| |
The following table shows a summary of the Proceedings of the Global Dialogue as evaluated by the Global Community Assessment Centre (GCAC) | |
1. Each person has the right to have warmth, clean air, clean water, food and housing, along with access to a quality health and educational system.
2. Every person should be respected, equal, free and able to choose their own destiny.
3. Everyone should be able to fulfill their full emotional, intellectual and spiritual potential.
4. Every person must respect the rest of creation and take responsibility for preserving the environment including the fauna and flora, all of which are interdependent and share a divine origin with humanity.
5. The inalienable rights of the individual include the rights of life, liberty, access to productive property, truly free markets, and equal justice before the law.
6. Global Economic System that is fair for all.
7. It is the duty of democratic government to secure the results the people want from the transparent management of their public affairs, as far as such results do not infringe on the rights of the individual.
8. The Global Community Global Peace Movement is about educating ourselves to engage in personal diplomacy in another country. We are given opportunities to meet and listen to some of the leading authorities on such subjects as humanitarian and volunteerism, education, politics, historical, social and cultural perspectives, conflict management, teamwork, world affairs, community involvement, and religion.
9. Global Justice for all Life on the planet and it is about:
* establishing respect for human and Earth rights;
* implementing a global regulatory framework for capitals and corporations that emphasizes global corporate ethics, corporate social responsibility, protection of human and Earth rights, the environment, community and family aspects, safe working conditions, fair wages and sustainable consumption aspects;
* establishing freshwater and clean air as primordial human rights;
* practicing tolerance and living together in peace and harmony with one another as neighbours;
* promoting the economic and social advancement of all peoples;
* maintaining peace and security in the world by using negotiations and peaceful means;
* finding unity in diversity with all Life;
* establishing the respect for the life-support system of the planet;
* keeping Earth healthy, productive and hospitable for all people and living things, and
* applying the principle that when there is a need to find a solution to a problem or a concern, a sound solution would be to choose a measure or conduct an action, if possible, which causes reversible damage as opposed to a measure or an action causing an irreversible loss.
|
1. the policy response to the consequences of the global warming, and
2. the development of strategies to adapt to the consequences of the unavoidable climate change.
* every person on Earth has a right to a secure existence, and all states have an obligation to protect those rights;
* prevention of conflicts and wars; identification, anticipation, and resolving conflicts before they become armed confrontations. The Earth Court of Justice will help here.
* military force is not a legitimate political instrument; ban military action in all parts of the world; the war industry must be shelved;
* weapons of mass destruction are not legitimate instruments of national defence;
* eliminate all weapons of mass destruction from all nations and have inspectors verifying progress to that effect;
* all nations should sign and ratify the conventions to eliminate nuclear, chemical and biological weapons;
* the production and trade in arms should be listed as a criminal act against humanity; this global ministry will introduce a Convention on the curtailment of the arms trade, a provision for a mandatory Arms Register and the prohibition of the financing or subsidy of arms exports by governments;
* the development of military capabilities is a potential threat to the security of people and all life on Earth; the ministry will make the demilitarization of global politics a high priority;
* anticipating and managing crises before they escalate into armed conflicts and wars;
* maintaining the integrity of the environment and global life-support systems; ratifying the Kyoto Protocol is certainly a minimum requirement for the achievement of this goal;
* managing the environmental, economic, social, political and military conditions that threatened the security of people and all life on the planet;
* over the past decades and even now today, all Five Permanent Members of the United Nations Security Council (mostly the United States, Russia and Britain) were responsible for selling weapons and war equipment. These three nations are required to give back to the Global Community an amount of 8 trillion dollars (American) as a payment for the immense damage they have caused in the world. They have created a culture of violence throughout the world. They are nation bullies, nation predators. They are responsible for economic mismanagement, ethnic tensions, crimes, drug abuse, high unemployment, urban stress, worldwide poverty, and pressures on natural resources. Most conflicts in the world are direct legacies of cold war power politics, senseless politics. Other conflicts were caused by the end of the cold war and the collapse of old regimes. Other factors have combined to increase tension: religious, economical, political, and ethnic aspects. The dollar fine is to be administered by Global Parliament.
* global warming
* Ozone layer
* wastes of all kind including nuclear and release of radiation
* climate change
* species of the fauna and flora becoming extinct
* losses of forest cover and of biological diversity
* the capacity for photosynthesis
* the water cycle
* food production systems
* genetic resources
* chemicals produced for human use and not found in nature and, eventually, reaching the environment with impacts on Earth's waters, soils, air, and ecology
* the proliferation of conventional small arms
* the terrorizing of civilian populations by domestic groups
* gross violations of human and Earth rights
1. Legitimate leadership is built upon trust. Those who are led must largely believe that the leader is committed to integrity, honesty, and transparent inquiry into problems. The leader’s actions must align with his words
2. Legitimate leadership rests upon checks and balances, which are necessary to ensure power is not corrupted.
3. Legitimate leadership is an act of service. Those in power must show a primary interest in the good of the collective ahead of their self-interest. In this way, true leaders are mission-centered rather than self-centered.
4. Legitimate leadership empowers others appropriately rather than concentrating power disproportionately. In other words, true leaders produce more leaders and empower them as situations demand.
5. Legitimate leadership is visionary, carrying the torch of a possible future.
6. Legitimate leadership is willing to lead by example, including following a foundation of ethics, performing more than one’s share of work, and making sacrifices where appropriate.
7. Legitimate leadership is compassionately fierce when something undermines the good of the whole.
In a company this might mean the CEO fires a slacking employee. In a city, the police may jail a murderer. On a global level, this might even mean arresting those breaking global law.
1. Ban military action in all parts of the world;
2. Lead the way in creating legitimate power for Global Parliament, subjecting ourselves and multinational corporations to taxation that generates money for programs that are focused on world betterment and world problems. As a mark of our global leadership, we should commit a greater percentage of our resources to this effort than any other organization.
3. Hold ourselves to a high standard of compliance around global treaties that aim for collective benefit and the redress of economic, environmental, military, and political problems. Our adherence should be exemplary. Or, if we truly question the merit of a global accord, we should lead the way in creating agreements that even better serve the global interest rather than simply ignoring or undermining the existing attempts.
4. Exert strong global leadership on multinational solutions to pressing health, environmental, and other problems. We should propose innovative new solutions and show leadership in carrying them out, especially in areas such as clean energy development.
5. Take seriously the process of coming clean by exposing corporate interests in politics, lobbying by powerful organizations, subsidies of fringe military groups, etc. When our global government officials commit to be honest and transparent, a much deeper foundation of international trust will be built.
"Thou shall banish war as a solution to problems between communities. All Souls involved with war, directly or indirectly, shall face the Soul of Humanity to be purified. All Souls involved in the making of weapons, war product and equipment shall be facing the Soul of Humanity."
a) for everyone to manage Earth responsibly, and
b) about to reach the stars and spread Life throughout the universe and thus help other Souls to evolve and serve God in the best possible ways.
"I am the Soul of Humanity and of all that exists on Earth. My Temple is Earth! Not only are you thieves but you are murderers and killers. I know you all personally as your Souls are a part of me. They are my eyes. You cannot hide and you cannot run. I will not whip you out of my Temple as Jesus did. I have no need for that! You are destroying yourself. The only problem is that you are also responsible for the death of innocent and humble people. Life on Earth and the rest of humanity are threatened with extinction. This is insane! You have polluted air,water and land and you are still creating conflicts and wars. Most often the innocent and the humble people are hurt or killed. I want you to put down your guns, all of you. You will recycle all your weapons, war heads and any war equipment and products. You will stop destroying the ecosystem of the Earth right now. You will be a part of the grassroots process of the Global Community organization. You will help to implement Global Law. You will comply with Global Law. Earth shall be a place of prayer and shall become a Heaven for Souls as it is for God. If we, Souls and God, can see life as the most precious thing ever created, and we see Earth as Heaven, why cant'you? After your physical forms are dead, your Souls will separate from me and leave Earth forever.The purging and renewing of the Souls on Earth will last a millennium."
(John 3:36 "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him")All of you good Souls are my friends, and there is great joy and happiness in having you in Heaven on Earth. Your Soul and Spirit will also be given a chance to leave the matter of the Universe forever and enter God's Heaven.
(Matthew 1:21 "for He shall save his people from their sins")and will enter God's Heavens as promised by Jesus. Similarly, all the other Souls (those who live a life for Peace and are helping Earth, and also believed in Jesus), after your physical forms have died, will leave the matter of the Universe forever and will enter God's Heaven as promised by Jesus.
a) The Portal of the Global Civilization is being researched and developed by members of the Executive Council of Global Ministers and by the Global Community through the Global Dialogue processThose are the laws I urge you to follow faithfully.
b) Global Law: Earth and human rights, Statutes, Codes, Standards, Bills and Other Legislative Information. This WWW site is maintained by the Legislative Counsel of Global Parliament, pursuant to Earth Government Global Law, its legislation. Earth Government Global Law consists of 69 codes, covering various subject areas, the Global Constitution, Bills and Statutes. Information presented reflects laws currently in effect. All Earth Government Codes have been updated to include Statutes of year 2005. Researched and developed by the Global Community
c) Global Citizens Rights, Responsibility and Accountability Act. Researched and developed by the Global Community
d) Global Constitution. We call upon the national governments and legislatures of the world to ratify the Global Constitution for Earth Government and elect delegates to the House of the Global Governments Federation. Researched and developed by the Global Community
e) Agency of Global Police (AGP). Building global communities requires a mean to enforce global law that protects all life on Earth. Researched and developed by the Global Community
f) Global Protection Agency (GPA). Global Protection Agency will train and lead a global force, bypassing traditional peacekeeping and military bodies such as the United Nations and NATO. This is a great opportunity for globallateralism. Researched and developed by the Global Community
g) Global Community Earth Government: Politics and Justice without borders. Prosecuting criminals on the basis of universal jurisdiction regardless of a territorial or nationality nexus requires a solid commitment of political will from national governments and the Global Community. The Earth Court of Justice will hear cases involving crimes related to the global ministries. The Court will have a dual role: to settle in accordance with international law the legal disputes submitted to it by national governments, local communities, and in some special cases by corporations, non-government-organizations and citizens, and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized organs and agencies. Researched and developed by the Global Community
"Ye have heard that it hath been said, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth: but I say unto you, that ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also."
"Blessed are the peacemakers: for they shall be called the children of God." And he told Peter, "All they that take the sword shall perish with the sword."Christ has taught us to show mercy, to forgive enemies, to put up patiently with oppression, to return only good for evil and love for hatred and, therefore, war is inconsistent with the Spirit of Jesus Christ. This shows that a Christian should take no part in war, never, in any way. This all means that violence is futile in the long run. To respond to violence with violence is only perpetuating a vicious cycle of violence.
* global warming
* Ozone layer
* wastes of all kind including nuclear and release of radiation
* global pollution
* climate change
* species of the fauna and flora becoming extinct
* losses of forest cover and of biological diversity
* the capacity for photosynthesis
* the water cycle
* food production systems
* genetic resources
* chemicals produced for human use and not found in nature and, eventually, reaching the environment with impacts on Earth's waters, soils, air, and ecology
* ship Captains and owners dumping waste oils in oceans
* human activities of all kinds have disastrous impacts on the life-support systems: overfishing and bottom trawling, car and truck manufacturers using fossil fuels, etc.
Soveveignty is the status of a person or group of persons having supreme and independent political authority. The concept of sovereignty is related to the concept of power: power over a territory, land and water, oil and minerals, as well as life on Earth. The United Nations (UN) cannot have normal attributes of sovereignty, which has been defined around a territory and population.
The Global Community has in fact been defined around a given territory, that territory being the planet as a whole, as well as a specific population, which is the Global Community. The issue here is not that of populations and boundary lines, but of the demarcation of power and control over the Earth that is the foremost formal attribute of sovereignty.
To speak of enforceable global law is to speak of world power. Global Parliament has the power to make the laws of the land and to make the rules for the territory of the Earth. Global Law has been and continue to be researched and developed for this purpose.
Today's problem is that democracy has not grounded itself. We have not extended democratic principles to the ownership and control of the Earth. The democratic global government as currently proposed by the Global Community, is grounded in equal rights to the Earth, and thus can create the world of peace and justice that we seek.
Conservation, restoration, and rational use of the Earth resources is about asking ourselves the question of "Who owns the Earth?" The large gap between rich and poor is conected to ownership and control of the planet's land and of all other Earth natural resources. This causes a fundamental threat to democracy. What has become of democracy? What has become " we the people? "
We need to take a giant step forward to a new form of democracy. We, the Global Community, must now direct the wealth of the world towards the building of local-to-global economic democracies in order to meet the needs for food, shelter, healthcare, education, and employment for all.
The Global Community has proposed a new democratic mandate recognizing
that the gifts of nature - the land, oil, minerals, other natural resources
and a substantial amount of the monetary value accruing to their use -
rightly belong to the Global Community. The Earth is our birthright and
our common heritage. What we make from our mental and physical labor can
rightfully be held as individual property but the profit of the Earth should
be shared by all and for all.The unjust and inequitable ownership and control
of vast amounts of the land and of other natural resource wealth of our
planet is also a root cause of the great majority of local-to-global conflicts
and wars. Our current form of democratic governance is severely limited
in its capacity to negotiate peaceful means of resolving resource inequities
and disputes, whether over oil and other minerals or over land for housing
and livelihoods.
The Global Economic Model proposed by the Global Community is truly
the best response to the world.
Again here we will keep this dialogue within the "philosophy of life" framework of the Global Community, some called it the religion of the third millennium, others called it
the politics of the future generations now. Let us remind everyone the definition that has been guiding us throughout the previous dialogues:
The Global Economic Model stipulates as well that we, as human beings, are trustees and caretakers of all other life forms on Earth.
The Global Economic Model is global, as people are freed to move beyond borders and boundaries and claim the whole Earth as their birthplace.
How the Earth should be owned is the major economic question of this time. The world should be owned not just by the people living in it but by all life on Earth and the Soul of Life, the Soul of Humanity.
Unless a reformed or empowered Global Parliament is leading firmly upon the principle of equal rights for the Global Community, then the planet will be controlled by a handful of vested interests.
Land here, by definition, covers all naturally occurring resources like surface land, minerals deposits (gold, oil etc), water, electromagnetic spectrum, the trees, fish in the seas and rivers. It is unjust to treat land as private property. Land is not a product of labor. Everyone should therefore be given equal access to natural resources. The Global Economic Model proposes to make private property the product of labor. Common property is all what Nature offers. The Global Economic Model policy removes taxes from wages and increases taxes and user fees on common property.
The model eliminates subsidies that are environmentally or socially
harmful, and inequitable.
Defining the parameters of sovereignty is a key component of the world order dialogue as it struggles to reach consensus regarding the boundaries and prerogatives of power. Soveveignty is the status of a person or group of persons having supreme and independent political authority. In dealing with the concept of sovereignty, we are dealing with the reality of power. It is power over a territory, over land and water, oil and minerals, as well as those life forms which have miraculously emerged out of the mud of the Earth. The United Nations (UN) cannot by the nature of things have normal attributes of sovereignty, which has been defined around a territory and population, is not the same thing as a sovereign UN.
To speak of enforceable global law is to speak of world power.
Today's problem is that democracy has not grounded itself. We have not yet extended democratic principles down to the ownership and control of the Earth.
The task of conservation, restoration, and rational use of the Earth is vitally linked to the question of "Who owns the Earth?" The ever-widening gap between rich and poor, both within and among nations is a primary source of conflict and violence, a trigger mechanism for warfare. The root cause of this local to global maldistribution of wealth problem is the inequitable ownership and control of the planet's land and of all other Earth natural resources.
The ownership of natural resources ultimately determines the social, the political and consequently the mental and physical condition of a people. Attaining an ethic of wise and careful stewardship of the Earth is likewise inseparable from the task of securing the well-being of individuals. The health of a person and the health of the Earth is interrelated. It is unlikely that environmental degradation will cease until the exploitation of the people is alleviated. The pressures upon those who are themselves exploited to exploit in turn each other and the environment is great.
We now have more national income and national wealth concentrated in fewer hands then we have had since the beginning of the twentieth century. This causes a fundamental threat to democracy. What will become of democracy? What will become of "we the people? What kind of life awaits our children and grandchildren if they have no jobs and no income to buy food or shelter? The primary social adjustment is a denial of justice. In allowing anyone to own the land on which and from which other people must live, we have given a person power in a degree which increases as material progress goes on. This way of doing things turns the blessings of material progress into a curse. We must find better ways of doing things, and quickly. The forces of concentration of wealth and power have nearly overpowered us. Why should people die of hunger and disease each year when there is enough to meet the basic needs of everyone? The obvious answer is that wealth is being controlled by a few privileged ones, and they usually are those whose footsteps regularly punctuate the corridors of power. These groups of people have come to see politics as a pathway to wealth acquisition.
We need to take a giant step forward to a new form of democracy. We must now direct the wealth of the world towards the
building of local-to-global economic democracies in order to meet the needs
for food, shelter, healthcare, education, and employment for all. The task
before us is that of building a global order based on the full honoring
of our common humanity with profound recognition and respect for the dignity
of each and every child, woman and man.
The Earth is our birthright and
our common heritage. What we make from our mental and physical labor can
rightfully be held as individual property but the profit of the Earth should
be shared by all and for all.The unjust and inequitable ownership and control
of vast amounts of the land and of other natural resource wealth of our
planet is also a root cause of the great majority of local-to-global conflicts
and wars. Our current form of democratic governance is severely limited
in its capacity to negotiate peaceful means of resolving resource inequities
and disputes, whether over oil and other minerals or over land for housing
and livelihoods.
This criminal maldistribution of wealth must be stopped. We need to make some fundamental changes. We need political and economic systems based upon the human right to land and other natural resources. We need governance and land titles that can secure tenure and a genuinely free and fair market system for all. Land values must be delinked from the privatization category, the debt and private banking system delinked from its backing in land, and labor must be freed from taxation.
Every national government must show a commitment to promoting the provision of an adequate supply of land in the context of sustainable land-use policies. While recognizing the existence of different national laws and/or systems of land tenure, governments at the appropriate levels, including local authorities, should nevertheless strive to remove all possible obstacles that may hamper equitable access to land and ensure that equal rights of women and men related to land and property are protected under the law.
Truly, we are on the threshold of a global revolution, and we need to proceed with the non-violent approach. We need to build an economic democracy based firmly on this most basic principle - the Earth belongs equally to everyone as a birthright. The Earth is for all people to labor and live on and should never be the possession of any individual, corporation, society, or unfriendly government, any more than the air or water, or any other Earth natural resources. An individual, company, or enterprise should hold no more than is required for their home and sustenance. All that is not used should be held for the free use of family to make homesteads, and to hold them as long as they are so occupied.
The impacts of our democracy are devastating when so few people would come to control so much of the Earth, to the exclusion of the vast majority. The forces of our industrial economy have driven land values to such heights, to the benefit of landowners and bank lenders rather than wage earners. The property-in-land problem is the root dilemma of today's democracy. Having life and liberty without land rights breeds unhappiness, unemployment, wage slavery, suffering, militarization and even death. Democratic government as presently constituted, because it is not grounded and embedded in the principle of equal rights to the Earth, cannot build a world of peace and justice. Peace is not only the ability to resolve conflicts non-violently but to ascertain conditions of basic justice and fairness in human interactions. Force has most often predominated over fairness in the long history of human affairs. Territorial conflict has for millennium been a root cause of war. The price of peace has too often been the cost of continued injustice and conditions of economic servitude. Only Global Parliament has adequate legislation to overcome this problem.
Most every war throughout all the ages has been fought over land, and other Earth natural resources. During the past one hundred years, governments have been destabilized and wars have been fought over land and natural resources in Indonesia, Viet Nam, Iran, Iraq, Nigeria, Chile, El Salvador, Nicaragua, Guatemala and many other small countries. We have seen oil conflicts in the Persian Gulf, the Caspian Sea Basin, Nigeria and the South China Sea and water conflicts in the Nile Basin, the Jordan, Tigris-Euphrates and Indus River Basins. Internal wars have been or are being fought over minerals and timber in Angola, Sierra Leone, Liberia, the Congo, and Bougainville/Papua New Guinea, and Borneo. Brazil and Indonesia. Hostilities over valuable gems, minerals and timber are under way in Angola, Brazil, Burma, Cambodia, Columbia, Congo, Indonesia, Liberia and the Philippines. What we are seeing is the emergence of a new geography of conflict - a global landscape in which competition over vital resources is becoming the governing principle behind the disposition and use of military power.... the result is a new strategic geography in which resource concentrations rather than political boundaries are the major defining features.
Each day we hand over astronomical amounts of money to build weapons of mass destruction, fuel dangerous, dirty and polluting technologies, and subsidize huge conglomerates which concentrate the wealth of the world for the power of an elite few.
What if we, instead, were to find a way to share the Earth? What if
we, instead, were to find a way to end tax tyranny and align our visions
and values with how we finance government? The way forward is coming into
sight. The Global Economic Model proposed by the Global Community is truly
the best response to the world.
Whoever owns the land exerts power over those who are landless. We
have not yet extended democratic principles down to the ownership and control
of the Earth. How can the young be expected to defend their homeland when
they come home to find they have no stake in the land? The inequitable
distribution of land ownership affects our society, our politics, our environment,
our communities - and ultimately our sense of well-being as a people. A global economic model will have first and foremost the well-being of all
the people on this planet. It will be based on the triple bottom line of
social justice, restoration and protection of the environment, and the
strength and stability to provide security in basic needs. The ethics of
the global economic model will flow out of a profound perception that the
rights of human beings and the rights of the planet are one and the same.
A global economic model is based on respect and value all life on Earth. It recognizes that we as human beings are trustees and caretakers of the many life forms that dwell here with us. A global economic model extends the democratic mandate to solve the land problem by affirming the equal right of all people to the Earth. It will have a balanced and just relationship of citizenry to government with enlightened public finance policy based on land and land rent for the people. Money will be issued and circulated as a service for the people as a whole rather than used as a mechanism for the exploitation of the many by the few.
A global economic model is global, as people are freed to move beyond borders and boundaries and claim the whole Earth as their birthplace. It is highly decentralized as well, with people living and producing for their basic human needs within the constraints and parameters of local ecological systems. A global economic model is about a world that works for everyone, with plenty of time to expand our minds and elevate our spirits.
How the Earth should be owned is the major economic question of this time. The world should be owned by the people living in it. The Earth itself is the bottom line. The land is the source of all life and wealth. To survive, we must have somewhere to stand and to rest. But this absolute necessity for our very existence is nowhere guaranteed in our constitutional laws. Our Bill of Rights did not proclaim the human right to the Earth.
We must grasp the injustice at the core of our present economic system. We need to understand how far we have strayed from reality and how we have been led into illusionary games of finance. Our treatment of the Earth as a market commodity, just like a car or television, is the basic flaw in our economic ground rules. Treating the Earth as simply a capital line item is the root cause of the ever-widening gap between those who have too much and those who have too little.
When land became a 'commodity' and lost its status as provider and sustainer of life, Western civilization began its history of subjugation and exploitation of the Earth and Earth based cultures.
A significant proportion of the profit that has poured into the global banking system in the past several decades was not a product of honest labor, but was in fact a pool of funds generated from the ground rent of oil resources. These funds were loaned to numerous developing countries where they were frequently of benefit to the ruling elite rather than the people as a whole. However, the debt repayments have now fallen upon the middle class and poor citizens who neither voted for nor gained from the borrowed money.
Morally and ethically, a vast amount of the funds of the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank represent a theft from the global commons. Under the common heritage principle, these funds would have been used to benefit the people of the world either by direct dividends or as interest free loans through a revolving loan fund type of system.
