteering basis and no money was available or will be available.
Leaders were also required to invite the public, experts and all
Participants to their Discussion Roundtables. This was a grassroots process and everyone was invited.
Leaders did not have to do this. They may have even up-out of this process at any time without penalties of any
kind. We are breaking grounds with the
Global Dialogue and in the ways international conferences may be held in the future. Noone has ever organized a
Global Dialogue having people (including the general public) from all over the planet participating interactively from their own town, community, universities or homes.
Daily results of the Workshop Sessions usually included comments and recommendations and were to be sent by email to
globalcommunity@telus.net
in the message area of the email.
All Participants were invited to send their comments and recommendations to the Leaders of their choice.
All Leaders were required to send an Opening Statement related to their Workshop Session. A Closing Statement was also being sent during the period August 17-22.
All Leaders were asked to contact (by email) paper submitters who have written Lead Papers within their respective Workshop Sessions and ask for comments and recommendations. During the period August 17-22, Leaders were asked to summarize results and email them as well.
A listing of the Workshop Sessions is shown here.
|