These oil theft loans made by the world financial institutions should therefore be declared illegal and invalid. In the future, any other money loaned to governments by global financial institutions should be repaid from the ground rent of the indebted nations. Such repayments would therefore fall primarily upon those who are unjustly reaping the benefits of valuable land holdings rather than further burdening the struggling wage earners, small business owners, and the oppressed poor.
To have peace on Earth, we must work to create the conditions for peace in our own towns and cities. If we would revitalize our urban habitats by improving schools and libraries, creating livelihoods and affordable housing, and maintaining safe and beautiful parks and playgrounds, then we must urge council members to collect the ground rent of land to finance public services and greatly reduce or eliminate most other forms of taxation.
If the politics of the planet are to be based on fairness rather than on force, then equal rights to Earth must become the guiding principle, the sovereign, supreme rule. The fundamental human right which now needs to be affirmed is this - the Earth is the birthright of all people.
Of the three factors of production - land, labor and capital - land is the source of all wealth without which man cannot exist. Today's neo-liberal economists have succeeded to treating land as private property thus giving it the status of a commodity, tradable within an expanding market system.
Land here, by definition, covers all naturally occurring resources like surface land, minerals deposits (gold, oil etc), water, electromagnetic spectrum, the trees, fish in the seas and rivers. It is unjust to treat land as private property. Land is not a product of labor. Everyone should therefore be given equal access to such natural resources.
A global economic model can achieve fairness in distribution, maximum efficiency in wealth production, and securing collective needs. The approach is based on the equal right of all to the land and to all other natural resources, and the right of the individual to the products of labor. The method requires to collect for the people the "ground rent" which means the value of land and of other natural resources, and to remove taxes on labor.
A condition of "ownership" of any particular landsite or natural resource is payment of the ground rent back to the community as a whole. Ground rent is the proper source of public finance for the collective needs of the community. Alternatively, ground rent can be redistributed by direct payment back to all individuals, much as a company returns dividends to its stockholders.
It is not necessary for each person to own land outright in order thereby to secure their fair share of the Earth. Persons "owning" land or resource rights would profit through their labor, which is untaxed, not through the privilege of exclusive ownership. If they have a better located land site or richer mineral lands, they pay higher ground rents back to the community, thus equalizing results of labor applied to greater or lesser valuable natural resources.
There is no need to forcefully confiscate land titles in order to secure the equal right of all to the Earth. With ground rent as the source of public finance the people as a whole become the "owner" and a title deed functions as a "lease" agreement. The community "allows" individual private use of sites on the condition that its fair rental value is paid to the community. If a particular land site is misused or abused, then the community must charge a higher rate to pay for damages and cost of restoration. Thus there is individual incentive for proper care of the Earth.
Taxes from any other source raised for whatever worthy goal or peace or environmental needs, food, jobs or medicine, ultimately depress wages and capital formation necessary to secure basic human needs while the inevitable increase in land values is pocketed by the few who own the land.
On the global level the Law of the Seas Covenant is an example of a ground rent basis for public needs as it has affirmed that ocean resources are the common heritage of all and a proper source of funding for global institutions.
There are two practical ways that we can democratize land rights. One is fundamental tax reform. Shifting taxes off of labor would increase purchasing capacity; eliminating taxes on buildings would encourage construction and maintenance. What to tax instead? Significantly increasing the tax rate on land value discourages land speculation and gives a strong stimulus for these landsites to be put to good use for housing and other productive needs. Natural resource taxes function as user fees and ensure fair and efficient use of the Earth natural resources. The other way to secure democratic rights to the Earth is by making land available to individuals and groups who wish to live in ecologically sustainable villages and farms. Community land trusts can hold title to such lands while the buildings and other improvements can be privately owned. With land access, involuntary unemployment would be ended since the right to use land is the essential prerequisite to the right to work. Money available through non-profit grants and government transfer payments can be used as revolving funds for micro-loans for the purchase of building materials for the new ecovillages.
The solution to the problem of land speculation is land value taxation to be used for the benefit of the whole community. When the land speculator sees the irrationality of paying taxes on land he is not making productive use of, he will be forced to put it on the market for others to use, thus helping to unlock the economic activity of the unemployed and the economically disempowered.
Land value taxation can be the sole means of public finance. Under this policy, improvements on land will not be taxed, only the land value would be taxed. In other words, the financial needs of the community would be adequately taken care of out of the economic rent of land. When people are not taxed on their wages and the returns to capital, there would be no involuntary unemployment; and incomes would be good enough for everyone, such that poverty would be a historical curiosity.
The exercise of both common and individual rights in land is essential to a society based on justice. But the rights of individuals in natural resources are limited by the just rights of the community. Denying the existence of common rights in land creates a condition of society wherein the exercise of individual rights becomes impossible for the great mass of the people.
A global economic model allows for the establishment of micro credit facilities, especially for farmers and women, to promote their access to forms of land tenure that facilitate access to and ownership of land.The Global Community should set up expert groups and begin the necessary intergovernmental negotiations towards establishing alternative revenue sources, which could include fees for the commercial use of the oceans, fees for airplane use of the skies, fees for use of the electromagnetic spectrum, fees levied on foreign exchange transactions, and a tax on carbon content of fuels.
The goal of a global economic model policy is to create a model of public finance which strengthens and maximize incentives for:
Fair distribution of wealthThe model makes a clear distinction between private property and common property. Private property is that which is created by labor. Common property is that which is provided by nature. A global economic model policy removes taxes from wages and other private property and increases taxes and user fees on common property. Reducing taxes on labor increases purchasing capacity, reducing taxes on capital encourages efficiency. Shifting taxes to land and resources curbs speculation and private profiteering in our common property and is a practical way to conserve and fairly share the Earth.
Environmental protection
Basic needs production
Provision of adequate government services
Peaceful resolution of territorial conflicts
The model seeks to eliminate subsidies that are environmentally or socially harmful, unnecessary, or inequitable. Examples of such subsidies are:
Energy productionThe model aims to eliminate taxes on:
Resource extraction
Commerce and industry
Agriculture and forestry
Weapons of mass destruction and war industry
Wages and earned incomeDecreasing taxes on buildings, which encourages improvements and renovations, and increasing taxes on land values to discourage land speculation, encourage good site use, and furthers access to more affordable land. Shifting the tax burden from buildings to land values promotes a more efficient use of urban infrastructure and recaptures the values that society creates. The benefits of development can be broadly shared when housing maintains affordability and public coffers are solvent.
Productive and sustainable capital
Sales, especially for basic necessities
Homes and other buildings
The model also allows for an increase of taxes and fees on natural resource rents:
Emissions into air, water, or soil
Land sites according to land value
Lands used for timber, grazing, mining
Ocean and freshwater resources
Electromagnetic or radio-frequency spectrum
Satellite orbital zones
Oil and minerals
Hydropower
All the bloody wars this world has experienced have been over the scramble for oil, natural gas, minerals, fishing resources, farm lands, and of other natural resources. We have seen how local communities in remote villages in Nigeria and other parts of Africa have wiped out rival communities in bloody conflicts over fishing rights, grazing rights as well as farming rights.
The land problem has been around for the longest time. Why do people buy up large tracts of land near large towns and cities and other government projects without developing them? The objective is to wait for such a time when the land prices would go up so it could be sold at a great profit. This unearned increment or rise in land value is not as a result of anything the land owner has done. It is a socially created value and as such rightly belongs to the community.
Land speculation hampers development as land is held out of use. Those who need land are denied access. This evil strikes at every form of industrial activity. A manufacturer proposing to start a new industry will be forced to pay such a high price for land and this will hamper his competitive power in every market. In addition, in terms of settlement patterns, land speculation creates urban sprawl as people have to go beyond the land under speculation to acquire land to use or to build.
Enormous sums are currently accruing as unearned income to a relatively few individuals, families and corporations who are holding large amounts of land, very valuable and well-located land, and other natural resources as their own exclusive private property. These enormous land values and resource rents are also accruing as unearned income to banks holding mortgages based on exploitative compound interest rates. Truly, when one must work so many years of ones life to pay off a mortgage, one productive hand is as if dead in terms of producing for oneself, as the labor of that hand pays the mortgage. For renters, there is not even equity ownership to look forward to after a life of labor.
One of the major functions of global governance is to grant clear titles to land and other property. Democratic governance as presently constituted has unfortunately not been greatly concerned about how the land was obtained in the first place. We need only reflect for a moment on the fact that in Canada, for example, land was acquired by the colonizers from the native peoples under the old Roman empire land laws of "dominium" - the legalization of land acquired by conquest and plunder.
Land tenure in the West, as far back as the Roman Empire, has been rooted in the legalization of title to land originally acquired by conquest and force. Democratic political rights have not given us democratic economic rights. We can exercise our right to free speech all day long but it in no way guarantees that we can have a secure place to sleep at night.
We have at hand a powerful solution and a way to secure a world of peace and plenty. We need to constitute democratic governance on the firm foundation of equal rights to the land and resources of the Earth, a democracy for all people which removes the burden of taxes from the backs of those who labor and instead directs government to collect the value of our common wealth for the benefit of all. A morally correct form of taxation may not lead to everlasting life, but it will promote and sustain the conditions for lives worth living on planet Earth.
Democratic systems of governance have not given us equitable land tenure systems. In no instance historically did democratic governments procure the right to land as a human right. In no instance today do democratic governments affirm the equal rights for all to the land and natural resource base that sustains all life.This reality is important to keep in mind when considering how to implement truly equitable systems of land tenure today.
The intensive dimension of the land problem is what we confront as an economy develops under the current capitalist system. In our system a person makes money from land as a commodity and an investment. As development proceeds land values rise. Some few people are in positions to collect the increased land values, while other people have to borrow money from banks. Banks then collect an ever increasing ground rent - the profit from increased land value - as private profit. Investments are made, production increases, land speculation continues, and land values increase more rapidly than wages. Governments then increase taxes on middle class wages in order to pay for welfare programs for the poor. But soon workers are pressed down again to subsistence levels and the middle class gets angry or perhaps just depressed - if there is still a middle class remaining. The shining hope of progress has been dashed to pieces upon the hard rocks of wealth concentration.
Once the human right to the Earth is firmly established in the minds and policies of a democratic majority, land will no longer be taken by the few from the many either by the force of military might or by the mechanisms of the market. The market's ability to place value, combined with the efficiency of money as an exchange medium, results in a range of prices for land sites and natural resources. Those who simply own Earth resources, contribute nothing as such to the productive process. Yet under the current private property ethic, they are in an advantageous position of power and can extract the ransom of a 'ground rent' from both labor and productive capital.
But if we now apply the common heritage principle to land and all other natural resources, then it follows that ground rent, which is a measure of natural resource value, must be treated as 'common property'. A way to affirm the equal right of all to the common heritage is to collect the ground rent for the benefit of the Global Community, a policy we call 'land value taxation'.
Confiscatory taxes on labor and productive capital should gradually be removed, as the value of Earth natural resources becomes the proper source of funding for the community.
The land problem is the root cause of the wealth gap. The costs to the planet are high when wealth and power spiral into the hands of so few. Loss of species and topsoil, deteriorated air and water quality, global warming and climate change - the list of catastrophes and potential catastrophes grows each day. Those with clear vision frequently feel frustrated by lack of power and financing to remedy these problems.
Roman law developed the ownership concept which legitimized the accumulation of wealth by a few at the expense of the impoverishment of the many. The concentration of property in private hands began very early in Rome and was indeed based on the foundational and legitimizing idea of absolute and exclusive individual ownership in land. This was the same idea which would come to form the basis of the slave-owning, the feudal, and the capitalist economic systems successively. Modern civilization has not yet discarded this antiquated ownership concept, which was originally derived from ancient Rome. In fact, this is one of the main roots of the present global crisis in which the rich becomes richer and the poor becomes poorer.
When Christianity became the state religion of the Roman empire, the early Christian teachings on land were overtaken by the Roman land laws of "dominium" - a legalization of property in land originally obtained by conquest and plunder. A largely corrupted Christianity, uprooted from its early teachings on land ownership, too often went hand in hand with the exploitation and degradation of centuries of colonial conquests.
The Bible expresses the fundamental recognition that the Earth is the Lord’s, to be fairly shared and stewarded by all:
The land must not be sold beyond reclaim, for the land is Mine; you are but strangers resident with me. (Lev. 25:23)When it comes to property ownership it is the value of the improvement only, and not the Earth itself, that is individual property...Every proprietor owes to the community a ground rent for the land which he holds. Landlords grow richer in their sleep without working, risking, or economizing. The increase in the value of land, arising as it does from the efforts of an entire community, should belong to the community and not to the individual who might hold title. Do what we may, we can accomplish nothing real and lasting until we secure to all the first of those equal and inalienable rights with which.... man is endowed by his creator - the equal and inalienable right to the use and benefit of natural opportunities, all Earth natural resources.
The profit of the Earth is for all. (Eccles. 5:9)
Woe unto them that join house to house, that lay field to field, till there be no place. (Isaiah 5:8)
Restore, I pray you, to them even this day, their lands, their vineyards, their olive yards, and their houses. (Nehemiah 5:11).
All creation is the Lord's and we are responsible for the ways in which we use and abuse it. We believe that Christian faith denies to any person or group of persons exclusive and arbitrary control of any other part of the created universe.
The land is a gift of the Creator to all men and therefore its richness cannot be distributed among a limited number of people while others are excluded from its benefits. - Pope John Paul II, Bahia Blanca, Brazil, 1986
God intended the Earth and all things in it for the use of all peoples, in such a way that the goods of creation should abound equitably in the hands of all, according to the dictate of justice, which is inseparable from charity. - Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World, Vatican II
The right of land ownership and of free bargaining in land are subordinated to the fundamental right of man to obtain the necessities of life. In the force of the fundamental claim of the Commonwealth there is no unconditional right of land ownership. - Pope Paul VI, Populorum Progressio, 1967
Every man, as a living being gifted with reason, has in fact from nature the fundamental right to make use of the material goods of the Earth. - Pope Pius XII
The planet and all its resources of land, water, forests, minerals, the atmosphere, electro-magnetic frequencies, and even satellite orbits are the common heritage of all and must no longer be appropriated for the private profit of a few to the exclusion of the many. The Global Economic Model makes sure that the profits of the Earth will benefit the people and the planet and secure an age of peace and plenty for all.
The incentive signals of the world's taxation systems currently promote waste, war, environmental damage, and the concentration of wealth. Approximating the composition of the world's $8 trillion tax pie reveals that 90% of taxes fall on work while only 5% is collected from environmentally damaging activities. A mere 3% of global tax revenues is captured from natural resource use and access fees. A modest global tax shift scenario would collect 20% from environmental damage, 15% from land use and resource royalties and cut environmentally harmful subsidies by 90%. This would free up an additional 10% of current revenues and permit a nearly one-third reduction on wages and capital to 50% of total global taxes.
While a clear title to land gives the security of use rights, under
current private property regimes it also permits owners to speculate and
profit from land as a market commodity. Thus we have also noted cases where
landless people who have been given secure title sometimes quickly sell
their land for immediate cash benefits. When they are unable to obtain
employment to pay rent for housing, the cycle of poverty and landlessness
begins anew.
Holding land as investment property and a way to accumulate wealth
is actually maladaptive to a market economy. This tenure approach has been
identified as a primary cause of the maldistribution of wealth problem
which is rampant in capitalist systems. Land can not respond to supply
and demand dynamics. There can be increasing demand for land but there
is never a corresponding increase of supply as the supply of land was determined
aeons ago by whatever unfathomable forces of the universe created it.
The commodification of land and land speculation inflates land values to the point where those who have only labor to contribute to the productive process must pay ever higher amounts for access to land for shelter. Taxation placed upon wage labor further decreases purchasing capacity.
Those with the most valuable land, and there is always the situation that some land is more valuable than others, have an advantage over those with less valuable land. Having a more advantageous position, the holders of the better lands see their wealth increase above and beyond the wealth of those with the poorer land and those who have no land at all. They then frequently use their greater wealth and power to acquire additional land.
Soon land values rise more rapidly than wages. Workers must borrow to pay for land. They borrow from those who already have acquired surplus wealth and have deposited their funds in banks. Now the landless must pay interest in order to buy land. The people with surplus wealth become even richer. If the workers lose their jobs and cannot pay the mortgage, they must surrender their land to the banks.
The commodified land tenure and land-backed mortgage banking system is the problem, not the solution. We see this problem throughout the world now, for instance in the unbridled power of big financial interests to force people off of lands for so-called development projects, such as big dams which displace millions of people and supply water and electricity primarily to a few wealthy landholders and businesses rather than to all on an equitable basis.
Most of the people who are landless squatters around the urban centers in the developing world have been pushed off of their lands in rural areas, displaced from self-sufficient lives where they had direct access to land and resources to provide for their basic needs. This is the extensive dimension of the land problem - the fact that so few now control so much of the land and resources of the world.
As the taxation of land values, essentially a 'user fee' system, becomes an integral component of Earth management, several things would have to happen at the same time:
1. land tenure will be based on fairness, not force, thus ameliorating
territorial conflict, a root cause of war;
2. land resources can be equitably allocated;
3. the economic playing field is level;
4. a genuinely free market is encouraged;
5. the gap between the rich and poor narrows; and
6. the necessary collective activities of humanity are properly funded,
which include peacekeeping, and the restoration and protection of the environment.
The Global Economic Model has put forward a system of finance based on principles of subsidiarity in terms of implementation. The ground rent of certain specific types of land and other natural resources can be collected by clearly delineated governing bodies from the local to the global level. Thus, cities and counties would draw their funding from the ground rent of surface lands; regional authorities would collect the ground rent of oil and minerals, and of other Earth natural resources, global governing agencies would be funded by a percentage from these two levels as well as that of deep sea resources, the electromagnetic spectrum, satellite orbital zones, and other global natural resources.
Sufficiently high user fees and pollution permits encourage business and industry to find more efficient and cost-effective controls. Pollution taxes function as pay-for-use fees for common heritage resources of land, water and air and make the tax system work for the people and the planet. Taxes also aim to eliminate numerous subsidies deemed no longer necessary, environmentally or socially harmful, or inequitable.
Decreasing the tax on buildings gives property owners the incentive to build and to maintain and improve their properties. As the levy on land values is increased, land speculation and poor land utilization, an example being slum buildings and boarded up buildings, are discouraged. The signal thus sent to property holders is to either improve their properties or sell them to someone who can do so. Either way, labor and capital gain access to land to improve and augment the building stock. The tax incentives are harnessed correctly to encourage effort directed to the provisioning of housing and other basic human needs.
Shifting the tax burden in this way discourages land hoarding and encourages good land utilization. It promotes a more efficient use of urban infrastructure (such as roads and sewers), decreases the pressure towards urban sprawl (as there is significant infill development), and assures a broader spread of the benefits of development to the community as a whole.
Property tax relief for agricultural land may increase the likelihood that it will attract those looking primarily for tax shelters and speculative investments. Such nonproductive incentives ultimately inflate land values overall, making it increasingly difficult for working farmers to access and maintain acreage for viable agricultural enterprise.
The high price of land means that the modern food and agriculture system provides no options for those who cannot find a paying job other than subsistence on charity or government supports. Those with minimum wage incomes are finding it increasingly difficult to afford decent housing. These social problems and pressures are bound to increase with the cut-off of welfare and other government subsidies to the poor.
Intensively managed small farms and well-designed ecological villages could produce a diverse range of food, fiber, livestock, and energy products for local markets. Bio-intensive farming methods depending on renewable energy sources can yield both social and environmental stability. The establishment of labor and bio-intensive small farming operations can be greatly furthered by land value tax policies which remove taxes on labor and productive capital while promoting affordable land access.
This Global Movement for land value taxation and natural resource rent for revenue can provide the basis for worldwide economic democracy. Freedom to live or work in any part of the globe would also further equality of entitlement to the planet, and provide a basis for the resolution of resource wars and territorial conflicts. There would be no more private profit as unearned income from Earth natural resources. Instead, transparent and accountable resource agencies would collect resource rents and distribute those funds in public services or as direct citizen dividends. With fundamental democracy in rights to the Earth firmly established through legal means and mandates, basic needs would be secured for all and the militarized national security state and its bloated budgets could wither away.
Land value taxation policies shift taxes off of labor and productive capital and onto land and resources, thus collecting ground rent for the benefit of all rather than the profit of a few. Freeing labor from taxation assures maximum purchasing capacity. Collecting ground rent through land value recapture and land value taxation provides an equitable and sufficient source of public funds to finance infrastructure for water and sewage systems, transportation, education and other community services. Land also maintains affordability when it is freed from speculation and private profiteering.
A shift to land value taxation will likely have the following benefits in the rural area:
Discourage speculation in land
Reduce the price of land to equate with its value for production
Enable new entrants to more easily obtain land
Limit farm sizes to those of the most productive units
Enable the reduction of taxation on earnings and capital
Reduce interest rates as land became more affordable
Prevent rural depopulation
Encourage owner-occupation rather than absentee ownership
Promote more responsible use of land
Promote a rural renaissance.
While we are preparing to implement city and country wide land value taxation, we can model this approach through the Global Community Land Trust leases which secure title and tenure to the poor and landless while eliminating the problem of the commodification of land.
The money collected from land rents can be allocated for:
(1) capitalization and maintenance of needed community infrastructure
- water, sewage, transport, public safety, and education, and/or for
(2) interest free revolving loan funds made available for housing construction
and the development of small or cooperative business activities.
This approach provides needed services without taxing labor or productive capital and takes private profiteering out of banking and loan arrangements. Freed from taxation, production can proceed efficiently. Freed from usury the money system can now begin to function like a public trust.
For instance, the full resource rents from surface land would eliminate the need for land mortgages as land could be secured on the basis of a simple annual fee according to land value. No other charges would fall on the backs of labor and thus wages and purchasing capacity would increase. Secure private home ownership would be the rule. Labor with access to affordable land would produce quality affordable housing for all.
Nearly half of corporate profits comes from real estate related activities. A tax on land would thus fall heavily on corporate held lands which cannot escape from taxation via offshore accounts and other tax shelters. Labor would gain affordable access to land resources and capital. The products of labor on land would increasingly be owned and controlled by voluntary cooperative organizations. The removal of federal subsidies for agribusiness combined with affordable land access will give a great impetus to organic, sustainable agriculture.
A condition of the permission to extract natural resources or to use water or air would be the advanced payment of environmental security deposits. While heavy pollution taxes would drastically increase incentives for clean technologies, the environmental security deposits would only be returned if the land resource was left in an acceptably healthy condition.
All the Earth natural resources belong to the Global Community to be used, developed and conserved for the maximum benefit of the people and of all life. However, the challenges of global warming and non-renewable resource depletion dictates that oil and other non-renewable resource rents should be invested in socially and environmentally responsible ways and primarily in the needed transition to renewable energy technologies. The tax put on non-renewable resources in the world should be citizen empowered.
Water belongs to the Earth and all species and is sacred to life therefore, the world’s water must be conserved, reclaimed and protected for all future generations and its natural patterns respected.
Water is a fundamental human right and a public trust to be guarded by all levels of government; therefore, it should not be commodified, privatized or traded for commercial purposes. These rights must be enshrined at all levels of government. In particular, an international treaty must ensure these principles are noncontrovertable.
Water is best protected by local communities and citizens, who must
be respected as equal partners with governments in the protection and regulation
of water. Peoples of the Earth are the only vehicle to promote democracy
and save water.
* That the Statement of rights, responsibilities, and accountabilities of the Global Community citizens be used as a fundamental concept, ideology, social way of life by all Peoples of the world;
* That the Global Citizens Rights, Responsibility and Accountability Act be made a part of government in all nations.
1. That Global Parliament approves the Global Constitution.
2. That Global Parliament proposes a short version of the Global Constitution be developed throughout year 2006.
3. That Global Dialogue 2006 be organized to ask Peoples from all over the world to write the short version from the actual longer version.
4. That this new project be promoted in many ways including being a school project for all students.
This project will help humanity understand itself better.
Certainly our work is sound. We have already produced very valuable
and original tools to help humanity: the Vision of Earth in Year 2024,
the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Global Community,
the Earth Court of Justice, global ministries, and we stood for the values
we promoted no matter how big was the opponent. Now is time to expand our
work for the good of all humanity.
Send your scenario. We will have workshop sessions on the scenarios
in Global dialogue 2006.
All families need shelter, food, language, body of
knowledge, certain skills, a source of income. Security of the home is an important aspect for any family and the global community
it belongs to. Primordial human needs raise the question of interacting universal responsibilities. In terms of parenthood,
parents must raised their children mentally and physically healthy. It
is a responsibility to do so. Which also means each local community must have an educational
system to help parents rasie the child. The vast disparities
in reproductive health worldwide and the greater vulnerability
of the poor to reproductive risk point to several steps all governments
can take, with the support of other sectors, to improve the health
of women and their families: More and more young people on every continent want to start bearing children later in life and to have smaller families than at any
time in history. Likewise, in greater proportions than ever, women and girls in particular want to go to school and to college, and
they want to find fulfilling and well-paid employment. Helping people in every country obtain the information and services they
need to put these ambitions into effect is all that can be done, and all that needs to be done, to bring world population growth
to a stable landing in the new century. 1. Making sustainable development a universal value in the way
we conduct our lives.
2. Realizing and accepting that health is a complex state involving
mental, emotional, physical, spiritual and social well-being.
3. The important part
of the thinking in both community health and ecological sustainability
is the need to find a sense of community as a crucial aspect of healthy
individual development.
4. Apply a wellness approach in dealing with
physical well-being. There is a multitude of influences shaping family life and its
well-being. Wellness is a concept related to physical well-being. It is a new
health paradigm replacing the old model of doctors, drugs, and treating
symptoms. Spiritual well-being deals with mental, emotional and spiritual as
well as physical health. Instead of blaming the doctor for an illness and
expecting insurance companies and government to pick up the health care tab, a
wellness approach places personal responsibility as part of the solution.
5. All cultures and nations value the family as an important social unit. The family is the basic social unit of The
Global Community (or Earth Community or Earth Society). 6. Members of The Global Community
organization appreciate all people's cultural and religious perspectives
on family planning. We are promoting tolerance for their beliefs and
practices.
7. We want to cooperate on a global scale in making the world a
better place for our children and their families.
8. Our species is threatened of extinction unless we all
behave and conduct our lives responsibly. The Global Community
organization has taken the role of a unique and universal society that
represents the best possible values for the survival of our species and
of all life on Earth. We are the new Earth Community or Earth Society.
9. Before making a decision on issues we will
reflect on the universal ethical principles.
We have before us many principles that tell something
about issues:
The principle of justice: all persons within
a given society deserve equal access to goods and services that
fulfill basic human needs. The principle of individual liberty:
individuals have the freedom of decision and action, to the extent
that their actions do not interfere with the rights of others. The utilitarian principle: morally right
actions or policies are those that result in the greatest number of
people. These principles help us in understanding the extent of
the issue. 10. The Global Community organization promotes women’s rights
11. We accept human rights as part of our universal values from which we base our decisions.
12. We promote gender equality.
13. We help adults become interested in the concept of sustainability
by transforming their patterns of living and
working; adults go through a learning process and we will first enable them to return to their sense of life purpose, re-defining and raising
their quality of life, and mobilizing their moral and ethical autonomy, particularly in the context of work. During
this process, adults will begin a transformative journey from "the mode of
having" including consuming and grasping, to "the mode of being" or relatedness, a mode that is part of an ecological way of being.
Both transformative and restorative learning are vital
elements for integrating ecological principles into everyday living and working and hence, for creating sustainable societies. 14. We promote political well-being, or an internal sense of power and autonomy,
as being in control
of one's life, being able to and having the freedom to make decisions, being aware of and able to anticipate the consequences of one's
actions on one's self and others and having the skills to act on one's
decisions, being individuals who no longer accept unquestioningly those practices in
society that are frequently taken for granted, those practices which reinforce inequality and injustice.
15. We promote and live our lives as a
personal sustainable development that has to do with each and everyone of us:
* being with self-control; eating
to accommodate our body's needs and holding hereditary ills in check;
maintaining a well working physical vehicle (our body); balancing our life
with work, play and rest; feeding our mind and being constantly learning; communicating with others
Everyone has to decide this by himself. Knowing our weaknesses we can
work at eliminating them or at least making sure they would not affect
significantly our decision-making process. It is a struggle that spans
our lifetime. Once an individual is in control of his (or
her) own being then he can extend
his empowerment out to his 'global community' (the one around ourselves
like an imaginary glass bubble surrounding us) and The Global Community.
16. Building the capacity of the poor to develop their own strategies for overcoming poverty and supporting these very strategies enables us
to ensure sustainability of poor people’s own initiatives. Moving towards institutional sustainability is important for ensuring that
financial services are available on a long-term basis for the poor. This should not, however, compromise the need to ensure the
sustainability and development of the poor people’s activities themselves. The
human element is a key determinant for growth and sustainability.
17. We have come to realize that achieving sustainable development
is linked with
policies emphasizing community, the value of information, originality in ideas, and the arts.
18. The Global Community (or
Earth Community) is becoming pluralistic. Recognition and
respect of this pluralism is a necessity for the survival of mankind.
The history of humanity has always been that of an increasingly more complex interrelationship between its members.
Clans to tribes, to nations, to empires, and to today's economic and political alliances. Societies have become global and communications
have made us all 'neighbours'. Massive migrations within and among countries have contributed to increasing contacts between human beings
of different origins, religions, ideologies, and moral-value systems.
19. The Global Community (or
Earth Community) recognizes that all human beings are
born free and equal in dignity and rights. Freedom is both a principle
and a value. It is because human beings are free that they are subject
of law and are creators and holders of rights. Freedom and human rights
are therefore basic to each other. Fundamental freedoms are far from being enjoyed by all but it is our
common future, it is part of our Vision statement for year 2024. Human
freedom is a value to be attained. Equality is a value, an ideal for people who live
a hard day-to-day life of economic inequalities such as unemployment,
and social inequalities caused by the privileges enjoyed by some people
and the exploitation of others, and inequality of educational and health
opportunities. Freedom and equality are both indispensable. Equality and freedom are therefore accepted and
enshrined as universal values by which The Global Community
organization will governed its affairs. As universal values they are
concerned with our ability to decide, to choose values and to
participate in the making of laws, and they are dependent on the recognition
of other people. These values forbid any form of discrimination on the
grounds of race, nationality, sex, religion, age or mother tongue. By accepting both values of freedom and equality we can
achieve justice. One can be answerable for one's actions in a 'just' way
only if judgements are given in the framework of democratically
established laws and courts. Social justice is another universal value to which The
Global Community aspires and accepts as a universal value.
Social justice consists in sharing wealth with a view to greater
equality and the equal recognition of each individual's merits. Human rights and democracy are closely
intertwined. Respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms is one of the characteristics of a democracy. The typical
fundamental freedoms of a democracy (freedom of expression, thought, assembly,
and association) are themselves part of human rights. These freedoms were
present during the World Congress as we have dialogue and debate
on the rights of different people and their accompanying obligations and
responsibilities as human beings. These freedoms can exist everywhere.
Democracy is a political system based on the participation of
the people. It foresees the separation of powers among the judiciary, the
legislative and the executive authorities, as well as free and regular
elections. The organization promotes efficient forms of management and
participation. The political rights of The Global Community
define the conditions under which citizens exercise their responsibilities.
For our organization to be democratic, we must organized our political
and social life with the greatest respect of all peoples. 20. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights resides
in the fact that it gives equal emphasis to cultural rights, economic
and social rights, and civil and political rights. The
Global Community organization asks how meaningful is the right
to life or to participation in political life, if poverty, gender
inequality, destitution
and epidemics prevent individuals from enjoying freedom of movement,
freedom to vote, to marry and so on? We found evident that
economic and social rights are the essential prerequisite for the
effectiveness and exercise of all rights recognized for human beings.
This was the reason for organizing the World Congress: to
find the best ways to sustain us all. The developing countries are
having a harder time than others to achieve the exercise of these rights
on a lasting basis, with the problems of economic globalization
presenting new challenges. We must therefore beware of enforcing
economic rights alone to the detriment of individual civil rights and
the rights of all individuals to decide their own fate and the future of
their country, their political rights.
The universality of human rights recognizes the right of
all individuals to participate in the cultural life of their community
and of other country, to receive education and training, and to be
informed. In this World Congress, you were asked to
list universal values that were the most important, very important, important, not
so important, and values that should be let go in order to sustain all
life on Earth. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights is certainly a good start in findings universal values.
We are aware that traditional customs and standards could
burden the sustainability of all life on Earth. They could burden Earth
society or any society forever, and holds individuals in a straitjacket.
We cannot accept that. No one can! There are choices to be made and you
must make them. Cultures can develop and can go on developing. Even
religious beliefs may evolve. We are living now and we are able to
create these changes. We are at least as bright , most certainly
brighter, than the people who were living thousand of years ago. As far as The Global
Community is concerned, cultural and religious differences
cannot be a reason or an excuse or a pretext for not respecting human
rights. Quite the contrary, all kinds of cultures may promote human
rights and especially cultural rights. They are different in their
achievements, but they are equal in dignity where they are expressions
of freedom. At any time or in any given place, men, women and children
use their culture to invent new ways of making human rights a living
reality. Diversity enriches us if it respects the dignity of each
individual, and if it takes account of human rights as a whole.
Human rights represent an ideal and a supreme goal which
can give meaning to life in society. Throughout the history of humanity,
the rights of human beings have been defined and enshrined with
reference to the values of the dignity of each individual and of
freedom, equality and justice. These values are universal. The
Global Community has accepted and enshrined them into its own
ways of behaving and dealing with all peoples. Cultures and societies
differ so much that their expression takes varying forms, but diversity
does not affect the foundation of inalienable values constituted by
human rights. Each individual is recognized as a representative of
humankind. Human dignity resides in each of us and this dignity must be
recognized and respected by all. 21. We accept the Earth Charter as drafted
by the Earth Charter Commission. When the organization becomes better structured
members will be asked to vote for its inclusion as our Earth Charter. For now
there is more work to do. The Earth Charter was part of the Discussion
Roundtables of the World Congress and as such new amendments were proposed. For
instances, the universal values (and others to come) promoted by The Global
Community are to be included in the Charter along with the
proposal of new human rights: fresh water and clean air are human rights. We
respectfully ask Ms. Mirian Vilela, Earth Charter Project Manager for The Earth
Council, to review and amend the draft. All
information you need to do so is on our websites. We want to see the spirit of
our organization included (in writing) in the draft. For instance The Global
Community means the Earth Community. Members may wish to change
the name but all basic global community principles, concepts, and values will
still be kept and must be included in the Charter. This World Congress
has showed us that there is a close interdependence between the human health, the conduct of the people, the quality of their environment,
the type of their professional occupation, the motives and objectives of their lives, the relationships with other people and with the
natural elements. The Earth Charter must be drafted to spell out this
spirit of collectiveness and global community, and it must be specifically made
for our organization, The Global
Community (or the Earth Community) organization, and none
others.
22. We consider that Indigenous peoples and their nurturing of spiritual and environmental partnership with nature - a valuable and integral part of their
socio-economic structure. The change of focus platform preserves the socio-economic relationship with nature that is evident in many
Indigenous societies, and calls for the integration of contemporary environmental sciences to assist in environmental goals. Therefore,
the change of focus platform encourages the conscious participation of all peoples towards a more environmentally sympathetic global
order. By associating Indigenous values with contemporary sciences, it is also possible to produce a strategy to effect environmental
consciousness in capitalist production. For instance, in Canada, we are
concerned that among First Nations people is the under-representation of
Aboriginal students in all science disciplines such as health-related professions. For those students who are interested in working with
Aboriginal populations, there is a requirement for an understanding of basic science as well as traditional healing philosophies and
approaches. Furthermore, as society continues to rely more and more heavily on technology, it is increasingly important that there
should be a large proportion of Aboriginal people with a balanced scientific background.
We is, therefore, a great need to
initiate, develop, and promote programs in science among First Nations students in order to attract them into scientific professions.
23. In health, an adequate level of health care is a universal value as well as a human right. We expect adequate health
services to be accessible, affordable, compassionate and socially acceptable. The Global Community organization is proposing
that every individual of a society is co-responsible for helping in implementing
and managing health programmes along with the government and the public
institutions.
24. Quality of life is a multi-dimensional, complex and very
subjective concept. For instance, someone who has changed their
consumption habits to better ensure that their choices will make a better quality of life for themselves, the environment and future
generations, may be seen by others as having a lower or inferior quality of life since they have removed themselves from the
materialistic mainstream characteristic of our consumer society. Someone may feel that an absence of violence and abuse in their life
leads to a higher quality of living even though they have fewer tangible resources, money, or shelter; peace of mind and freedom from
abuse has increased the quality of their daily life relative to what it was like before.
There are universal quality of life values which lead to "human betterment" or the improvement of the
human condition. In addition to the value of species survival (human and other living organisms), they include: adequate resources,
justice and equality, freedom, and peace or balance of power. A better quality
of life for all people of The Global
Community is a goal for all of us and one of our universal
values.
25. We now have a way of dealing with
globalization: global ethics. In the past, corporation’s rule without checks and balances.
For now on there will be checks and balances. Our judgement will be based on
global ethics. Global ethics must always be grounded in
realities.
But realities are changing constantly and are different in different
places. We live in a world that makes progress toward democracy. Ethics
and morality exist only when human beings can act freely. In our free
society, rights are tied to responsibilities. Corporations are committed to improvement in business performance
and want to be seen as 'good corporate citizens' on a local and a global
scale. Corporations have social responsibilities as they are an
integral part of society. Global ethics recalls that those realities, on which others build upon, have to be protected first.
A classical example is, that to the stewardship of the ecological base (the base of life) has to be given priority before the fulfilment of various economic and social wishes.
Demands resulting from the social system of a particular country have to find their limits in the protection of the global ecosystem or the aim of
maximization of labour productivity in agriculture and forestry should not be realised at the expense of biodiversity landscapes.
Vital interests of future generations have to be considered as having priority before less vital interests of the present generation. Typical examples are climate change,
fresh water, clean air and soil erosion.
Supply chains have to be designed in a way, that the goods can enter after usage or consumption into natural
or industrial recycling processes. If serious damages to persons, animals, plants and the ecosystem cannot be excluded, an action or pattern of behaviour should be refrained from.
A striking example is the use of negotiations and community principles to
resolve conflicts in other countries. Never use armed intervention to resolve a
conflict. Never go to war. A measure for supplying goods or services should choose a
path which entails the least possible impact on the ecological and social system concerned.
This way functioning proven systems will not be disturbed, and unnecessary risks
will not be taken. The Polluter Pays Principle applies to all with no exception.
Supply strategies consuming less resources should have preference before those enhancing more resource consumption.
Strategies, which violate human dignity, should not be permitted. Examples are the expulsion of an indigenous population by the flooding of a valley for a hydroelectric
power plant.
With this World Congress, The
Global Community organization has now at hand the method and framework
to conduct societal checks and balances of sustainable development. A
more balance world economy will result of annual checks and balances.
Corporations will take their social responsibilities and become involved in
designing, monitoring, and implementing these checks and balances. Several
corporations have already done so. Results will
be taken into account in the evaluation of sustainable development. Corporations
are required to expand their responsibilities to include human rights, the
environment, community and family aspects, safe working conditions, fair wages
and sustainable consumption aspects. The
Global Community organization has extended the idea of sustainability to be a moral and ethical state,
as well as an economic and environmental state, wherein sustainable consumption patterns respect the universal values of peace,
security, justice and equity within the human relationships that exist in the global community.
When there is a need to find a solution to a problem or a concern, a sound
solution would be to choose a measure, if possible, which causes reversible
damage as oppose to a measure causing an irreversible loss. 26. Global consumption is a very important
aspect globalization. Consumers should be concerned with the impact of their decisions on the environment but also on the lives and well-being of other people. Since one of
the key functions of families as a social institution is to engage in production (selling their labour in return for wages) and consumption
(using those wages to buy goods and services), then the role of families has impacts
on sustainable consumption and development.
27. Employing participatory approaches in identifying needs, solutions and designing
specific mechanisms for poverty alleviation reduces the risk of programme failure.
Building the capacity of the poor to develop their own strategies for overcoming poverty and supporting these strategies enables us
to ensure sustainability of poor people’s own initiatives. Poverty exists everywhere, and
it
takes dramatic forms in developing countries where governments have a hard time
in coping with the basic needs and demands of their populations. The
distribution of wealth around the world demands more compassionate approaches to
bridging the continuously widening gap between the rich and the poor.
Understanding the economic and social development of a balance world is a
priority of The Global Community organization. The eradication of
poverty in the world is a priority and our responsibility. The interaction of poor health, poverty and environmental
deterioration has been measured and was found to have a direct
relationship with the stage of economic and social development of a
country. Policies to combat poverty should not damage the environment.
Environmental policies should not create poverty. This requires:
The diversification of production activities thereby
reducing pressure on natural resources A major change in consumer habits so as to be compatible
with the natural environment The development of technologies aimed at specific
environmental and social conditions; 'clean' technologies that have less
impact on the environment Several developing countries are ruled by socio-economic and
political structures that are oppressive, and it is the inherently
vulnerable and dependent groups that are at a higher risk of neglect and
abuse. There has to be an organized NGO sector and active human-rights groups in
such societies in order to protect and defend the oppressed people. 28. No more conflicts and wars. Wars begin in our minds, and it is therefore
in our minds that the event of peace must be constructed. We may desire peace
and abhor war and also be moved by the suffering it causes but this is not
enough. We must realize that knowledge of and respect for human rights and other
universal values found in this World Congress can lead each member of The
Global Community towards the universal peace to which we all aspire.
29. The Global Community is on a massive spiritual quest. The human
species is now going through a major evolutionary stage in its development.
There will be a shift in consciousness that will bring us all together and
closer to God. This change will occur within a generation. The Global
Community organization has a duty to guide people through this process.
This is what the World Congress is about.
Spiritual well-being is in relation to society's loss of spirituality,
spirituality in the family, and spirituality shaping home economics practice,
and the new focus to be attained by The Global Community.
Spirituality does not refer to any specific religion or faith. Spirituality
is not about religion. Spirituality is about reaching one's full potential,
about developing and nurturing supporting and sustaining relationships, and
about seeking and finding meaning in our lives and seeking one's own truth,
values and perspective on life. It is about laughter, joy, happiness, belonging,
acceptance and community spirit. Spirituality is also about finding a new
relationship with humanity based on trust, peace, and universal values we found
in this World Congress.
Spirituality is also a sense of being connected with a positive force
or Being greater than oneself. In the world of spirituality and
religious beliefs it is better to have God closer to us, no tier person in
between. We are with
God anytime and anyplace with think of God. We are also connected with The
Soul of Humanity. Our species can only survive by having each one of us
living responsibly locally and globally so it is better to appreciate a Being
closer to us, The Soul of Humanity. There is true love of us, of
all life on Earth and of Earth itself coming from this Being. It is my
experience that this Being exists and is wonderful. The Soul of Humanity
is with us and God the Spirit. All Souls on Earth are parts of The Soul of
Humanity. We now know that the Souls of all those people who seek
to destroy life on Earth by conflicts and wars will never be allowed back on
Earth to taste life again in whatever form it may be. Nothing or anyone can stop this process. There are trillions of young Souls ready to
replace the entire Earth population if it maybe. No excuse! Not even
humanitarian efforts based on responding to conflicts and wars by conflicts and
wars such as those of the United Nations intervening in other countries
affairs. 30. We need new to create thoughts to sustain
Earth not bombs. This World Congress is breaking grounds in its limitless well of new thoughts. We have created (and still thousands more to come)
new thoughts, concepts, ideas, ways of doing things to sustain Earth throughout the coming millenniums. During the past thousand
years humanity has lived with the "life program information" transferred into the brain via two ways:
our genes, and education and upbringing (IMPRINTING theory). The mechanism of biological information protection did the rest. We
are lock, stock, and barrel with the old stock. In a way! Today our species is evolving to rid itself of the old thoughts that is threatening
its future and survival. This is a survival reaction and is very real. Our species will accomplish the evolutionary leap within a
generation. Our consciousness will evolve rapidly. We will reach levels never imagined before. We will get much closer to God and
God to us as we are parts of his/her own consciousness. The Soul of Humanity
will be guiding us through this process.
31. For a community to be sustainable there has to be a general social
and economical well-being throughout the community. Health is the basic
building block of this well-being. Health is created and lived by people
within a community: where they work, learn, play, and love. Health is a
complex state involving mental, emotional, physical, spiritual, social
and economical well-being. Each community can develop its own ideas of
what a healthy community is by looking at its own situation, and finding
its own solutions. Health promotion generates living and working conditions
that are safe, stimulating, satisfying and enjoyable. To reach a state
of complete physical, mental and social well-being, a community must be
able to identify and to realize aspirations, to satisfy needs, and to change
with the environment. The overall guiding principle for the community is
the need to encourage reciprocal maintenance, to take care of each other
and the environment. The important part of the thinking in both community
health and ecological sustainability is the need to find a sense of community
as a crucial aspect of healthy individual development.
32. The concept of Sustainable Development was presented for the first time in 1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development, in the report Our Common Future . The commission was created by the United Nations, and was made of 21 nations, including Canada. The commission, headed by Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland, said that the planet needs " a new era of environmentally sustainable sound economic development. Dr. Brundtland also said that government must strongly support "a new political approach to environment and development, where economic and fiscal policies, trade and foreign policies, energy, agriculture, industry, and other sectorial policies, all aim to induce development that is not only economically but ecologically sustainable."
The measurement of GSDP gives a proper and sound signal to the public, government and industry about the rate and direction of economic growth; it
identifies environmental, health, and social quality; it identifies sustainable and unsustainable levels of resource and environmental uses; it measures the success or
failure of sustainable development policies and practices; and it identifies resource scarcity. Values obtained enable us to make meaningful comparisons of
sustainable development between cities, provinces, nations over the entire planet. The world population is becoming more urban.
It is the quality of the urban environment and its well-being that
constitutes a challenge to any society. Cities are the centres of
economic and cultural life of a nation's population. The public wants
government expenditures to be directed to areas such as urban
development, health, housing, education, crime prevention, recreation,
environmental pollution control, waste management, aesthetic
satisfaction, well-being and many others. It is important to have social indicators that can tell
us about the quality and costs of essential elements such as:
educational and cultural facilities, suitable community facilities and
services, proper shelter, family life, security from crime, efficient
and environmentally conscious transportation, social justice, aesthetic
satisfaction, and minority status.
Is the actual rate of development too slow or too fast?
Are People aspects being stressed too far?
Are resources and the environment managed in a sustainable manner?
What forms of community and home designs promote sustainability?
In what ways should social, educational, and health programs and services be modified?
Is this generation leaving to the future generation a world that is at least as diverse and productive as the one it inherited?
What improvements can be brought up to the quality of development? 33. We are proposing to make fresh water a
human right. The existing and future uses of water are
constantly challenged; balancing supply and demand is made even harder by the
amounts of pollution found in the air, land and waters. Pollution is widespread
and people are dying because of it. As soon as more pollution is added into the
fresh water systems than people and all life die. This is true even with the
best system in the world. We live on the edge. Rainwater could carry pollution
to the fresh water supply, and it is too late.
34. We are proposing to make air a human
right. Industrial pollution plays a major role in the deterioration of nature
but this time the level of pollution is above the carrying capacity of the
ecosystem.
35. Soil and water conservation activities are under taken under various agro-ecological and socio-economic circumstances, in different parts of the
World. However, for a multitude of reasons farmers do not generally engage on their own in investment in soil and water conservation. In the more advanced economies farmers may sometimes take initiative, but in most cases they are stimulated to do so as a result of specific government policies, direct
incentives on participation in specific projects. Despite all help the world is
loosing its best soils and water is getting more polluted. We are proposing that
The Global Community organization becomes a major driving force
for the protection of soils and fresh water in the world. 36. Carbon Tax
The tax system is a device for influencing behaviour so as to
encourage socially and environmentally useful activities and to discourage those
that are not. It can also increase social and economic well-being. The
imposition of a carbon tax can result in a net increase in employment as well as
reductions in greenhouses gas emissions. Although fossil fuel-incentive
industries will decline as a result of such a tax, other sectors of the economy
will grow much faster and generate new jobs. Failures to take these measures to
protect the environment will have greater negative impacts on poorer households
as poorer households suffer more from environmental degradation. We are
proposing here the following scenario: The Better Ecological Tax
scenario The Better Ecological Tax scenario is the
resulting package obtained after comparing it to the business-as-usual
scenario. It includes: Policy measures on a range of environmental, economic and
social equity indicators Policy measures in the areas of atmospheric emissions, water
use, solid and industrial wastes, forests and natural amenities In the atmospheric emission area, these measures will
reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the electricity, industrial and
transportation sectors; they will also reduce urban air pollution and result in
significant job creation. These measures are: A carbon tax levied at a rate of $20 per
tonne of CO2 Mandatory fuel efficiency standards for
vehicles Reduction of sale tax on the most fuel
efficient vehicles Abolition of payroll taxes
In the water use area, measures will reduce urban water
consumption and diminish pollution. These measures are: A 25% increase in urban water prices and a
nation-wide shift to user charges A long-term investment program in water
conservation and recycling projects Rebates on rates for low-income households
adversely affected by price rises Full-scale system of tradeable water
permits
In the solid and industrial waste area, measures will
reduce resource use and wastes from both industry and households. The measures
are: Comprehensive system of load-based
licensing for industrial polluters Full cost-recovery charges for landfill Demonstration program for cleaner
production technologies Investment in renovating tips No sales taxes on recycling materials
In the native forests area, measures will protect high
conservation value native forests. The measures are: Ban on logging in high conservation value
native forests Increase in royalties levied on native
forest logs
In the natural amenities area, measures will protect
valuable natural amenities from inadequate funding for protection and repair.
The measures are: Increase the charges to tourists using
facilities Increase the charges to enter facilities
Evaluation of indicators show that the Better Ecological
Tax scenario shows that in the long-term there will be definite
improvements in all aspects including the economy. 37. Globalization of the world economic system is proceeding at a very rapid pace, and is generally promoted as being welfare-improving. This phenomenon is also present in the arena of international finance. In this area, however, the presumed virtues of
globalization are far from being materialised. Until now, no orderly or stable financial system has been
implemented. Furthermore, the current financial system does not succeed in channelling sufficient funds to finance crucial world problems such as adequate social development in poor countries.
The line of thought proposed here to cure these shortcomings is to use a tax instrument; a straightforward mechanism designed to tax the currently undertaxed (international) financial flows. More specifically, this proposal calls for the implementation of a tax that is levied on international currency transactions, i.e. a
'Currency Transaction Tax' (CTT) by James Tobin; it is an
internationally uniform tax to be payable every time a currency is converted. From the viewpoint of sustainable development, a very strong case in favour of introducing a
Tobin tax on financial transactions can be made for two main reasons: 38. Fresh water or drinking water is vital to
life on Earth. Only 2.5 per cent of all water on Earth is fresh water most of which lies deep and frozen in Antarctica
and Greenland. What we drink comes mostly from groundwater, rivers and
lakes. Precipitation, melt water from glaciers, dew and fog drip constantly
replenish our fresh water resources. They are also constantly depleted by
evaporation and transpiration. These water resources are changing due to the the
variations in the hydrological cycle from place to place and from day to day.
They are all what we have got. Nothing else! They are very precious to all
humankind, and to all life as well.
Human actions constantly modify the hydrological cycle and also
constantly pollute available water. The hydrological balance is changed by:
Irrigation Drainage Land use change Removal of trees Removal of vegetative cover Expansion of paved areas Building of dams Building of channels Building of inter-basin transfers A Water Resources Assessment is
a prerequisite for sustainable development and management of a country's water
resources. It provides the basis for a vast range of activities: Domestic and industrial water supply Hydropower production Irrigation and drainage Maintenance of human health Mitigation of flood losses Navigation Preservation of the aquatic ecosystem Tourism New legislation and regulations Strategies and policies that deal
with priority of uses and resolution of conflicts The existing and future uses of water are
constantly challenged; balancing supply and demand is made even harder by the
amounts of pollution found in the air, land and waters. Pollution is widespread
and people are dying because of it. As soon as more pollution is added into the
fresh water systems than people and all life die. This is true even with the
best system in the world. We live on the edge. Rainwater could carry pollution
to the fresh water supply, and it is too late. Today there are a multitude of pollution sources
and just to name a few: Animal manure Discharge from industrial processes Drainage from mines and industrial wastes Leaching of the residues of fertilisers and
pesticides used in agriculture Acid rain Oil spills from ships Storm water systems from cities carry
pollution Gulf courses upstream or near a lake Untreated sewage Leakage from oil storage tanks Many of the 100,000 or so commercial
chemicals employed in the world today create difficulties as a lot of them
are released into aquatic ecosystems Wet and dry deposition of materials
transported through the atmosphere and which originate from emissions made
in industrial areas and from motor vehicles Water pollution varies in severity from one
region to the next depending of the density of urban development, agricultural
and industrial practices and the presence or absence of systems for collecting
and treating the waste waters. It is necessary to measure the water's quality,
quantity and biological characteristics in every country. A lot of the data in
the global hydrological network dedicated to measuring these elements are
missing. It is non-existent in most developing countries. Data on water use are
also scarce. Global demand for water is rising. The rise will
accelerate into the future because the world population is expected to reach 8.2
billion by the year 2024. Despite the efforts of worldwide organizations to
improve the water services of the developing countries, in 1995 some 20 per cent
of the globe's population of 5.7 billion people still lacked a safe and reliable
water supply, and 50 per cent were without adequate sanitation. Lack of these
services is the basic reason why more than a billion people live in poverty. Even though regulations have been imposed by
governments in the industrialized countries to protect their nations' water
resources, people are still dying. This is due to the fact that regulations are
not enforced as well as they should, regulations are not tough enough, and
people dont care and often challenge them their own ways. We basically live on
the edge. No safety net! Human health is dependent on a wholesome and
reliable supply of water and safe sanitation. It has been estimated that at any
given time about half the people living in developing countries are suffering
from water-related diseases caused directly by infection, or indirectly by
disease-carrying organisms that breed in water. Diarrhoea. infections by
parasitic worms, river blindness and malaria are among the most widespread of
these diseases. More than five million people are estimated to die each year
from diseases related to inadequate sanitation and hygiene practices, and
drinking polluted water. In the developed world there is concern about the
health effects of exposure to various chemicals in drinking water. Pollutants
can build up in shellfish to the point that they harm the people who eat
them. The effects of pollution on wildlife are better
observed: death, population decline, reduced success of hatching, birth defects
for the birds, fish and other forms of life in rivers, lakes, wetlands and
deltas. The Water Scarcity Index is the water use
as a percentage of the available water resource. It can be shown
that the margin between the global available resource and the volume of water
used is going to diminish in the future. Population growth is the major factor.
By the year 2024, the regions of stress will include two thirds of the world's
population. By 2050, they will cover most of the globe. As the crisis approaches
and as water resources become scarcer, the risk of conflict over them will
become greater. After 2024, climate change will make conditions worse if
precipitation amounts decrease in the major food producing regions and
evaporation rates increase. With 50 per cent more people to feed than in 1999,
the volume of water needed for food production is expected to increase by 50 to
100 per cent. The bulk of the increase in food production will come from
irrigation which, in turn, will require more money to be spent on long distance
water transfers and dams. There will be greater competition for these waters.
The cost of water will certainly rise. In order to avoid conflicts and wars over water,
The Global Community organization is proposing to make water at the top of its
agenda. Better understanding and much more data are needed. All nations need to
assess their water resources and make projections for the future. Water
resources must be managed. We propose here to make fresh water a human right.
For centuries we have found it necessary to control water so as to have
it where we wanted it. Despite our efforts, some areas still suffer from drought, and
some from flood, due partly to the nature variability of climate to change fast than it used to, and this is now impacting on the availability and distribution of water. Our fresh water sources are already being used and yet, the world population is increasing rapidly. This increase in population and the increase of pollutants in our drinking water sources have created conflicts which will only become more and more serious in the near future. The policy of privatization and full-cost pricing of water in a city such as in Canada or the U.S.A. sound appropriate as there is plenty of help to the poor who has a need to drink water. Is this policy appropriate in other countries where drinking water sources
are rare, sometimes non-existant, and sometimes were polluted by transnational corporations from our industrialized world and which companies became rich by mining or manufacturing products in those countries. Should anyone be allowed to control our freshwater resources? Is freshwater a 'human right' or is it a 'human need'? Should water resources be privatized and commodified for profit?
Should privatization be under the condition that there is plenty of help to the poor in a community? Or should water be declared a 'human right' in the Earth Charter of The Global Community organization? Is it no true that water
is just as important to an individual as the air we breathe? Water in the home comes from either spring water, a deep well,
a river or a city reservoir, and is never 'pure'. If water was untreated, it would contain man-made contaminants, minerals, gases, salts, and microorganisms, which would cause unacceptable taste or health risks. Hazardous compounds present in water are mercury, lead, agricultural chemicals, arsenic, organochlorine compounds formed by the chlorine added to municipal water to destroy microorganisms, industrial pollutants, solvents,
pesticide, fertilizer, and other contaminants. Our body absorbs equally these contaminants through drinking water or while bathing. City water is regulated for
health hazards and does not contain dangerous bacterial contamination. It may contain chemical contaminants from industrial discharge or hazardous waste disposal, vinyl chloride from P.V.C. plastic pipe.
Most people take for granted the water we use to wash the car,
to water the lawn, cook and flush our wastes away, to shower, do half-loads of laundry, run the water while brushing our teeth, and ignore a dripping tap, and dump down the drain motor oil, solvents, paints, cleaners. We treat oceans, rivers, lakes, and streams more like parts of our sewer system them our life-support system. We are being
made use to this behavior from childhood while watching television. We often see commercials on TV showing a person washing an automobile or spraying a lawn wastefully and without care. There is also too much violence shown on television and in cinemas. We think it is right, our right to be as we are. The entire television networks and film makers and producers over the world should be re-educated in what is right and what is not. They should be responsible and be made accountable for the
counter-educating commercials and products they are advertising
on their networks. What the school system is doing in educating children is being negated by the television networks. It is counter-productive and, at the end, the costs hit the taxpayers at home, one way or the other. The Polluter-pays Principle should apply to television networks and film making industry. They may use Human Rights for their defence but they should pay all the costs of the impacts of their advertisings and mindless production. They create behavioral patterns in the
general population from childhood and they should be billed big time.
As individuals, we can make changes in our ways of using water
and dispose of wastes, both inside our homes and outdoors, and find ways to conserve and protect our water supplies. Water conservation is a means to ensure that there will be enough water for future generations.
Good quality of water supplies to satisfy our lifestyle carries
a price tag defined here:
P(water) = P(storing)
+ P(distributing) + P(treatment)
+
P(maintaining and operating) +
P(e,h)
where P(e,h) is the term representing the associated environmental
and health price tags i.e. the impacts on the environment and our health.
The costs of obtaining, storing, heating, distributing water are
steadily increasing, and so are the environmental and health impacts associated with those costs. The costs for treating wastewater to make it suitable to return to river systems are equally increasing and many communities now charge residents an extra fee for treating wastewater. Consumption rates vary largely from one community to
another, and between urban and rural areas. Some communities have been forced to restrict water consumption for short periods of time.
Human rights are those that individuals have by virtue of their very
existence as human beings:
to live, eat, drink fresh water, breath fresh air, have shelter. Just as human beings have
human rights, they also have moral, legal responsibilities and related
obligations and accountabilities. Every person needs Oxygen to live so clean air is
certainly a primordial human right by our very nature. A large part of our body
is made of water and we could not live without water; therefore water is also a
primordial human rights by our very nature. Fresh water resources and clean air are
therefore proposed to be categorized as human rights.
Globalization in general can be described as a social
process of intensifying the relations between the different parts of the world;
geographical limits become less and less significant. Economic globalization
is seen by the growing interaction and interdependence of
the world's different nations and corporations. The major
aspects of these increased interactions are capital flows, flows
of material goods, and labour. Markets, technologies
and consumption patterns thus gradually let go their
national or local character and become international and
global. Economic globalization leads to globally more
standardized sets of products. Political globalization facilitates the spread of individualism
and thus Western consumer society.
Cultural globalization is concerned with a change of the different
sets of values that are connected to tradition, religion and different political
systems. Cultural globalization is fed by
information passing geographical boundaries
through communication systems and media, like TV,
Internet, advertisement etc. Cultural globalization homogenizes the sets of value systems of different cultures via constantly
evolving
The globalization of consumption
can be observed. Market analyses can prove the existence and the demand of
certain products worldwide and the presence of
corporations in different countries of the world. A globalization of consumption
is actually taking place because we observe that certain products are sold with
success all over the world. Globalization of consumption represents an environmental danger.
The consumer society is blamed for causing the largest part
of environmental problems through resource depletion, emissions and wastes. The concept of "a Global Community" gives back control on our
lives to each one of us. We all have a say about what we want. We feel
alive and responsible. We are moral individuals with a conscience but we
also belong to The Global Community. We have an identity, a meaning,
a part to play in the world.
One tends to be alarmed at the popular concept of globalization because
it is based on greed. Globalization is here to stay and is a fact of life.
The world has become global. Societies throughout the world are struggling
to be in step with the most powerful nations. National economies and financial
markets are connected through computer link-up and are interlocked. Commercial
banking and business ownership has no economic or political borders. Because
of the dynamic of trade in goods and services and because of the movement
in capital and technology, production in different countries has become
increasingly dependent on one another.
In consequence of globalization, the new economic and political distribution
of power around the world has become very different then we were used to.
It has become very fluid, in perpetual motion and affected by global markets.
Giant new markets are forming all over the world. Competition is hardening.
National economies can no longer insure or guarantee rights of possession
on any property. National borders no longer mean protection, security,
cultural boundaries, resources ownership, political and economic control.
International market regulations try to control or ease the effects
of globalization. The effects are often devastating. With globalization
comes global problems such as:
* unemployment in industrial nations
Human conscience will insist all possible measures be taken to prevent
the planet from becoming uninhabitable. Globalization has the effect of
a giant tidal wave on all our values. The Global Community organization
has the task of proposing to the world a new system of values.
Human conscience means humans have the knowledge to keep the planet
healthy; it is the science of determining right and wrong. In case of the
planet's survival it is:
Human conscience can prevent the planet from becoming uninhabitable.
The need to survive can put checks and balances on the rampant
globalization
effects already raging like a virus in our world.
To survive what must be re-thought? Old ideas and values, traditions,
laws, ways of doing things must be re-evaluated and some left behind.
It's your life at stake here. Your life and the lives of your children
~ there is no such thing as you taking a Spectator Sport position in the
grandstands, enjoying the happenings of the time with detachment and amusement!
Men have the right to be able to provide for their families. We can
help the Planet recover from wanton destruction. We can control the resources
of our world with good sense. Greed and power of the few can be replaced
by Community Conscience and the desperate will to survive!!
The choice is simple survival:
* every man has the right to be able to provide for
his family
Actions by groups that lead to revolution and war must be curtailed.
Power based on greed is not in the best interest of humanity.
Globalization is a process interaction which involves growing economic
interdependence of countries worldwide with implications and impacts on social,
cultural, political, environmental and familial aspects and rights. With the
globalization of the economy comes now the task for defining the obligations
that go with the rights. The Global Community organization is concerned with the
sustainability of current levels and patterns of consumption and with the
economic, political, personal, environmental, availability of resources,
societal and spiritual impact of excessive, run-away consumption. The goal of
the World Congress was to find a balanced, sustainable global
consumption. About 20% of Earth’s people account for 80% of the world's total
consumption. We have assigned ourselves the task of finding ways to make consumption,
consumer rights and responsibilities: Fair to the well-being of others Socially responsible and sustainable to future generations In line with the universal values found in this World Congress In line with human rights and responsibilities
Consumers' rights impinge on the rights of other humans living in The
Global Community. The right to choice is the consumer right that refers
to the right to have a range and variety of goods and services at competitive,
fair prices and variable, satisfactory quality. In order to assure choice in the
developed country markets, governments have implemented trade laws to facilitate
cross border transactions and transnational corporations (TNCs) have set up
business off shore so they can lessen the cost of the production process. The
goods that are available in the developed country markets are provided by slave
labour, child labour, sweatshops or in countries that allow the TNCs to forego
adhering to pollution or ecological concerns and human rights in pursuit of
profit. Labour rights are abused in efforts to earn more profits. This leads to
abhorrent working conditions, job insecurity and low living standards (all human
rights). Consumers in developed countries have been socialized to want more and
more things to consume but have not been socialized to appreciate the impact of
their consumption choices on the human rights of other people; that is, they are
not being responsible for their decisions.
One tends to be alarmed at the popular concept of globalization because
it is based on greed. Globalization is here to stay and is a fact of life.
The world has become global. Societies throughout the world are struggling
to be in step with the most powerful nations. National economies and financial
markets are connected through computer link-up and are interlocked. Commercial
banking and business ownership has no economic or political borders. Because
of the dynamic of trade in goods and services and because of the movement
in capital and technology, production in different countries has become
increasingly dependent on one another.
In consequence of globalization, the new economic and political distribution
of power around the world has become very different then we were used to.
It has become very fluid, in perpetual motion and affected by global markets.
Giant new markets are forming all over the world. Competition is hardening.
National economies can no longer insure or guarantee rights of possession
on any property. National borders no longer mean protection, security,
cultural boundaries, resources ownership, political and economic control.
International market regulations try to control or ease the effects
of globalization. The effects are often devastating. With globalization
comes global problems such as:
Human conscience will insist all possible measures be taken to prevent
the planet from becoming uninhabitable. Globalization has the effect of
a giant tidal wave on all our values. The Global Community organization
has the task of proposing to the world a new system of values.
Human conscience means humans have the knowledge to keep the planet
healthy; it is the science of determining right and wrong. In case of the
planet's survival it is:
Human conscience can prevent the planet from becoming uninhabitable.
The need to survive can put checks and balances on the rampant
globalization
effects already raging like a virus in our world.
To survive what must be re-thought? Old ideas and values, traditions,
laws, ways of doing things must be re-evaluated and some left behind.
It's your life at stake here. Your life and the lives of your children
~ there is no such thing as you taking a Spectator Sport position in the
grandstands, enjoying the happenings of the time with detachment and amusement!
Men have the right to be able to provide for their families. We can
help the Planet recover from wanton destruction. We can control the resources
of our world with good sense. Greed and power of the few can be replaced
by Community Conscience and the desperate will to survive!!
The choice is simple survival:
* every man has the right to be able to provide for
his family
Actions by groups that lead to revolution and war must be curtailed.
Power based on greed is not in the best interest of humanity.
A corporation will now be required to:
Be concerned with issues such as climate change, bio-diversity, pollution
prevention and adopt high standards Minimize environmental degradation and health impacts Be responsible for the environmental impact of its products and services
throughout their cycle Adopt a wide environmental code, and policies, health and safety
practices and procedures aimed at reducing resource and energy use in
each stage of a product or service life-cycle Set up appropriate management systems to implement policies Conduct annual checks and balances and provide reports to the community Respect the political jurisdiction of national communities Respect human rights, social and cultural rights Recognize its political and economic impact on local communities Contribute to the long-term social, cultural, environmental and economic
sustainability of the local communities Respect the rights of indigenous peoples, their culture and land, and
their religious and social customs; provide employment and training
opportunities Ensure that each employee is treated with respect and dignity and is not
subjected to any physical, sexual, psychological or verbal harassment or
abuse Respect employees' right to freedom of association, labour organization,
and free collective bargaining Provide equal pay for work of equal value Recognize the responsibilities of all workers to their families, and
provide for maternity leave, and paternity leave Ensure that their be no barriers to the full participation of women within
the company Participate in the creation of child care centres and centres for the
elderly and persons with disabilities where appropriate Ensure no discrimination on grounds of race, ethnicity, or culture Ensure that persons with disabilities who apply for jobs with the company
receive fair treatment and are considered solely on their ability to do the
job; provide resources and facilities which enable them to achieve
progression in employment in the company Provide training to all employees to conduct their activities in an
environmentally responsible manner Work with organizations concerned with children's rights, human rights and
labour rights to ensure that young workers are not exploited Ensure that a mechanism is in place to address ethical issues of concern
raised by employees Make sure that the company's policies balance the interests of managers,
shareholders, employees, and other affected parties Adhere to international standards and protocols relevant to its products
and services Adopt marketing practices which protect consumers and ensure the safety of
all products Conduct or support research on the environmental impacts of raw materials,
products, processes, emissions and wastes associates with the company and on
the means of minimizing such adverse impacts Make a sustainable use of renewable natural resources such as water, soils
and forests Conserve non-renewable natural resources through efficient use and careful
planning Conserve energy and improve energy efficiency of internal operations and
of the goods and services being sold
A) Universal health care, education, retirement security and employment services to every Global Community citizen
B) Responsible consumption within the Global Community means
C) Earth Ministry of Health
D) An improved democracy for the Global Community citizen
E) The global civil society at the United Nations
F) Tasks of a Global Community citizen
G) Corporate citizen global ethics
H) Consumer responsibility
I) The concept of a global community
J) A society based on equal sharing
K) Science, technology, and engineering have a responsibility for the well-being of humanity
L) The Global Community environmental education program
M) The Global Community is a social, political and religious movement
N) The role of family in conservation
O) Global Community citizenship
P) On the cure for the deadly diseases HIV/AIDS
2) Protection of the global life-support systems
A) Adaptation to climate change
B) Our supply of Oxygen in the air we breathe is being threatened by the burning of oil and gas and the cutting of forests
C) Protection of the global-life support systems
3) Global Ministries
A) Earth Ministry of Health
B) Global ministries for Earth management
C)The formation of glolbal ministries
4) Governance and Earth management
A) Earth management
B) Oil consumption and accountability
C) America, a rogued nation
D) Earth governance
E) Global Community Overall Picture
F) China is next after North Korea
G) Mines and mining the impacts
H) World energy demand
I) The sustainable use of drinking water
J) The global concept of ownership
K) The adoption of world sustainable development
L) Religion and conservation
M) Earth governance
N) The war industry is the mother of all evils
O) Earth Environmental Governance
P) A democratically planned global economy
Q) Profit-based conservation strategies for natural ecosystems
5) Climate change
A) Storing CO2 in terrestrial and ocean systems
B) Adaptation to climate change
C) Global warming: an environmental crime agaisnt humanity
D) Positive actions to decrease the concentrations of greenhouse gases
E) Climate change adaptation
6) Business and trade
A) New way of doing business
B) Profit-based conservation practices
C) Do not become a member of the WTO
D) Global trading practices
E) The policy of private-enterprise solutions to global warming
7) Scale of Human and Earth Rights
A) Primordial human rights
B) Cultural rights and the Scale of Human and Earth Rights
C) Primordial Human Rights on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights
D) Consumer rights on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights
E) Freshwater and clean air are Human and Earth Rights on the Scale
F) The Scale of Human and Earth Rights to replace the UniversaL Declaration
8) Societal sustainability
A) Food production for the Global Community
B) Sound solutions to help manage and sustain Earth
C) A global sustainable development
D) Portal of sustainable development
E) A democratically planned global economy - Societal Sustainability
F) Long term well-being as a solution to world sustainable development
G) Societal sustainability is really about symbiotical relationships
H) Same-sex marriages
9) Overpopulation
A) Our overpopulated planet
B) Agriculture and population increase
C) Our overpopulated planet
10) Earth Court of Justice
A) Justice without borders
B) Earth Court of Justice
11) Peace movement
A) The settling of disputes between nations
B) The Peace Movement is about courage
C) The urgent need for local, regional, national, international peace and security
12) Earth Security
A) Global security policies
B) The media industry and global security
13) Global tax
A) A tobin tax as a powerful instrument of the promotion of sustainable development
B) A Green Tax Shift Policy Approach to financing local-to-global public goods
C) The debt of developing countries - was really a global tax developed countries had to pay to developing countries
1) Criteria to obtain the Global Community Citizenship, issues and factors
A) Universal health care, education, retirement security and employment services to every Global Community citizen
Implemented through the Global Community with built-in mechanisms for optimum input and
oversight guaranteed to all member-states, the Global Community offers a practicable starting point for achieving:
(a) a healthful, sustainable environment for every global community citizen,
(b) universal health care, publicly supported,
(c) education for all based upon individual capability,
(d) creative/productive employment for every global community citizen, and
(e) post-retirement security.
This effort will lead over time to an
escalation of human values and symbiotical relationships transcending money centered economics.
B) Responsible consumption within the Global Community means:
* Awareness of global dynamics, the state of the planet, and the differences of other cultures
Consumers operate in an impersonal market economy where they make choices unburdened by guilt or social obligations;
they just have to be able to pay. But a typical global community consumer see himself/herself as part of a larger whole that is
affected by a collectivity of individual consumption decisions and has to question the global integrity of purchasing a product,
and will decide not to purchase at all if the integrity is being challenged.
* Being concerned with the impact of consumption and production on the environment
* Acceptance of notions of voluntary simplicity and conservation
* Knowing the consequences of resource management decisions
* Living a sustainable life style
* Be aware of the impacts of new and different technologies
* Be aware of the impacts of economic development on the integrity of both developed and developing local indigenous communities, infrastructures and natural environments
* Be aware of the impacts on human rights, political stability, societal well-being, cultural sustainability, familial well-being, quality of life and standards of living of other nations
* Be aware of the impacts of a decision made by a family living in developed country to consume a particular good on the household subsistence, production and community activity of a family living
in a developing country; and be aware if that decision would affect poverty, potable water, food diversity, arable land, security
from war, education, communications
C) Earth Ministry of Health
The Global Community is calling for the immediate formation of the Earth Ministry of Health. The globalization of trade, the extensive
mouvement of people all over the world, the increase of poverty and diseases in developing countries and all over the world, have caused pathogens and
exotic diseases to migrate over enormous distances and now, are an increasing threat to local ecosystems and communities, economies and health of
every human being and all life. The Earth Community Organization, the Human Family, is calling this threat of the upmost importance and
must be dealt with immediately by every nation. We must manage health in the world. We are calling for the immediate creation of the Earth Ministry of Health.
Formation of a Global Ministry of Environmental Health
1. Must be non-profit, grassroots, and at community level.
2. Finances: drug companies and governments.
3. Global Declaration
a) very strict and mandatory
b) all nations participate
c) scientists and professionals in the fields who have dedicated their lives to environmental health
d) humanitarians
4. The functioning of the NGO is as per Manifesto.
D) An improved democracy for the Global Community citizen
The Global Community promotes a culture based on an 'improved democracy', nonviolence, and peace. To achieve our
objectives we recommend to:
1) Strengthen democratic institutions at all levels, and provide transparency and accountability in governance, inclusive participation in decision making, and access to justice
a. Uphold the right of everyone to receive clear and timely information on environmental matters and all development plans and activities which are likely to affect them or in which they have an interest.
b. Support local, regional and global civil society, and promote the meaningful participation of all interested individuals and organizations in decision making.
c. Protect the rights to freedom of opinion, expression, peaceful assembly, association, and dissent.
d. Institute effective and efficient access to administrative and independent judicial procedures, including remedies and redress for environmental harm and the threat of such harm.
e. Eliminate corruption in all public and private institutions.
f. Strengthen local communities, enabling them to care for their environments, and assign environmental responsibilities to the levels of government where they can be carried out most effectively.
2) Integrate into formal education and life-long learning the knowledge, values, and skills needed for a sustainable way of life
a. Provide all, especially children and youth, with educational opportunities that empower them to contribute actively to sustainable development.
b. Promote the contribution of the arts and humanities as well as the sciences in sustainability education.
c. Enhance the role of the mass media in raising awareness of ecological and social challenges.
d. Recognize the importance of moral and spiritual education for sustainable living.
3) Treat all living beings with respect and consideration
a. Prevent cruelty to animals kept in human societies and protect them from suffering.
b. Protect wild animals from methods of hunting, trapping, and fishing that cause extreme, prolonged, or avoidable suffering.
c. Avoid or eliminate to the full extent possible the taking or destruction of non-targeted species.
4) Promote a culture of tolerance, nonviolence, and peace
a. Encourage and support mutual understanding, solidarity, and cooperation among all peoples and within and among nations.
b. Implement comprehensive strategies to prevent violent conflict and use collaborative problem solving to manage and resolve environmental conflicts and other disputes.
c. Demilitarize national security systems to the level of a non-provocative defense posture, and convert military resources to peaceful purposes, including ecological restoration.
d. Eliminate nuclear, biological, and toxic weapons and other weapons of mass destruction.
e. Ensure that the use of orbital and outer space supports environmental protection and peace.
f. Recognize that peace is the wholeness created by right relationships with oneself, other persons, other cultures, other life, Earth, and the larger whole of which all are a part.
5) An 'improved democracy' is one that is based on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Global Community.
6)Live a life as per the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities of the Global Community citizens.
E) The global civil society at the United Nations
The United Nations are to become an instrument for the will of the Peoples, the global civil society, the Global Community, the human family (different ways of expressing the same people), and not the other way around.
Most of the time politicians have no knowledge, experience, and understanding of the global problems. They seek advise from others. Yet politicians make
global decisions or the lack of them during meetings at the United Nations. Politicians become actors on the world scene. Actors taken jobs they
are not qualified to take in reality. They make decisions and they dont understand consequences. They are often being coerced by the United States but
they wrongly think that is cool for their economy. In effect, politicians are threatening the security of all people and all life on Earth.
The global civil society is made of people from all aspects of life who have a greater understanding of the problem whatever it may be. They
know the facts and understanding of the problem. The global civil society is the mind, heart and Soul of humanity, the human family.
They maybe NGOs, businesses, agencies, scientists and professionals, religious groups, or other groups. They should have a voting right during all meetings
of the General Assembly and Security Council at the United Nations. They will be given an important status in the Global Community. Why be with
the UN when you can be with the Global Community to govern the planet?
F) Tasks of a Global Community citizen
Global Community citizens are dedicated in resolving conflicts peacefully, promote democracy, and fight hunger, terrorism, disease, and human rights abuses. In order to bring about the event of peace, the Global Community
is offering other good organizations around the world to work together to bring warring parties to peace. We can accomplish this task by concrete actions such as:
a) tracking armed conflicts within and between nations around the world and offering assistance in dispute resolution;
b) promoting human rights and democracy;
c) monitoring democratic elections; and
d) educating the public about the advantages of a peaceful solution to any conflict.
G) Corporate citizen global ethics
A corporation will now be required to operate its business as per global ehtics:
* Be concerned with issues such as climate change, bio-diversity, pollution prevention and adopt high standards
* Minimize environmental degradation and health impacts
* Be responsible for the environmental impact of its products and services throughout their cycle
* Adopt a wide environmental code, and policies, health and safety practices and procedures aimed at reducing resource and energy
use in each stage of a product or service life-cycle
* Set up appropriate management systems to implement policies
* Conduct annual checks and balances and provide reports to the community
* Respect the political jurisdiction of national communities
* Respect human rights, social and cultural rights
* Recognize its political and economic impact on local communities
* Contribute to the long-term social, cultural, environmental and economic sustainability of the local communities
* Respect the rights of indigenous peoples, their culture and land, and their religious and social customs; provide employment and training opportunities
* Ensure that each employee is treated with respect and dignity and is not subjected to any physical, sexual, psychological or verbal harassment or abuse
* Respect employees' right to freedom of association, labour organization, and free collective bargaining
* Provide equal pay for work of equal value
* Recognize the responsibilities of all workers to their families, and provide for maternity leave, and paternity leave
* Ensure that their be no barriers to the full participation of women within the company
* Participate in the creation of child care centres and centres for the elderly and persons with disabilities where appropriate
* Ensure no discrimination on grounds of race, ethnicity, or culture
* Ensure that persons with disabilities who apply for jobs with the company receive fair treatment and are considered solely on their ability to do the job; provide resources
and facilities which enable them to achieve progression in employment in the company
* Provide training to all employees to conduct their activities in an environmentally responsible manner
* Work with organizations concerned with children's rights, human rights and labour rights to ensure that young workers are not exploited
* Ensure that a mechanism is in place to address ethical issues of concern raised by employees
* Make sure that the company's policies balance the interests of managers, shareholders, employees, and other affected parties
* Adhere to international standards and protocols relevant to its products and services
* Adopt marketing practices which protect consumers and ensure the safety of all products
* Conduct or support research on the environmental impacts of raw materials, products, processes, emissions and wastes associates with the company and on the means of minimizing such adverse impacts
* Make a sustainable use of renewable natural resources such as water, soils and forests
* Conserve non-renewable natural resources through efficient use and careful planning
* Conserve energy and improve energy efficiency of internal operations and of the goods and services being sold
H) Consumer responsibility
Perceiving and understanding the human population in its role as a consumer is very important because consumers collectively spend
two thirds of
a country’s Gross Domestic Product (GDP). They buy and influence the purchase of an increasingly wide array of
products. Despite the fact that we are making consumer decisions in an emerging global community, people are still being taught
how to be "good consumers", when actually the word consume means, "to destroy, use or expend". The enormous productive capacities
and market forces of the planet have been committed to satisfying human needs and desires with little overall regard to the
short-term or long-term future of life on the planet, or life in other nations or in future generations. There are many different
types of consumers and they all need to be taken into account separately: teen, young adult, elderly, low income, disabled,
illiterate, and ethnic. Each type of consumers need to be understood from the point of view of a global perspective; a global
perspective that challenges materialism and promotes ecological responsibility, humanitarianism, well-being, consumer ethics
and the Global Community concepts. These concepts were developed to sustain Earth and they include world conditions, global
problems and issues, global citizenship, stewardship of the ecosystem of the Earth, a moral and a spiritual community,
universal values, and global interconnections.
Consumption in developing countries has risen much faster over decade than in the industrialized countries due to their high rate
of population growth, fast urban development, increased motorization and industrialization. In the OECD countries, a decline in
world prices does not usually stimulate consumption because taxes on oil products account for most of the price to end-users.
The Global Community is concerned with
the sustainability of current levels and patterns of
consumption and with the economic, political, personal, environmental, availability of resources, societal and spiritual impact of
excessive, run-away consumption. About 20% of Earth’s people account for 80% of the world's total consumption. We have
assigned ourselves the task of finding ways to make consumption, consumer rights and responsibilities:
* Fair to the well-being of others
* Socially responsible and sustainable to future
generations
* In line with the universal values
* In line with human rights and responsibilities
Consumers' rights impinge on the rights of other humans living in the Global Community . The right to choice is the consumer
right that refers to the right to have a range and variety of goods and services at competitive, fair prices and variable,
satisfactory quality. In order to assure choice in the developed country markets, governments have implemented trade laws to
facilitate cross border transactions and transnational corporations (TNCs) have set up business off shore so they can lessen the
cost of the production process. The goods that are available in the developed country markets are provided by slave labour, child
labour, sweatshops or in countries that allow the TNCs to forego adhering to pollution or ecological concerns and
human rights in pursuit of profit. Labour rights are abused in efforts to earn more profits. This leads to
abhorrent working conditions, job insecurity and low living standards (all human rights). Consumers in developed countries have
been socialized to want more and more things to consume but have not been socialized to appreciate the impact of their consumption
choices on the human rights of other people; that is, they are not being responsible for their decisions.
The Global Community has proposed that
the idea of sustainability to be a moral and ethical state, as well as an economic
and environmental state, wherein sustainable consumption patterns respect the
universal values of peace, security, justice and equity within the human
relationships that exist in the global village. Put more simply, not only should
consumers be concerned with the impact of their decisions on the environment
but also on the lives and well-being of other people. Since one of the key
functions of families as a social institution is to engage in production (selling
their labour in return for wages) and consumption (using those wages to buy
goods and services), the roundtable would examine the role of families as they
impact sustainable consumption and development. To embrace a moral and
ethical perspective, the family's function of production and consumption has to
be discussed in relation to its other key functions , especially
(a) socialization
of children into adult, roles and
(b) social control of family members so they
are responsible contributing members of society.
I) The concept of a global community
Ever since the early 1990s, the Global Community has researched and developed the concept of 'a global community'. It has since been made a part of the
foundation of the Global Community and is thought as the way of life of the future. The concept is also in the statement of rights and responsibilities of a person
belonging to 'a global community' and to 'the Global Community', the human family. That is, to take such a stand has four parts:
a) I am not just a woman, I am a person, I am citizen of a global community,
b) I am not just a man, I am a person, I am citizen of a global community,
c) We are responsible, accountable and equal persons in every way and,
d) We are citizens of The Global Community.
J) A society based on equal sharing
It was suggested to promote a rotation of Public Employment,
so that it can become equally shared and of real common belonging. On the day in which this new social system would come
to the fore, no longer, for example, public forces (persons that today are also them assumed for life, becoming so
faithful keepers of oligarchyc States) will rage against the demonstrators. The seeds of a new society, without
monopolization and exclusion, based instead on equal sharing and full participation by all, will take root. On that day
even such ambitious aims as to see every woman, every man on Earth having a work, and therefore an income, minimum
guaranted, will become much more easily attainable.
K) Science, technology, and engineering have a responsibility for the well-being of humanity
Science gives a person a set of rules, a way of thinking, a philosophy to look
at the physical universe, to observe and analyze it, and to discover its making,
its functioning, and its structure. The scientific method is very reassuring to
oneself. It gives us the basic reasoning we need in order to make informed and
sound policy and management decisions.
Science has a responsibility for the well-being of humanity. Science is found
everywhere in our societies. Because of science, new technologies and
techniques were developed and used in the market place. The products of
science take important places in all aspects of our lives and actually save lives
every second. They make our lives manageable in a million difeerent ways.
Science has also played a destructive role in our history and is continuing to do
so today. Science, technology and engineering are directly or indirectly
responsible for threats to our environment, for wasteful uses of the Earth's
resources and for wars and conflicts in the world.
Science, technology and engineering are major forces of socio-economic
change. They cause humanity and its social and natural environment to evolve
rapidly and, therefore, they carry serious responsibility and accountability.
They are no longer regarded as benefactors of humanity. Ethical integrity has
declined. In several parts of the world people have become suspicious and are
questioning abuses of various kinds. Many scientists and other professionals
have shown little regard to ethical problems arising from their work and must
become responsible and accountable just like everyone else. There are no
exception. We are all asked in helping humanity and all life on Earth from
complete extinction. It is a common goal.
Researchers and other professionals receive public funding for finding solutions
to problems in society. Public funding should be directed towards very specific
research projects related to the life-support system of the planet and to a more
sustainable biosphere.
Science, technology and engineering must regain public trust, state ethical
responsibilties and become a voice to present and future generations.
The public should be informed about research projects and their wider
implications. All parties involved should collaborate with the public. Strong
legal and moral safeguards must be implemented to discourage unethical
practice and the wrongly use of science, technology and engineering for the
development and manufacturing of mass destruction weapons, and for
experiments which do not respect the dignity of human persons and animals.
Just as for human rights, the respect of the dignity of the human person is at the
root of the ethics of science, technology and engineering. The Scale of Human
Rights is aimed at prohibiting all acts, research projects, technology
development, which do not conform to the ideas of humanity.
L) The Global Community environmental education program
The Global Community has developed a program that takes into account personal, social and environmental aspects
when helping people, in particular children and youth, to adapt to changing ecological,
social, economical, political and other conditions. Environmental education provides a person with knowledge on
and responsibility for the state of the environment, provides guidelines how to behave
appropriately.
Environmental education and raising of environmental awareness are the main columns of a
sustainable society. Environmental films stimulate the emotional perception of ecological
problems and motivate people’s action according to their moral principles and hence
inspire them to preserve the environment for future generations. And this is very important.
If mankind wants to survive, it must take immediate action.
Video film demonstrations promote keen emotional perception and understanding of the
present ecological problems, encourage interesting discussions and, most important, the
wish to solve problems.
M) The Global Community is a social, political and religious movement
Over the past decades various changes have taken place in political, economic and social
institutions. Economic reforms, changes in national policies, and global concerns have
contributed to redefine the roles of these institutions for Sustainable Development. The Global Community
is itself a social, political and religious movement in the sense of having
a broad organizational structure and an ideology aimed at governing. The environmental
movements within the Global Community express the concerns of groups of people
regarding depletion of water, climate change aspects, degradation of land and other
changes in ecosystems affecting traditional patterns of natural resource exploitation. The
Global Community has taken the role of helping these groups in protecting and managing the
environment by coordinating efforts. Earth environmental governance is the most
importance and urgent challenge of the Global Community. The Earth Ministry of the
Environment is proposing a meeting of all the Ministers of the Environment from all nations of the world. Each country
will send their Minister of the Environment to meet during the Global Dialogue 2006, to meet now.
The roundtable discussion also
include experts from interested groups, environmental institutions, policy specialists from
non-governmental organizations, and the public. There is a need to centralize and
coordinate efforts into one Ministry of the Environment: the Earth Ministry of the
Environment. Discussion about the financial support will be a priority. A comprehensive
and reliable system will be proposed to coordinate efforts from all over the world. Anyone
willing to participate in the discussion roundtable may send an abstract/research paper
now. Other topics for discussion:
a) Involvement of major groups in monitoring, assessment and early
warning
b) Major environmental challenges of the 21st Century
c) Civil society involvement
d) Responsibility and accountability of the private sector
e) Global environmental policy-making
N) The role of family in conservation
The Global Community is concerned with all
aspects of family and individual well-being, security and quality of life and the
factors that affect their ability to fulfil their basic functions as a social institution:
socialization; procreation; consumption and production; social control; love,
nurturance and moral; and, maintenance of the household and daily lives. People are members of a global, human
family which engages in a consuming role in a capitalist society. Since
capitalism cannot survive without continuous consumption, consumption has
been deified in our consumer society. If we accept that we live in a human
family, we have to be concerned with the human relationships that emerge
during family functions, especially the function of production and consumption.
The basic argument of this discussion is that people need to change their
approach so that they put people, relationships and sustainability first, and
profits, wealth, growth and progress second or, at the least, strike a better
balance between the two polarities. When this change happens, the goals of
social equity and ecological soundness will become integral with economic
efficiency and consumers will see themselves in relation to
other people and the environment.
O) Global Community citizenship
The Global Community and its world citizens should step away from claiming any specific and unique religious affiliation.
We should promote religious tolerance. Global justice requires the separation of democratic governance and religion.
The Global Community Citizenship is given to anyone who accepts the Criteria of the Global Community Citizenship as a way of life . It is time now to take
the oath of global community citizenship. We all belong to this greater whole, the Earth, the only known place in the universe we can call our home.
Before you make your decision, we are asking you to read very carefully the Criteria of the Global Community Citizenship, make sure you understand
every part of the criteria, and then make the oath of belonging to the Global Community, the human family, and Earth Community.
You do not need to let go the citizenship you already have. No! You can still be a citizen of any nation on Earth. The nation you belong to can be called 'a
global community'. It should be your local global community. But you are a better human being as you belong also to the Global Community, and you have
now higher values to live a life, to sustain yourself and all life on the planet.
You have become a person with a heart, a mind and Soul of the same as that of the Global Community.
The Global Community welcomes you!
The Global Community and its world citizens should step away from claiming any specific and unique religious affiliation.
We should promote religious tolerance. Global justice requires the separation of democratic governance and religion.
The major problems for social democracy today would be to address:
(1) the enormous worldwide wealth gap and the underlying concentration of land and natural resource ownership and
control;
(2) the privatized monetary structures; and
(3) building global governance institutions and financing governance and development in such a way as to
divert funds from military industrial profits to social development and environmental restoration.
P) On the cure for the deadly diseases HIV/AIDS
The International concern on the cure for the deadly diseases HIV/AIDS has been on the increase, but the problems also surrounding the diseases
been on the increase. Better controls must put in place to see that funds are being used efficiently.
2) Protection of the global life-support systems
A) Adaptation to climate change
Scientists will need to become more involved in assessing the viability
of response options aimed at storing excess carbon in terrestrial or ocean
systems. Land use changes from agricultural to forest ecosystems can help to
remove carbon from the atmosphere at rates of 2 to 20 tonnes of carbon per
hectare per year for periods of 50 years or more, until a new ecosystem
equilibrium is reached. Similarly, soil conservation practices can help
build up carbon reservoirs in forest and agricultural soils. Proposals to
extract CO2 from smoke stacks and dispose of it in liquid form in
underground reservoirs or deep oceans also need careful evaluation in terms
of long-term feedbacks, effectiveness and environmental acceptability.
However, much remains to be learned about the biological and physical
processes by which terrestial and ocean systems can act as sinks and
permanent reservoirs for carbon.
The Global Community can contribute in evaluating options and strategies
for adapting to climate change as it occurs, and in identifying human
activities that are even now maladapted to climate.
There are two fundamental types of response to the risks of climate change:
1. reducing the rate and magnitudes of change through mitigating the causes, and
2. reducing the harmful consequences through anticipatory adaptation.
Mitigating the causes of global warming implies limiting the rates and magnitudes of increase in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases,
either by reducing emissions or by increasing sinks for atmospheric CO2. Reducing the harmful consequences can be achieved by
co-operating together with the global ministries on climate change and emergencies.
The Global Community has created global ministries to help humanity be prepared to fight the harmful consequences of a global warming
through anticipatory adaptation. Global ministries on climate change and emergencies are now operating. The ministries
have developed:
1. policy response to the consequences of the global warming, and
The Global Community also proposes that all nations of the world promote the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the criteria to obtain
the Global Community Citizenship. Every global community citizen lives a life with the higher values described in the Scale and the criteria. Global
community citizens are good members of the human family. Most global problems, including global warming and world overpopulation, can
be managed through acceptance of the Scale and the criteria.
2. strategies to adapt to the consequences of the unavoidable climate change.
We need to improve on our ability to:
* predict future anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. While demographic, technological and economic factors
are in many respects inherently speculative, better observations and
understanding of the processes by which human activities directly or
indirectly contribute to emissions are clearly required. These in
particular include emissions from deforestation and agricultural
activities;
* obtain more data on the effect of human emissions on atmospheric concentrations of
greenhouse gases. Not only do we need to reduce the uncertainties about
past and current sinks for emitted greenhouse gases, but we need to
better understand and quantify the long term feedbacks such as CO2
fertilization and physical and biological response to climate change if
we expect to improve our confidence in projections of future
concentrations.
* measure direct and indirect effects of radiative forcing of greenhouse gases and aerosols.
* measure climate sensitivity to changes in radiative forcing.
* measure the response to climate change of biological and physical processes
with the terrestrial and ocean systems
* obtain an early detection of the signal of human interference with the climate
system against the change caused by natural forces or internal system
noise is important in fostering timely and responsible coping actions.
* develop actions to limit emissions of greenhouse gases and prepare to
adapt to climate change. However, stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions will not stabilize
greenhouse gas concentrations and climate but only slow down the rates
of change.
* live with the facts that climate change is unavoidable, atmospheric greenhouse
gas concentrations are already signficantly higher than pre-industrial
levels, and that aggressive efforts to reduce their anthropogenic
emission sources would only slow down the growth in their concentrations, not
stop it. Therefore, policy response to this issue must also include
strategies to adapt to the consequences of unavoidable climate change.
B) Our supply of Oxygen in the air we breathe is being threatened by the burning of oil and gas and the cutting of forests
Losses of biomass through deforestation and the cutting down of tropical forests put our supply of oxygen (O2) gas at risk.
The Earth's forests did not use to play a dominant role in maintaining O2 reserves because they consume
just as much of this gas as they produce. Today forests are being destroy at an astronomical rate. No O2 is created after a forest is put down, and more CO2 is produced in the process.
In the tropics, ants, termites, bacteria, and fungi eat nearly the entire photosynthetic O2 product.
Only a tiny fraction of the organic matter they produce accumulates in swamps and soils or is carried down the rivers
for burial on the sea floor.
The O2 content of our atmosphere is slowly declining.
C) Protection of the global-life support systems
The Global Community has come to realize that peoples live in a world of
increasing interdependence and that our faith is intrinsically related to the
preservation of the global life-support systems and to the survival of all forms
of life. The Global Community is calling upon scientists, tehnologists, technicians,
engineers and all other professionals to create positive actions in their own
fields about using knowledge from all fields of science in a responsible manner
to find sound solutions to human needs and to fulfill aspirations without
misusing this knowledge.
3) Global Ministries
A) Earth Ministry of Health
The Earth Ministry of Health is needed to reduce the threat of new and reemerging diseases and immune micro-organisms. SAR is certainly a new emerging global threat and must be managed before it becomes widespread. There are several factors indicating the need for new global changes in the area of health:
* larger populations of mal-nourished and undereducated people living in substandard housing, unhealthy environmental conditions and inadequate health
services, and poor water supply and sanitation
* rapid increase in international air travel
* globalization of trade
* lowering of standards in the production, handling, and processing of food have heightened the risk of food-borne diseases
* environmental factors and activities such as deforestation, conflict, tourism and migration into remote habitats have increased
exposure to disease
* a global surveillance system
* an emergency section capable of responding to outbreaks of infectious disease anywhere in the world
* a more efficient vaccines program
* research into advanced-generations of antibiotics
* help governments put in place policies to improve the management of medical and public health resources, and to monitor these policies.
Tele-medicine and tele-health can bring the best medical and health knowledge to all areas of the world. Public-private partnerships have been
shown to reduce disease and health costs in developing countries. More research are needed to understand the relationship among disease, ecology
and genetics.
* AIDS awareness programs have to become far more aggressive. AIDS is the leading cause of death in the sub-Saharan Africa and is now
spreading rapidly in Central/Southern Asia and Eastern Europe. Local delivery of anti-retrovirus medicine to developing countries is very
difficult.
* bioterrorism is a threat just as important as a nuclear war and a section of this global ministry must be prepared to respond
quickly and efficiently.
* more research is needed to understand and respond to infectious diseases. Immunization rates are declining in low-income and
middle-income countries. There are more than 30 new and highly infectious diseases that have been identified, such as Ebola and AIDS, and there
are no treatment, cure, or vaccine.
* more research is needed in 20 known strains of diseases such as tuberculosis (TB) and malaria which have developed resistance to
antibiotics due to the widespread use and misuse of these drugs.
* more research is needed in old diseases such as cholera, plague, meningitis, diphtheria, dengue fever, hemorrhagic fever, and
yellow fever as they have reappeared as public health threats after years of decline.
The Global Community has begun to establish the global concepts of symbiotical relationships and global cooperation. An
economically base symbiotical relationship exists between nations of the European Union. Other types (geographical, economical, social, business-like, political,
religious, and personal) may be created all over the world between communities, nations, and between people themselves. There has always been symbiotical
relationships in Nature, and between Souls and the matter of the universe to help creating Earth and life on Earth to better serve God.
The Global Community is inviting you to participate in the formation of global symbiotical relationships between
communities, nations, businesses, or a combination of them. This can be accomplished through the formation of global ministries. We are also
proposing the formation of a political symbiotical relationship between state and the global civil society. A similar relationship already
exists between the Global Community and every member of the Earth Community, also known as the human family, the global civil society.
Any symbiotical relationship is for the good of all, for the good of the 'other'. It is based on a genuine group concern and unconditional support for the individual's well-being ~ a giant leap in human behaviour.
The question is how can we improve the political symbiotical relationship to fulfill its goals? The Charter of the Global Community promotes the values
to achieve its goals. These goals require the promoting and establishment of: global community ethics, mutual respect, respect for life, basic liberties,
justice and equity, caring for the 'other', integrity, responsibility and accountability.
Other symbiotical relationships may be based on common concerns and issues such as: the environment, peace, women's rights,
human and Earth rights, and many more. There is a whole spectrum of possible symbiotical relationships.
Global Dialogues 2000 and 2002 were the first world conferences on sustainable development and Earth management that brought forward
sound solutions to humanity's problems. Symbiotical relationships are needed today and for the long term future of humanity.
A global symbiotical relationship between nations is more than just a partnership, or an economical agreement such as the WTO.
The WTO is about a trade partnership between nations. On the other hand, a global symbiotical relationship between two or more nations can
have trade as the major aspect of the relationship or it can have as many other aspects as agreed by the nations involved. The fundamental criteria is that
a relationship is created for the good of all nations participating in the relationship and for the good of humanity, all life on Earth.
The relationship allows a global equitable and peaceful development.
The emphasis of a global symbiotical relationship is not so much on how much money a nation should have or how high a GDP should be although money
can be made a part of the relationship. We all know developed countries live off developing countries so the emphasis has no need to
stress out the profit a rich nation is making off a poor nation. The emphasis of the relationship should give more importance to the
other aspects such as quality of life, protection of the environment and of the global life-support systems, the entrenchment of the
Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Global Community into our ways of life, justice, peace, spiritual freedom, security, and many other
important aspects as described in the global ministries (agriculture, energy, trade, resources, etc.).
This 21st century is very crucial for humanity as it will determine our survival or not for the next million year. The Global Community is
proposing to the world a way to achieve our survival. The recommendations described here are by no means the only ones.
B) Global ministries for Earth management
The Global Community promotes the formation of global ministries to manage the world affairs in several aspects of our lives: energy, agriculture, environment, health, Earth resources, Earth management,
security and safety, emergencies and rescues, trade, banks, speculation on world markets, peace, family and human development, water resources protection, youth, education, justice, science and technology, finance, human resources, ethics, human
and Earth rights, sustainable development, industry, and manufacturing products, etc. Global ministries will be given power to rule
themselves in harmony with each other. The WTO will not be the only global ministry that can rule on cases related to trade.
C)The formation of glolbal ministries
The formation of global ministries is the most important event in human history. Humanity sees the need to manage the world affairs in several aspects of our lives: energy, agriculture, environment, health, Earth resources, Earth management,
security and safety, emergencies and rescues, trade, banks, speculation on world markets, peace, family and human development, water resources protection, youth, education, justice, science and technology, finance, human resources, ethics, human
and Earth rights, sustainable development, industry, and manufacturing products, etc. Global ministries will be given power to rule
themselves in harmony with each other. The WTO will not be the only global ministry that can rule on cases related to trade. The Global Community, the Human Family, is calling for the immediate formation of the Earth Ministry of Health. The globalization of trade, the extensive
mouvement of people all over the world, the increase of poverty and diseases in developing countries and all over the world, have caused pathogens and
exotic diseases to migrate over enormous distances and now, are an increasing threat to local ecosystems and communities, economies and health of
every human being and all life. The Global Community, the Human Family, is calling this threat of the upmost importance and
must be dealt with immediately by every nation. We must manage health in the world. We are calling for the immediate creation of the Earth Ministry of Health.
There are 51 Ministries listed on our website. Anyone of you may apply for those positions. Choose a Ministry and start defining it completely:
what it will do, why is it needed, the money needed to run it, the people needed, the work it will do all over the world, etc. Each and everyone of us can pick a Minister's position
and find absolutely everything there is to be found about the Ministry. You may create brain-storming exercises in your community to help you. We will gather all our information and create a new Discussion Roundtable for each Ministry and do more discussion and research.
The idea is to pass on to the elected representatives for the Global Community the work we have done to help them govern Earth. This way representatives will have an idea about what to do
before they are elected as representatives to the Global Community. Once they are elected they may want to adopt our research work as
a starting point for governing Earth.
4) Governance and Earth management
A) Earth management
Human activities are influencing the climate to change in many ways. We have transformed entire landscapes. Although our influence is huge our control
is minimal. Having initiated the breakdown of the Ozone layer and having set the global warming of the planet in motion it will be hard to reverse these events. History shows that the
beneficence of the planet cannot be taken for granted. It has always been hospitable to life of a kind, but not always of our kind. The kind of conditions that suit us are very narrow and our influence is
far greater than our control. We are creating global conditions that are threatening all life on Earth. Our manipulations of the Earth atmosphere may generate conditions
that could be suitable to only to bacteria in marshes. It is an enormous mistake to take our present good fortune as a given.
The humans species has to regulate its population by means that are voluntary and benign and has to take along with a fair proportion of
other lifeforms. Proper Earth management will certainly be a necessary tool to achieve our goal. If not there will be a collapse of humanity and of the environment. From now on every global
decision we do will have tremendous consequences on our future.
B) Oil consumption and accountability
Once again, we are asking all the Arab and Moslem nations to unite as one powerful People and to
stop the invasion of your world by using economic means against the United States. We are asking
you to stop selling oil to any country. You will lose in money but at least you will still be in control of
your sates. Do not buy any products, goods and services from the US and their friendly nations, even
Canada.
We are asking all oil producing nations to triple their oil prices. The planet has a problem with global
warming and your share of the responsibility to causing the problem is way higher then anyone else.
Consumers of your product cannot and dont want to be responsible of global warming. We are now
putting the responsibility on to you, and we will make you accountable in every way, like it or not,
especially if you let the US get their hands on your oil resources. Americans are the worst polluters
responsible for global warming. If you cannot be responsible and accountable then you should not be
in charge of the oil resources. And we will come after you! Along with the Peoples of Britain and the
United States, you will be made accountable for the destruction of the global life-support systems.
C) America, a rogued nation
It has become a necessity to implement a total and global embargo on all American consumer products, goods and services, and mass destruction chemicals, nuclear war heads, weapons, war products and war equipment.
The war industry throughout the world must be put to a complete halt and shelved forever from humanity. The Global Community is asking
all peoples never again to buy American products.
What are the reasons for this total embargo?
The United States have lost credibility as a nation able to lead others. They have opted out
of resolving the problems of global warming and going along with all other nations by ratifying the Kyoto Protocol. They have requested the International Court not to include their military as they dont want their soldiers to be taken to Court. In order word, Justice is for everyone else but not for them.
They have created hate in the Middle East, the most ancient civilization and they expect the Global Community to go along with them and pay for a war they are creating for the purpose of taking over the oil resources of the Middle East and, eventually, destroying China. China, another ancient civilization, is their next objective. Americans are obviously racists.
They want the destruction of all ancient civilizations. They also have no respect for the survival of the human species and of all other lifeforms on Earth. They are a culture of violence and war. They are bullies.
The world is wiser and will not harm the United States and the American people. But we will stop them as bullies must be stopped. Humanity has no need for bullies especially when they have the biggest nuclear arsenal and other weapons of mass destruction in the world.
The way things are going now, after they take over the Middle East, Americans will make Adolph Hitler look like a kid in the block. Like President Bush said many times we have to prevent the worst to happen. The worst is for Americans to continue their work of destruction and nation predators.
A short while ago we heard the International Court being told by the United States that American soldiers were not to be taken to Court.
How is it possible that a nation such as the United States can be abstained from Justice? How is it possible that the United Nations would not strongly react to such dismal of Justice?
How is it possible that any nation, anyone at all, should be abstained from Justice? The judicial body is one of three bodies of a democracy: executive, legislative and judiciary. Take Justice out and you dont have a democracy. So how
is it possible that the United States promotes democracy in the Middle East under the condition that there is no Justice as far as they are concerned. America wants to apply Justice
with the help of their military to all of the Middle East nations. But they dont want Justice to be applied to themselves.
This is totally unacceptable! Justice is for everyone and is a universal constant. Justice should also be strongly applied in all aspects of global life: the
environment, the misused of the Earth resources, problems between nations, the creation of new nations, trade and other global ministries.
To answer the question of "How is it possible that the United Nations would not strongly react to such dismal of Justice?" is probably due to the fact
that the UN is not a democracy. It never was a democracy! Justice is non-existent at the UN. The UN is an organization where politicians meet to
receive instruction from the United States about what to do next. The UN follow the US lead because the US has a lot of money and a lot of guns and mass
destruction weapons for sell. So when the US say that Justice does not apply to Americans then all nations comply. Noone at the UN ever thought for one
moment to say that was wrong and to tell Americans that Justice applies to everyone including Americans. The Earth Court of Justice would try President Bush and millions of Americans
for not ratifying the Kyoto Protocol. They have committed the greatest crimes against humanity, against all life on Earth and they must be
tried for their crimes. The United States are also a nation that invaded other nations to take away their resources or for self interests and profit. When they dont use
their military they use their institutions and corporations. That is the reason why there is such a gap between rich and poor countries.
D) Earth governance
The Earth Court of Justice will handle environmental damage cause by the U.S. military action. The Global Community has classified the damage as a criminal
liability for military personnel and/or their contractors. The war industry has become a liability to humanity.
The quality of Earth governance is reflected in each local community worldwide. The Global Community will show leadership by creating
a global civil ethic within the Global Community. The Charter of the Global Community describes all values needed for good global governance:
mutual respect, tolerance, respect for life, justice for all everywhere, integrity, and caring. The Scale of Human and Earth Rights
has become an inner truth and the benchmark of the millennium in how everyone sees all values. The Scale encompasses the right of all people to:
* the preservation of ethnicity
* equitable treatment, including gender equity
* security
* protection against corruption and the military
* earn a fair living, have shelter and provide for their own welfare and that of their family
* peace and stability
* universal value systems
* participation in governance at all levels
* access the Earth Court of Justice for redress of gross injustices
* equal access to information
Governance of the Earth will make the rule of arbitrary power--economic (WTO, FTAA, EU), political, or military (NATO)-- subjected to the rule
of law within the global civil society, the human family. Justice is for everyone and is everywhere, a universal constant.
The Global Community has no intention of changing the status and privileges of state governments. In fact, state governments become primary members of the
Global Community. Global governance can only be effective within the framework of a world government or world federalism. There is no such thing
as global governance through the work of a few international organizations such as the WTO, the EU, or the United Nations dictating
to the rest of the world. These organizations are heading in the wrong direction and are causing conflicts between nations, doing away with democracy,
increasing the gap between rich and poor, and creating a culture of violence worldwide, terrorism being a small example of what they can do.
The Global Community allows people to take control of their own lives. The Global Community was built from a grassroots process with a vision for
humanity that is challenging every person on Earth as well as nation governments. The Global Community has a vision of the people working together
building a new civilization including a healthy and rewarding future for the next generations. Global cooperation brings people together for a
common future for the good of all.
Earth governance does not imply a lost of state sovereignty and territorial integrity. A nation government exists within the framework of an
effective Global Community protecting common global values and humanity heritage. Earth governance gives a new meaning to the notions of
territoriality, and non-intervention in a state way of life, and it is about protecting the cultural heritage of a state. Diversity of cultural
and ethnic groups is an important aspect of Earth governance.
Earth governance is a balance between the rights of states with rights of people, and the interests of nations with the interests of the the Global Community, the human family, the global civil society.
Earth governance is about the rights of states to self-determination in the global context of the Global Community rather than the traditional
context of a world of separate states.
Although the Global Community ensures state governments that it will obey the principle of non-intervention in domestic affairs, it will also stand
for the rights and interests of the people within individual states in which the security of people is extensively endangered. A global consensus to
that effect will be agreed upon by all nation states.
Effective Earth governance requires a greater understanding of what it means to live in a more crowded, interdependent humanity with finite
resources and more pollution threatening the global life-support systems. The Global Community has no other choice but to work together at
all levels. The collective power is needed to create a better world .
E) Global Community Overall Picture
To each global ministry was added the 'Global Community
Overall Picture' which describes the situation in all nations of
the world, and we divided the world into five different regions: North
America, Latin America & the Caribbean, Africa, Europe, and Asia &
Oceania. Each global ministry has a description of what is happening in
the different regions. They are actual facts concerning issues we have
discussed during both global dialogues in years 2000, 2002 and 2004. Issues of the coming
global dialogue are also included in this project. Our work is too
create a plausible scenario(s) of what the world could be between now and
a million years.
Everyone asks so now what is next? Is invading Irak the end of the invasion of the Middle East? Is North Korea part of the invasion?
Was getting their hands on the best oil in the world the only reason of the invasion?
What is next?
China is next. We all knew that from the beginning. Americans need a playground for wars. They want their television screens live filled with
war stories. Another 'Cold War' is on the horizon. It will be good for the American economy. Imagine the money the war industry will be
making with the break up of China, a stable nation economically and politically, a government that can keep over 1.2 billion people living together
peacefully.
G) Mines and mining the impacts
A study made by the Global Community of the ecological accounting and balance sheet for mining has shown that minerals are obtained in a way that:
* uses too much energy
* generates too much pollution and causes significant health and safety problems
* degrades permanently the environment during extraction, refining, and smelting of minerals
* encourages poor regions to yoke their futures
It would be much less costly to recycle discarded materials. It makes no sense to spend so much energy trying to find new mines
when there is an enormous amount of useful metal in cities and landfills. For instance, why do we need to keep gold in safety deposit boxes, bank vaults, and jewelry boxes? There is
more gold in boxes than in underground mines.
Mines have transformed landscapes and the lives of local people who live near mineral deposits. Entire communities have been uprooted
in order to make way for mine projects. People had to forsake traditional occupations and suffer the effects of living beside a mine
that poisons their water supplies or pollutes the air they breathe. Local people who got jobs in a mine had to trade health problems
for an income. Prostitution and drug use are serious problems at mining sites.
In fact, mineral dependence reduces economic growth in developing countries. Extracting raw materials for export is far less lucrative than processing the materials or manufacturing finished goods.
By extracting minerals, countries are essentially running down their stocks of nonrenewable resources.
Mineral exporting-countries become heavily indebted to international lenders and much of what they earn from minerals and other exports never enters the national economy but is used instead to service the external debt.
These countries have typically invested little in social services, such as education and health care, and are beleaguered by conflicts
over resources and political instabilities.
Even though social, economic and environmental costs of mining are high and mineral prices are low, mining operations are still expanding. Mining firms
have profited from direct and indirect subsidies handed out to them by governments. Mining firms benefits a lot from the cheap fuel and from the
roads and other infrastructure made available to them. Even more surprising, mining firms do not usually pay royalties or taxes on profits, and
governments provide immunity to companies against compensation claims. The final hand-out of public money occurs when mines have to close down or
are abandoned, and governments and taxpayers are stuck with cleanup after companies have gone bankrupt or just walked away from
poor projects.
H) World energy demand
World energy demand can be largely fulfilled by renewable energy technologies. There is however a strong opposition to change arising
from the fossil fuel industry and from governments of most oil-producing nations and major fossil fuel users such as the United States and Britain.
There are significant advantages of shifting away from fossil fuels and nuclear energy and toward greater reliance on renewables. Decreasing the impacts of global warming
is certainly the most significant advantage. Global carbon emissions must be reduced at least 70% over the next hundred years to stabilize
atmospheric CO2 concentrations at 450 parts per million (ppm). The sooner societies begin to make the transition from fossil fuels to renewables, the lower will be
the impacts and the associated costs of both climate change and emissions reductions.
Other costs of conventional energy production and use are:
1. degradation of the environment through resource extraction
2. air, soil, and water pollution
3. acid rain
4. biodiversity loss
5. fuelling of the war industry, and therefore a threat to peace and Earth security and, in consequences, a threat to the global life-support systems
6. global economic losses due to natural disasters are in line with events anticipated as a result of global warming
7. nuclear power is one of the most expensive means of generating electricity and is responsible for nuclear accidents, weapons proliferation, and nuclear waste problems
8. political, economic and military conflicts over limited resources such as oil become more important as demand increases
9. reliance on fossil fuels create less jobs; renewables create four times more jobs
10. fossil fuels do not bring electricity in many poor countries but renewables can; no electricity means no access to education,
clean water, improved health care, communications, and entertainment
The United States represents 25 percent of current global emissions, and 36.4 percent of industrial-country 1990 emissions. Withdrawal
from negotiations on the Kyoto Protocol dealt a blow to the Global Community efforts to battle climate change.
The Global Community is interested to enact renewable energy policies that:
a) are consistent and long-term to allow industries and markets to adjust
b) provide access to the electric grid
c) educate and inform the public
d) encourage individual and cooperative ownership of projects
e) establish standards
f) incorporate all costs in the price of energy sources
I) The sustainable use of drinking water
There is a need to add a sociological, political and anthropological dimension to current debates on
the sustainable use of water in the Mediterranean region: Greece, Cyprus, Turkey, Egypt, Israel, Syria, Jordan, Crete, Lebanon, Malta and Iraq.
More specifically, the impacts of human activities on the management of water supplies can have on local populations.
In order to continue living as a species and achieve sustainability we must re-establish our connections with Nature.
The Global Community should develop and implement a program for the restoration of the hydrological cycle on all continents and the cooling of the planet.
The effect will be to stop the drying out of continents.
J) The global concept of ownership
The Global Community needs a basic clarification of First Principles on the concept of "ownership", starting with the principle that the land and natural resources of the planet are a
common heritage and belong equally as a birthright to everyone. Products and services created by individuals are properly viewed as private property.
Products and services created by groups of individuals are properly viewed as collective property.
We can hatch many birds out of one egg when we shift public finance OFF OF private property and ONTO common heritage property. From the local to the
global level we need to shift taxes off of labor and productive capital and onto land and natural resource rents. In other words, we need to privatize labor
(wages) and socialize rent (the value of surface land and natural resources). This public finance shift will promote the cooperatization of the ownership of capital
in a gradual way with minimal government control of the production and exchange of individual and collective wealth. Natural monopolies (infrastructure,
energy, public transportation) should be owned and/or controlled or regulated by government at the most local level that is practical.
The levels of this public finance shift can be delineated thusly: municipalities and localities to collect the surface land rents within their jurisdiction. Regional
governing bodies to collect resource rents for forest lands, mineral, oil and water resources; the global level needs a Global Resource Agency to collect user
fees for transnational commons such as satellite geostationary orbits, royalties on minerals mined or fish caught in international waters and the use of the
electromagnetic spectrum.
An added benefit of this form of public finance is that it provides a peaceful way to address conflicts over land and natural resources. Resource rents should be
collected and equitably distributed and utilized for the benefit of all, either in financing social services and/or in direct citizen dividends in equal amount to all
individuals.
A portion of revenues could pass from the lower to the higher governance levels or vice versa as needed to ensure a just development pattern worldwide and
needed environmental restoration.
In the area of monetary policy we need seignorage reform, which means that money should be issued as spending by governments, not as debt by private
banking institutions. We also need guaranteed economic freedoms to create local and regional currencies on a democratic and transparent basis.
It was suggested to promote a rotation of Public Employment,
so that it can become equally shared and of real common belonging. On the day in which this new social system would come
to the fore, no longer, for example, public forces (persons that today are also them assumed for life, becoming so
faithful keepers of oligarchyc States) will rage against the demonstrators. The seeds of a new society, without
monopolization and exclusion, based instead on equal sharing and full participation by all, will take root. On that day
even such ambitious aims as to see every woman, every man on Earth having a work, and therefore an income, minimum
guaranted, will become much more easily attainable.
K) The adoption of world sustainable development
The Global Community promotes the adoption of world sustainable
development and for strong international cooperation to achieve world sustainable
development. Global cooperation can
facilitate native people's acceptance of rational policies, financial assistances
and advanced technologies provided by the international community and that
international cooperation also can contribute to regulating world population
distribution, improving low population quality of backward countries,
protecting and exploiting natural resources, developing those products and
industries which can cause lower consumption of natural resources and energy
sources with light pollution of environment, and keeping environmental stability
and ecological balance. In a word, international cooperation greatly
contributes to world sustainable development.
L) Religion and conservation
Most conservationists now believe that it is
essential that there be comprehensive discussion not only of environmental
policies, but also of the ethics underlying environmental protection. The Global Community
looks at the importance of the environment in the main sources of Islamic
instruction, namely the Koran and Prophet's Hadiths (teachings). These texts
turn out to be on the side of conservation, the emphasis being on respect for
creation, the protection of the natural order and avoidance of all wasteful
activities which may cause injury to the environment. These positions are
contrasted with the views expressed by political Islam, which has become
influential in a large part of the Muslin world and rejects the conservation
measures advocated by Western writers.
M) Earth governance
The Global Community believes that we have the responsibility of managing Earth. The partnership of government, civil society, and business is essential for an
effective global governance based on global concepts, the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Global
Community. One cannot talk about the governance of the Earth without talking about the most influential bodies or institutions
of the world that actually govern or rule the world today, or have the power to change it and actually do change the world in
many different ways. So we will talk about the United Nations, the major global economies or planetary economic blocks, the
richest people and corporations on the planet, the IMF, the World Bank, the WTO, religions, the debt of the poor nations, the
restoration of the planet and the global life-support systems. And of course we will also talk about sound solutions to the world
problems.
N) The war industry is the mother of all evils
The "war industry" throughout the world must be put to a complete halt and
shelved forever from humanity. The Global Community is asking all peoples
never again to buy there products. The war industry is the "Mother of all
evils in the world". All persons working, directly or indirectly, for the war industry, are responsible
and accountable to humanity and to God for anything happening to their
products after they are sold. Ethical and moral values no longer touch people involved with the war industry. They
dont think that are actually responsible and accountable for spreading evil all
around the world. They think they are "good people", good citizens. Every
single bullet you manufacture you are responsible and accountable for it, all of
you from the President of the company to the employee on the industrial line.
Our Society holds responsibility and accountability as well. And if that bullet
happened to be a nuclear war head then it becomes even more imperative to
held the manufacturer and the people involved responsible and accountable.
It is the same idea for any consumer product in any industry. You manufacture,
produce, mine, farm or create a product, you become responsible and
accountable of your product from beginning to end (to the point where it
actually becomes a waste; you are also responsible for the proper disposable
of the waste).
Throughout the 20th Century, the war industry has created the worse evil
humanity has ever encountered: the business of conflicts and wars. It is a
business that has made trillions of dollars (American) and will continue to do
so. It has no moral value, no understanding about Life, no respect for anyone
or anything, no law except the ones that it makes for itself, and all its products
are meant to kill and destroy. It has sold its products to the enemies for the
purpose of making more profit. It has subdued governments all over the world
to make them buy its products. It has given trade and way of doing
business a bad reputation and, therefore, it is a threat to the establisment of
business. Although the war industry has a good public image, it does not really
matter who is the buyer as long as he pays good money.
The Global Community promotes the abolition of nuclear weapons: security, sustainability and justice in
a nuclear free future.
The Global Community believes it is a necessity to implement a total embargo on all US, Russian
and European Union nations mass destruction chemicals, nuclear war heads,
weapons, war products and war equipment. These are the countries that have
developed and manufactured the weapons of mass destruction. They are also
the countries that have been exploiting the developing countries everywhere in
the world and especially in the Middle East, and without due respect to human
rights and democracy. They are also the countries that have sold weapons of
mass destruction to the poor nations of the Middle East for the purpose of
making a profit.
The "war industry" throughout the world must be put to a complete halt and
shelved forever from humanity. The Global Community is asking all peoples
never again to buy there products.
The Global Community believes that politicians create wars. They send the military to solve their problems, satisfy their interest and needs, and destroy the problems or create new ones to be in line with the war industry lobbying.
The political game is as deadly as the military game. Peace is the worst enemy to both the potical and military people as peace does
not pay for monthly mortgage bills, car payments and lust of the people living off the war industry. It was estimated that in the
United States alone the war industry feed over fifty million Americans and has a monthly budget of more than ten trillion american
dollars. These people are evils.
The Global Community is promoting the settling of disputes between nations through the process of the Earth Court of Justice.
Justice for all is what we want.
Ever since the end of World War I the British tried to
colonize the arabs and Moslems of the Middle East and surroundings. Over the past two years, we have proven in articles of several of our Newsletters that the British and American peoples have tried to invade and colonize
the Arabs and Moslems of the Middle East. Israel is the Trojan Horse to achieve their goal. Back in 1947, the US have coerced the United Nations to create the State of Israel. It was an illegal and arbitrary process (or the lack of it) that created the State of Israel. There was never a Referendum
conducted in the region to find out if there were any reason at all for the creation of Israel (at the time there were only a few Jews in the region) against the will of over one billion Arabs and Moslems. The reason was colonization and invasion of the Middle East for profit and self-interests. Brut and simple exploitation of the people of the Middle East and of their resources.
Another invasion but different than the invasion of Vietnam and of other Peoples by the same invaders. After World War II, at the UN, it was easy for the US to get all the allies on their side. The Five Permanent Members of the UN (Great Britain, France, China, US, Russia) had no objection and all passed the resolution that created the state of Israel.
That was all that was required. No process! All political! Politicians created the State of Israel without any reason except preparing grounds for a
systematic invasion of the Middle East and the exploitation of the Arabs and Moslems and of their resources. In Canada, every province have jurisdiction over
their resources. Ask to the Premier of Alberta what he would say if Ottawa was to create a new agency to manage or take over the resources within his province. He would probably seperate from the rest of Canada and join the US. So why would it be
any different in the Middle East? Dont people from other nations have the rights to own and control their resources? The US do not think so. We are asking the US to justify their action in the Earth Court of Justice (not in the news media which they own and control). We want Justice for all and universal. We want a process
for the creation of new nations. We want the Earth Court of Justice to be an independent and impartial body that will create the process and verify it
for the case of the creation of the State of Israel.
Let us define what is meant by the "war industry". The war industry comprises all persons (a person can be an organization
such as a government, a business, a non-government organization, an institution such as a university or an institute of
technology, or it can be a professional, an individual, or the like) directly or indirectly related to the research, engineering,
production, manufacturing, promoting, selling, use of war products, war equipment, war ships, war planes, or the like. Conflicts
and wars are often created for the exploitation of tax payers of a country and resources, for the purpose of making a profit and
protecting self-interests. The war industry will use every mean possible to survive as an industry.
All persons working, directly or indirectly, for the war industry, are responsible and accountable to humanity and to God for
anything happening to their products after they are sold. Even here in Ontario, Canada, we manufacture weapons and war
products. Workers go home happy after a good day of work. They have to pay for their mortgages and make car payments
and others. They are mostly Christians. When they go to work, they leave their religious beliefs at home. Ethical and moral
values no longer touch them. They dont think that are actually responsible and accountable for spreading evil all around the
world. They think they are "good people", good citizens. Every single bullet you manufacture you are responsible and
accountable for it, all of you from the President of the company to the employee on the industrial line. Our Society holds
responsibility and accountability as well. And if that bullet happened to be a nuclear war head then it becomes even more
imperative to held the manufacturer and the people involved responsible and accountable.
It is the same idea for any consumer product. You manufacture, produce, farm or create a product, you become responsible
and accountable of your product from beginning to end (to the point where it actually becomes a waste; you are also
responsible for the proper disposable of the waste).
People in our society often argue that their manufacturing products and the trading principles or rules that regulate their actions
are all legal! But what about ethical values and moral principles?!
Greed is what drives belonging or involved with the war industry. By making an astronomical profit through the selling of arms,
war products and equipment to all of the Middle East countries, including Iran, Irak and Afghanistan, and by sucessively calling
these old friends their new enemies and terrorists, and destroying their countries, America and Great Britain have shown that
they could never be trusted. Since the Cold War is over, the only American interests in the Middle East are the cheap crude oil
and the protection of Israel. The Jews come first even if it mean to fight and annihilate the entire Islamic Civilization with nuclear
war heads. If you have any doubt that they would do such an atrocious crime, ask the people from Japan and also, ask the
Russians as they have back off from rubbing their noses with those of the American and the British.
Today the war industry is exploiting the issue of terrorism for profit. Everyone knows terrorism cannot be fought by
conventional warfare but that would not deter the industry from saying it is the best way to get rid of terrorists. Our
governments are now spending tax dollars used for social and environmental programs and services to pay for more war
products and equipment. Terrorists have committed the horrible acts of september 11 because the war industry brought terror
in their homeland and is continuing to do so today in Afghanistan and in Palestine. The only way to fight evil is by not buying its products. The industry should die eventually, hopefully. But
now the war industry is organizating a massive international media campaign to make taxpayers pay for their expenses. More
illusions about protecting the humble people from nuclear war heads being sent from one continent to another. The terrorist act
of September 11 has shown that if terrorists wanted to use war heads they would not use intercontinental missiles.
War brings terror to the children and wonen of Afghanistan and Irak. War brings deaths, and destroy everything. War creates more hate
and, therefore, more terrorism. War brings money and wealth to the war makers in the West and the war industry. And the
taxpayers pay for it. Innocent people here in the West and in the Middle East are killed because of the greedy war industry.
O) Earth Environmental Governance
Earth Environmental Governance can only be achieved successfully within the larger
context of sustainable developent and Earth management. All aspects are
inter-related and affect one another. A healthy environment is essential to long term
prosperity and well-being, and citizens in Global Community demand a high level of
ecological protection. This is the 'raison d'etre' of the Scale of Human and Earth Rights. On the Scale,
primordial human rights and the protection of the global life-support systems (ecological rights) are on top of the Scale. They are the
most important aspects.
Primordial
human rights are those human rights that individuals have by virtue of their very existence as
human beings: to live, have security, eat, drink fresh water, breath clean air, and have shelter. These rights
are separate categories than ecological rights, the right of the greatest number of people,
economic rights, social rights, cultural rights and religious rights. Ecological and primordial
human rights are the only rights that have existed unchanged throughout the evolutionary
origin of our species. Any major change would have threatened our very existence. All
other human rights listed here are rights created by human beings and can be changed
depending of new circumstances; they are not stagnant but are rather flexible and adaptive,
and they can evolve. Ecological and primordial human rights of this generation and of future
generations are therefore much more important than any other human rights existing now
and in the future.
P) A democratically planned global economy
Implemented through the Global Community with built-in mechanisms for optimum input and
oversight guaranteed to all member-states, a democratically planned global economy offers the
Global Community a practicable starting point for achieving:
(a) a healthful, sustainable environment for every global community citizen,
(b) universal health care, publicly supported,
(c) education for all based upon individual capability,
(d) creative/productive employment for every global community citizen, and
(e) post-retirement security.
This effort will lead over time to an
escalation of human values and symbiotical relationships transcending money centered economics.
Q) Profit-based conservation strategies for natural ecosystems
The Global Community is promoting a methodological approach to an economic valuation as a framework incentive to enforce profit-based conservation strategies for natural ecosystems.
Biodiversity and Protected Areas exist neither in isolation nor independent of human activities. For local communities, this may
mean conservation represents a hindrance rather than an opportunity for sustainable development and thus lead to increasing
avoidance of the regulatory framework in effect. Changes are needed to conservation practices in order to create a broader
consensus around objectives and practices. One means of doing this is to ensure people adopt profit-based conservation practices.
5) Climate change
A) Storing CO2 in terrestrial and ocean systems
Scientists will need to become more involved in assessing the viability
of response options aimed at storing excess carbon in terrestrial or ocean
systems. Land use changes from agricultural to forest ecosystems can help to
remove carbon from the atmosphere at rates of 2 to 20 tonnes of carbon per
hectare per year for periods of 50 years or more, until a new ecosystem
equilibrium is reached. Similarly, soil conservation practices can help
build up carbon reservoirs in forest and agricultural soils. Proposals to
extract CO2 from smoke stacks and dispose of it in liquid form in
underground reservoirs or deep oceans also need careful evaluation in terms
of long-term feedbacks, effectiveness and environmental acceptability.
However, much remains to be learned about the biological and physical
processes by which terrestial and ocean systems can act as sinks and
permanent reservoirs for carbon.
B) Adaptation to climate change
The Global Community can contribute in evaluating options and strategies
for adapting to climate change as it occurs, and in identifying human
activities that are even now maladapted to climate.
There are two fundamental types of response to the risks of climate change:
1. reducing the rate and magnitudes of change through mitigating the causes, and
2. reducing the harmful consequences through anticipatory adaptation.
Mitigating the causes of global warming implies limiting the rates and magnitudes of increase in atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases,
either by reducing emissions or by increasing sinks for atmospheric CO2. Reducing the harmful consequences can be achieved by
co-operating together with the global ministries on climate change and emergencies.
The Global Community has created the global ministries to help humanity be prepared to fight the harmful consequences of a global warming
through anticipatory adaptation. The global ministries on climate change and emergencies are now operating. The ministries
have developed:
1. policy response to the consequences of the global warming, and
The Global Community also proposes that all nations of the world promote the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the criteria to obtain
the Global Community Citizenship. Every global community citizen lives a life with the higher values described in the Scale and the criteria. Global
community citizens are good members of the human family. Most global problems, including global warming and world overpopulation, can
be managed through acceptance of the Scale and the criteria.
2. strategies to adapt to the consequences of the unavoidable climate change.
We need to improve on our ability to:
* predict future anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases. While demographic, technological and economic factors
are in many respects inherently speculative, better observations and
understanding of the processes by which human activities directly or
indirectly contribute to emissions are clearly required. These in
particular include emissions from deforestation and agricultural
activities;
C) Global warming: an environmental crime agaisnt humanity
* obtain more data on the effect of human emissions on atmospheric concentrations of
greenhouse gases. Not only do we need to reduce the uncertainties about
past and current sinks for emitted greenhouse gases, but we need to
better understand and quantify the long term feedbacks such as CO2
fertilization and physical and biological response to climate change if
we expect to improve our confidence in projections of future
concentrations.
* measure direct and indirect effects of radiative forcing of greenhouse gases and aerosols.
* measure climate sensitivity to changes in radiative forcing.
* measure the response to climate change of biological and physical processes
with the terrestrial and ocean systems
* obtain an early detection of the signal of human interference with the climate
system against the change caused by natural forces or internal system
noise is important in fostering timely and responsible coping actions.
* develop actions to limit emissions of greenhouse gases and prepare to
adapt to climate change. However, stabilizing greenhouse gas emissions will not stabilize
greenhouse gas concentrations and climate but only slow down the rates
of change.
* live with the facts that climate change is unavoidable, atmospheric greenhouse
gas concentrations are already signficantly higher than pre-industrial
levels, and that aggressive efforts to reduce their anthropogenic
emission sources would only slow down the growth in their concentrations, not
stop it. Therefore, policy response to this issue must also include
strategies to adapt to the consequences of unavoidable climate change.
In the light of the U.S.A., Japan and Russia refusal of taking actions to avert certain global
calamity in regard to global warming, the Global Community has decided to trial these
nations for their crimes against humanity. That is politics without borders. We have asked them to ratify the Kyoto Protocol
as it is. Greenhouse gases are accumulating in the Earth's atmosphere as a result of human
activities, and temperatures are rising globally due to these activities. There are plenty of
observable effects of the global warming. Our climate is changing rapidly and has devastating impacts all over the world.
The Earth Court of Justice has listed America as the first nation to be prosecuted for a
global environmental crime. Because the leader of the USA was responsible for not signing
the Kyoto Protocol, President George W. Bush will be first to appear in Court. The reality
here is that every American is on trial here. Every consumer of the deadly gas causing
global warming is on trial. The same goes for every person on Earth using the deadly gas.
The gas is just as deadly as the gas that murdered millions of Jews during World War II. It
is even more deadly as it destroying the global life-support systems of all life on Earth. We
are killing billions of human beings and countless life species. Americans have closed their
conscience to the reality of life on Earth. Justice must prevail to stop the "killing fields". And
therefore they are guilty as charge. That is Justice without borders.
It is a crime against humanity and all life on Earth not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. It is a
terrible crime against the global life-support systems, against the very existence of the next
generations. On the Scale of Human and Earth Rights, the crime is of maximum
importance.
Prosecuting criminals on the basis of universal jurisdiction regardless of a territorial or
nationality nexus required a solid commitment of political will from national governments
and the Global Community.
Once in effect, the Earth Court of Justice will become the principal judicial organ of the
Global Community. The Court will have a dual role: to settle in accordance with international
law the legal disputes submitted to it by national governments, local communities, and in
some special cases by corporations, non-government-organizations and citizens, and to
give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized organs and
agencies.
The Global Community wants to provide a forum where international conflicts could be argued and resolved peacefully. Because
of hatred and mistrust, disputing parties always find it difficult to express constructive ideas or proposals. A face-to-face
meeting may not even be possible. The Global Community offers to be a trusted third party that would carry ideas back and
forth, put forward new proposals until both sides agree. When both parties feel they have gained more than they have lost from
the process, the outcome is a win-win settlement for peace.
D) Positive actions to decrease the concentrations of greenhouse gases
The Global Community has created the Climate Change Ministry, the Earth Ministry of the Environment, and offer
national governments all over the world to coordinate efforts in implementing the Global Community Action Plan with regard to climate change.
There are thousands of actions everyone in Global Community could take right now .
Positive actions:
1) By developing a method of raising global taxes, of redistributing incomes to the poorest communities, of providing debt-free technical
assistance to non-industrial and developing countries to help them out of poverty and to meet environmental and social standards.
2) Aboriginal Peoples as well as everyone else in the world have noticed that the climate has changed over the past years.
They came forward (actions) and said that they too had observed climate changes over the past years and generations. In some countries the temperature has increased
by one or two degrees and natural catastrophes are becoming more and more frequent. Flooding or freshwater scarcity as well as
water pollution are harming the environment of the Third World and developing countries and water and air pollution characterizes the
industrialized regions. Therefore, poor and rich regions are facing a common problem which is linked to climate change, that's why
we should negotiate honestly and find a compromise as quickly as possible. If no
solution is suggested, developing countries like China will
repeat the same mistakes as the developed world. In fact, the latter can expect a higher salary, which will close the gap between rich
and poor regions.
World industrial activity is now profoundly
affecting the atmospheric environment. It is now the population number and industrialization that makes the major impacts on the
atmosphere. The most important changes affecting the atmosphere are due
to the growth in the burning of fossil fuels. The burning of fossil
fuels increases carbon dioxide concentrations and air pollutants. The
clearing of forested lands for agriculture and other purposes has
reduced the amount of carbon absorbed by the forests and contributed to
the increase of atmospheric carbon dioxide. We have disturbed a fragile
balance by causing chemical changes in the global atmosphere.
Urban air pollution is a mixture of several pollutants emitted from different
energy and industrial processes, and of secondary pollutants in the atmosphere.
Some air pollutants are more important than others. At a given concentration
some pollutants are more toxic or more unpleasant. Pollutants have different
effects related to health, ecosystems, economics and aesthetic.
3) Tropical tree plantations may be an important component of the global carbon cycle because they represent a carbon sink that can be
manipulated by humans and they ca mitigate the effects of tropical deforestation, which is the main biotic source of atmospheric
carbon.
Most forest plantations in the tropics are planted with fast growing trees that culminate in volume and biomass production earlier than
natural forests. These high biomass production forests have a high capacity to sequester atmospheric CO2 and hence assist in
mitigating global warming. Sequestration of CO2 in plantations occurs in tree biomass (stems, branch, foliage and roots), forest floor
and as storage in the soil. Young growing forests are one of the best means to removing CO2 (the gas partially responsible for the
greenhouse effect) from the air. Thus planting forests help to reduce the amount of carbon dioxide in the air (by the action of sunlight
on the green chlorophyll organic compound, CO2 is absorbed by trees through the small fissures in the leaves or needless, these gases
are fixed as biomass).
4) By increasing vegetation in urban areas will reduce the urban heat, and the impacts of other urban environmental problems, which
will be exacerbated under climate change. Reducing the urban heat will also reduce the energy demand for space conditioning,
and hence greenhouse gas emissions. Plants directly reduce the urban heat through evaporative cooling but further reduce energy
consumption through shading. The most common strategy to increase urban vegetation is to plant trees at ground level. However,
where space is not available for trees, vegetation can be grown on building roofs, but walls offer far more space, hence vertical
gardening is a viable alternative.
5) The Kyoto Protocol is the latest step in the ongoing United Nations' effort to
address global warming. The effort began with the United Nations' Framework Convention on Climate Change (Convention) signed
during the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992. (The Convention entered into force in 1994 upon the ratification by 50
nations) Despite the continuing scientific debate on the likely occurrence of global warming, the nations took action
under the "precautionary principle" of international law.
The Convention is intended to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations at a level that will prevent dangerous interference with the
global climate system. The time frame is to be
"sufficient to allow ecosystems to adapt naturally to climate change, to ensure that food production is not threatened and to
enable economic development to proceed in a sustainable manner."
The Convention recognises the importance of preserving and enhancing the Earth's natural ability to remove certain greenhouse gases
from the atmosphere by FORESTS and other carbon stocks, referred to as "sinks". The removal by sinks is also a key component of the
Protocol, which allows countries to meet their commitments by considering the effects of afforestation, reforestation and
deforestation since 1990, a provision that is expected to promote cost-effective solutions to climate change and good forestry
practices.
E) Climate change adaptation
The Global Community makes the following recommendations to alleviate the effects of climate change in the world:
1) Introduction of appropriate sustainable agricultural system with balanced use of chemical fertilizers incorporated organic
minerals
and green manure's.
2) Phase wise replacement of chemical fertilizer by organic fertilizer. Similarly biodegradable insecticide should be replace by the
non-biodegradable insecticides.
3) The entrepreneur should take proper mitigation measures of industrial pollution by set-up of industrial waste treatment plant.
4) Control of insect, pests through biological, natural process, alternatives of using harmful insecticides or fungicides is important to
introduce.
5) Promotion of research activities in the field of industrial waste utilization and waste recovery process.
6) Reutilization of agricultural residues through bio-conservation to industrial products.
7) Need proper implementation of Environmental Policy, Environment Conservation Act’s and Legislation.
8) Enhancement of the capacity of NGOs, Govt. agencies to successfully implement poverty alleviation program including non-formal
education on environmental pollution awareness.
9) There are approaches to limit and regulate the pollution emissions of industrial activities. These are standards, taxes and
pollution permits. The choice among these alternatives depends on the administrative structure of a nation.
In an urban community site, air usually
contains materials such as nitric oxide, sulfur oxide, carbon monoxide,
aldehydes, dust and many others. A city would have a department measuring
indicators and indices in order to:
a) Provide a daily report to the public
b) Define air pollution in terms of the amount of pollution created by polluters
c) Define air quality in all parts of the city
d) Measure progress toward air quality goals
e) Propose abatement steps
f) Alarm the public in case of danger
g) Provide data to researchers
h) Provide information for compliance
i) Make intelligent decisions with regard to priorities of programs toward environmental improvement
10) Immediate and honest actions by the USA, Russia, Japan and Canada, and all countries in resolving the problems creating
the greenhouse gases. The ratification of the Kyoto Protocol and the implementation of measurable positive actions
to resolve the problems of global warming.
11) The support of the Climate Change Ministry, the Earth Ministry of the Environment, in coordinating efforts.
6) Business and trade
A) New way of doing business
The spirit of global competition be changed to a spirit of global cooperation; over its long past history trade has
never evolved to require from the trading partners to become legally and morally responsible and accountable for their products from beginning to end.
Now trade must be given a new impetus to be in line with the global concepts of the New Age Civilization. You develop, manufacture, produce, mine, farm
or create a product, you become legally and morally responsible and accountable of your product from beginning to end (to the point where it actually becomes a waste;
you are also responsible for the proper disposable of the waste). This product may be anything and everything.
B) Profit-based conservation practices
Biodiversity and Protected Areas exist neither in isolation nor independent of human activities. For local communities, this may
mean conservation represents a hindrance rather than an opportunity for sustainable development and thus lead to increasing
avoidance of the regulatory framework in effect. A solution requires changes in conservation practices towards a broader
consensus around objectives and practices. One means of doing this is to ensure people adopt profit-based conservation practices.
C) Do not become a member of the WTO
The Global Community is recommending to the developing nations not to make deals with the developed countries. Do not accept money as loans from
the IMF and World Bank. Do not become a member of the WTO. Your best chance for survival is to build sustainable communities in your country. If you do need to make a deal with another nation,
a symbiotical relationship based on economics, make sure it is for the interests of both of you. You have no need of a global membership on any kind. It would destroy you.
D) Global trading practices
The world has become global in most fields of life. Nowadays it is a necessity to
co-operate in resolving global problems which makes global governance a quality
of the New Age Civilization. The next most important achievement of the Human
Family will be the signing of a global agreement on the Scale of Earth Rights.
The Global Community is requesting all members of the World Trade Organization(WTO)
to change their ways by:
1. building social and environmental concerns into the WTO trade rules;
Over its long past history trade has never evolved to require from the trading partners to
become legally and morally responsible and accountable for their products from beginning
to end. At the end the product becomes a waste and it needs to be properly dispose of.
Now trade must be given a new impetus to be in line with the global concepts of the Global Community.
You manufacture, produce, mine, farm or create a product, you
become legally and morally responsible and accountable of your product from
beginning to end (to the point where it actually becomes a waste; you are also
responsible for the proper disposable of the waste). This product may be anything and
everything from oil & gas, weapons, war products, to genetically engineered food
products. All consumer products. All medicinal products! All pharmaceutical products! In
order words, a person becomes responsible and accountable for anything and
everything in his or her life.
2. including ethical and moral safeguards, responsibility and accountability in all situations
and places;
3. developing a global regulatory framework for capitals and corporations;
4. making a transition from global competition to global co-operation which allows
communities the freedom to pursue social and environmental objectives;
5. assuring that globalization and planetary trading blocks serve the Global Community, the
Human Family and not the other way around for the benefit of a few rich people in the
world; and
6. developing a method of raising global taxes, of redistributing incomes to the poorest
communities, of providing debt-free technical assistance to non-industrial and developing
countries to help them out of poverty and to meet environmental and social standards.
E) The policy of private-enterprise solutions to global warming
Carbon dioxide is one of the main culprits for greenhouse gases and the reduction of emissions of this toxic substance has
become the topic of the agenda. Greenhouse gases are released into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuels. Accelerated
industrial activity in many developed and developing countries has dramatically increased the levels of these emissions in the air.
Mass deforestation has also cut the globe’s ability to absorb these gases. The dilemma is how to find ways that permit the
economic growth without jeopardising the environment. Canada along with other 37 countries has ratified the 1997 Kyoto
protocol according to which the emissions of greenhouse gases must be reduced significantly by year 2012. It has adopted the
policy of private-enterprise solutions to the global warming problem.
As the date of reducing significantly the emissions of greenhouse gases is approaching, many wonder whether governments
would ever consider the adoption of some measures to reduce the accelerated deterioration of the atmosphere. It is feared that
the uncontrolled industrial activity may lead to a situation where further economic development would be impossible.
Greenhouse gases believe to cause warming of the Earth’s climate, leading to erratic whether, melting polar caps and drought in
already warm regions. The ecological equilibrium is in jeopardy. From a policy perspective the radical plan hammered out by
politicians in Kyoto is the first concrete initiative to fix targets for a significant reduction of greenhouse gases. Although the
timetable set for gases emissions reductions is considered by some too long and by others too short, the fact of the matter is
that the countries which ratified the Kyoto protocol have not taken, as yet, any concrete measures to the application of the
agreement. Plausible questions arise as to the seriousness of politicians and policy makers to tackle this problem.
Canada is a case in point. It has pledged, under the Kyoto agreement, to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 6 per cent from
1990 levels by 2012. It has opted to use a market where every ton of carbon dioxide that is removed from the atmosphere or
prevented from being emitted is bought and sold on an exchange like the one that already exists in the U.S. for sulphur dioxide
emissions – a market that is now worth an estimated $500-million (U.S.) in trade a year. Under such a regime overpolluters
could offset their reduction obligations with credits. Demand and supply for credits would provide the appropriate incentives
for reducing emissions. Actually, prices, as determined in the auction exchange market, would provide the appropriate signals
for emissions reduction. A strong demand for market credits would push up the price of the units and create a powerful incentive
for others to create more credits by devising innovative means of cutting emissions. Such an environmental regulation provides
incentives for technological change and better environment.
The Kyoto accord has set the bases for a cleaner environment and the participating countries are currently trying to develop the
necessary means for attaining the targets established. The most favoured approach is the use of trading permits. This
private-firm solution is debated by many as far as its efficiency is concerned. Economists, however, demonstrate the superiority
of this approach compared to most direct ones such as taxes and direct penalties. Little progress has been done though world
wide even in the use of this approach. The apparent difficulty lies in the uncertainty surrounding the real threat emanating from
the presence of sulphur dioxide and the sheer size of costs associated with the reduction or the curtailment of the emissions of
gases. Given that the costs are ten times higher than the estimated benefits little interest exists from private firms and
governments to implement the necessary measures for cleaner environment.
The estimated costs and benefits, although valid in a strict economic sense, neglect some important
facets that can make an important difference in the outcome. The benefits arising from the reduction of CO2 emissions are
calculated as the environmental damages that are avoided by preventing rising concentrations of gases. Although costs are
calculated in a more direct way the benefits are at best uncertain. Even the direct benefits are really difficult to calculate, never
mind the indirect ones. Cleaner environment and better standards of living arising out of emissions curtailment are difficult to
quantify accurately. Should such comprehensive calculations were possible we would have a more balanced picture of the true
costs and benefits. The international trade in emission rights reduce the calculated costs without altering drastically the
ecological capital. Weak sustainability is possible and it can be achieved by relying on the market mechanisms, such tradable
pollution permits.
In an ever increasing competitive environment firms have a particular interest and incentive to comply with the Kyoto accord first
before their competitors do so. The competitive advantage thus gained makes them more efficient and financially stronger, not
weaker. The very recent experience with an ever increasing number of firms seeking to strike deals in getting trading permits is
an evidence in point. Such a market is worth more than $60 billion-a-year in the U.S. alone. If politicians agree on clear rules
for international trading, the global market could in time reach a trillion dollars a year. Such a growth in the market of tradable
permits is quite promising as far as weak sustainability is concerned. Governments should abide to concrete and permanent
rules on trading of pollution permits so that polluters and non polluters find the way to trade their permits and reduce the
pollution of the environment. By rendering markets more perfect (information becomes more symmetric) the quality of the
environment in the future can only get better.
7) Scale of Human and Earth Rights
A) Primordial human rights
Throughout the history of humanity, the rights of human beings have been
defined and enshrined with reference to the values of the dignity
of each individual and of freedom, equality and justice. These values
are universal. The Global Community has accepted
and enshrined them into its own ways of behaving and dealing with all peoples.
Cultures and societies differ so much that their expression takes varying
forms, but diversity does not affect the foundation of inalienable values
constituted by human and Earth rights. Each individual is recognized as a representative
of humankind.
Human dignity resides in each of us, and this dignity
must be recognized and respected by all.
As universal values, equality, justice and freedoms are concerned with
our ability to decide, to choose values and to participate in the making
of laws, and they are dependent on the recognition of other people. These
values forbid any form of discrimination on the grounds of race, nationality,
sex, religion, age or mother tongue. By accepting both values of freedom
and equality we can achieve justice. One can be answerable for one's
actions in a 'just' way only if judgements are given in the framework of
democratically established laws and courts. Social justice is another
universal value to which the Global Community aspires and accepts
as a universal value. Social justice consists in sharing wealth with a
view to greater equality and the equal recognition of each individual's
merits. All persons within a given society deserve equal access to goods
and services that fulfill basic human needs.
To determine rights requires an understanding of needs and reponsibilities and their importance. The Scale of Human and Earth and the Charter of the Global Community
are the best guidance for continuing this process. The Scale shows social
values in order of importance and so will help us understand the rights of a community. What are the universal needs of a person, family, a community?
Primordial human rights are necessarily human needs but not all human needs are primordial human rights.
Nevertheless there are very specific primordial human needs. First there are the material needs, the requisites for a dignified life and truly
the primordial human rights:
Then there are the nonmaterial needs which can evolve, and are flexible and adaptive:
Primordial human rights are separate categories from those of ecological rights, community rights, the right of the greatest number of people, economic rights, social rights, cultural
rights and religious rights. Ecological and primordial human rights are the only rights that have existed unchanged throughout the evolutionary origin of our species. Any major change
would have threatened our very existence. All other human rights listed here are rights created by human beings and can be changed depending of new circumstances; they are not
stagnant but are rather flexible and adaptive, and they can evolve. Ecological and primordial human rights of this generation and of future generations are therefore much more important
than any other human rights existing now and in the future.
The existing and future uses of water are constantly challenged; balancing supply and demand is made even harder by the amounts of pollution found in the air, land and waters. A
large part of our body is made of water, and we cannot live without water; therefore water is a primordial human right by our very nature. In order to avoid conflicts and wars over
drinking (fresh)water, fresh water has been categorized as a primordial human right. Industrial pollution plays a major role in the deterioration of nature but this time the level of
pollution is above the carrying capacity of the ecosystem. Pollution also affects significantly human health and all lifeforms on Earth. Every person needs Oxygen to live so clean air is
certainly also a primordial human right by our very nature.
The Global Community promotes a culture based on respect and care for the Global Community of Life.
We are building democratic societies that are just, participatory, sustainable, and peaceful to:
a. Ensure that communities at all levels guarantee human and Earth rights and fundamental freedoms and provide everyone an opportunity to realize his or her full potential.
b. Promote social and economic justice, enabling all to achieve a secure and meaningful livelihood that is ecologically responsible.
c. Educate children to understand a broad panorama of human truths ~ all those universal needs and rights every one shares.
d. Establish the Scale of Human and Earth Rights has an inner truth and the benchmark of the millennium in how we see all values. The Earth Court of Justice will bring security, Peace and Justice for all.
We will no longer fear the unknown as Justice is for everyone and is everywhere, a universal constant.
We will secure Earth's bounty and beauty for present and future generations as we
a. Recognize that the freedom of action of each generation is qualified by the needs of future generations.
b. Transmit to future generations values, traditions, and institutions that support the long-term flourishing of Earth's human and ecological communities.
C) Primordial Human Rights on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights
The Global Community has developed a global strategy to reinforce primordial human rights. Recommendations to that effect are:
* provision of minimal standards of health, education, and housing worldwide
* reduce inequality in access to work opportunities
* care for the quality of life of the people
* all nations must ratify an agreement to form the Earth Court of Justice
* increase global cooperation between nations to deal with terrorism in a more selective, targeted way
* help the Global Community promote and implement its global civic ethic program worldwide
* allow our volunteers perform their global ethical management tasks during conflict resolution
* emphasise social responsibility of corporations in the whole cycle of their products or services
* expand coordination and global cooperation among nations, agencies, and NGOs, regarding information, early warning, apprehension,
and punishment of terrorists through the Earth Court of Justice. The Court will create an environment for transparent Justice.
* when there is massive damage done to a country that is abhorent to most countries of the world then the Earth Court of Justice will find
it justified to go after the suspected criminals wherever they may be hiding
D) Consumer rights on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights
The Global Community stipulates that in a consumer society, one can never have enough and this mind set is not
sustainable; as a caveat, not all consumption is bad; the goal is balanced,
sustainable consumption. Sustainable
consumption encompasses sustainable management of resources,
considerations for the natural environment and societal processes of change,
the promotion of human dignity and human rights, quality of life and the
perspective of interdependence referring to the interplay between people and
environments and the relationships between economies, nationally and
internationally. There is potential tension between one's
consumer rights and their human rights. Consumer rights assume
the existence of human rights. How can one exercise the
consumer right to have a voice in the policy process if they do
not even have a vote or are not allowed to participate in
government? How can they form consumer groups to voice their
opinions collectively if they do not have to right to assemble in
groups in public? How can they demand the right to consumer
education when the education system is such that people cannot
afford to attend, live too far away or there are no schools at all?
This lack of access to education leads to illiteracy and ignorance
in the general sense and, more specifically, lack of consumer
education curricula leads to the inability to acquire knowledge
and skills necessary to be an informed consumer. Also, how can
people exercise their consumer right to information if they cannot
read the information due to lack of the human right to education?
How can consumers exercise their right to express the
consumers' interest if they have been socialized in a planned
economy wherein they do not see themselves in a consuming
role? Exercising this right is exacerbated more so when people
who lived in a planned economy have been forced to convert to a
market economy over night but have not been socialized to
function in a market economy (e.g., Russia and many African
countries). How can people exercise their consumer right to
safety and health in the goods and services they acquire when
they do not even have the human rights of proper sanitation, safe
drinking water, or adequate shelter and clothing? How can people
exercise their consumer right to make choices in the marketplace
if they do not have adequate incomes or steady employment?
More thought provoking, how can people exercise their consumer
right to redress if they do not have the human rights of
recognition as a person under the law or do not have access to
justice? Indeed, all of the consumer rights assume that the human
rights already exist. Both the civil and political and the economic,
social, and to a lesser extent, cultural human rights have to be in
place in order for people to exercise their consumer rights.
Second, and closer to home, there is real tension between
consumers' rights and the rights of other humans; that is,
sometimes one's rights as a consumer impinge on the rights of
other humans living in the global family. Of all of the consumer
rights, the right to choice seems to be the one that impinges the
most on the human rights of other people. The right to choice
refers to the right to have a range and variety of goods and
services at competitive, fair prices and variable, satisfactory
quality. In order to assure choice in the Northern markets,
governments have implemented trade laws to facilitate cross
border transactions and transnational corporations (TNCs) have
set up business off shore so they can lessen the cost of the
production process. Unfortunately, in too many cases, the goods
that are available in the Northern markets were provided by slave
labour, child labour, prison labour and sweatshops or in countries
that allow the TNCs to forego adhering to pollution or ecological
concerns and human rights in pursuit of profit. Worse yet, elitist
governments are often bribed to turn their eyes the other way
leading to situations where labour rights are abused in efforts to
earn more profits. This leads to abhorrent working conditions,
job insecurity and low living standards (all human rights).
Consumers in Northern countries have been socialized to want
more and more things to consume but have not been socialized to
appreciate the impact of their consumption choices on the human
rights of other people; that is, they are NOT responsible for their
decisions. The Global Community needs to focus on human relations and human security and
how they are affected by consumption decisions. For indeed,
the very process of competitive individualistic consumption has
been corrosive of the values that sustain human relationships
and the families, communities.
E) Freshwater and clean air are Human and Earth Rights on the Scale
The Global Community stipulates that air and water are fundamental human and Earth rights.
For centuries we have found it necessary to control water so as to have it where we wanted it.
Despite our efforts, large areas on the planet still suffer from drought, and others from flood, due partly to the nature
variability of climate to change fast than it used to, and this is now impacting on the availability and distribution of water. Our
fresh water sources are already being used and yet, the world population is increasing rapidly. This increase in population and
the increase of pollutants in our drinking water sources have created conflicts which will only become more and more serious
in the near future. In numerous places in the world drinking water sources are rare, sometimes non-existant, and sometimes
were polluted by transnational corporations from our industrialized world and which companies became rich by mining or
manufacturing products in those countries. Should anyone be allowed to control our freshwater resources? Is freshwater a
'human and Earth right' or is it a 'human need'? Should water resources be privatized and commodified for profit? Or
should water be declared a 'human and Earth right' in the Charter of the Global Community? Is it no true that water is
just as important to an individual as the air we breathe?
Freshwater is needed and is a human and Earth right. So is clean air! The Scale of Human and Earth Rights shows how
and where these rights should be included with respect to all other human rights.
Because of an ever-increasing global population and of human impacts on the natural environment, freshwater resources have
become essentials to human life and to all life in Earth. There is an urgent need to protect these resources and for integrated
understanding of lakes, wetlands and flowing waters.
Fresh water resources and clean air are at least if not more important to every human being than any other
human rights ever listed in any charter of any society. If there was a scale of values to be drawn where would you
insert these two human rights?
Human rights are those that individuals have by virtue of their very existence as human beings: to live, eat, drink fresh water,
breath fresh air, have shelter. Just as human beings have human rights, they also have moral, legal responsibilities and related
obligations and accountabilities. Every person needs Oxygen to live so clean air is certainly a primordial human right by our
very nature. A large part of our body is made of water and we could not live without water; therefore water is also a
primordial human rights by our very nature.
Fresh water resources and clean air are therefore proposed to be categorized as human and Earth rights on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights.
F) The Scale of Human and Earth Rights to replace the UniversaL Declaration
The Global Community explained that the introduction of the Universal
Declaration of Human Rights has been a great step in humanity's evolution to better
itself. But now is time to leave it behind and reach to our next step, that is, the Scale of
Human and Earth Rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights causes
confusion in the world between nations. The reason why it causes confusion is that it needs
to be improved. A lot! The West cannot understand many of the things that other nations
do and other nations do not understand the West Way of Life. Why? Because the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights is not so universal after all. And because it does
not have a scale of values.
8) Societal sustainability
A) Food production for the Global Community
We need to form a global ministry dealing only about agriculture and the protection of our soils. All
nations will be part of the ministry. We have to design systems of food production that meet our own needs, and also leave room for these other
lifeforms we want to take along with us. Western agriculture is designed in the end to maximize profit. As a primordial human right, the prime concern of the
human species is to feed people. Therefore we have to do things differently. We will have to produce less livestock as we effectively double
the population we need to feed: ourselves, plus the livestock that is supposed to be feeding us. We also have to apportion the
land surface of the whole world more efficiently, using some for highhly intensive food production (which makes use of less land), some for extensive agriculture
(combining food production with wildlife conservation) and designing some specifically as wilderness areas with global corridors between them.
B) Sound solutions to help manage and sustain Earth
The Global Community has given
back responsibility to every global community citizen on Earth. Everyone shares responsibility for the present and future well-being
of life within Earth Community. We will work together in working out sound solutions to local and global problems. It would be wrong and dishonest to
blame it all on the leader of a country. Most problems in the world must find solutions at the local and global community levels (and not assume that the
leader alone is responsible and will handle it). There is a wisdom in the ways of very humble people
that needs to be utilized. Every humble person deserves to have ideas respected, and encouraged to develop his or her own life for the better.
Sound solutions to help manage and sustain Earth will very likely be found this way. Everyone can help assess the needs of the planet and
propose sound solutions for its proper management, present and future. Everyone can think of better ideas to sustain all life on Earth and
realize these ideas by conducting positive and constructive actions. When there is a need to find a solution to a problem or a concern, a sound
solution would be to choose a measure or conduct an action, if possible, which causes reversible damage as opposed to a measure or an
action causing an irreversible loss; that is the grassroots process. The Global Community Organization can help people realized their actions by
coordinating efforts efficiently together.
C) A global sustainable development
The Global Community believes all citizens have the
right to share the wealth in the world. Foreign investment and the trade agreement must protect and improve social and environmental
rights, not just the economy. A global sustainable development would mean finding a sound balance among the interactions designed to create a healthy
economic growth, preserve environmental quality, make a wise use of our resources, and enhance social benefits. Free trade cannot
proceed at the expense of the environment, labour rights, human rights and the sovereignty of a nation. Free trade will lead to an
increase in poverty by giving investor rights priority over government decision-making. Employers will be looking for more
concessions from workers. Small businesses will find it more difficult to grow and compete against large corporations.
For the first time in human history, and the first time this millennium,
humanity has proposed a benchmark:
* formation of global ministries in all important aspects of our lives
* the Scale of Human and Earth Rights as a replacement to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights
* an evolved Democracy based on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Global Community
* a central organization for Earth management, the restoration of the planet and Earth governance: the Global Community Assessment Centre (GCAC)
* the Earth Court of Justice to deal with all aspects of the Governance and Mangement of the Earth
* a new impetus given to the way of doing business and trade
* more new, diversified (geographical, economical, political, social, business, religious) symbiotical relationships between nations, communities, businesses, for the good and well-being of all
* the event and formation of the human family and the Soul of Humanity
* proposal to reform the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank, the IMF, NAFTA, FTAA, and to centralize them under the Global Community, and these organizations will
be asked to pay a global tax to be administered by the Global Community
* the Peace Movement of the Global Community and shelving of the war industry from humanity
* a global regulatory framework for capitals and corporations that emphasizes global corporate ethics, corporate social responsibility,
protection of human and Earth rights, the environment, community and family aspects, safe working conditions, fair wages and sustainable
consumption aspects
* the ruling by the Earth Court of Justice of the abolishment of the debt of the poor or developing nations as it is really a form of global tax to be paid
annually by the rich or industrialized nations to the developing nations
* establishing freshwater and clean air as primordial human rights
>
D) Portal of sustainable development
It is now mecessary to create the PROFESSIONAL WORLD CENTER FOR STRATEGY OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. The Centre would a portal for LIFE IN STATE OF CHANGE
and would aim at the sustainable development of all people, develop a comprehensive vision for the future of humanity,
help poverty eradication, change consumption and production patterns.
The Global Community needs to build up a widely and freely accessible world information
network. This network could serve to provide monitoring, forecasting and early warning and thus help to implement the principles of
sustainable development(SD). This initiative aims to take up, on a global scale, the building of the information basis for
SD-policy and SD-economy. A priority should be given to the process of creation of a commonly accessible, world-wide system of:
- comprehensive monitoring;
- far-sighted forecasting and
- measurable evaluation
Such a SD-information system should be globally-integrated and territorially distributed. In order to bring about the creation of such an information system, it is essential to carry out a large-scale operation, requiring appropriate developments in science, technology and society at large.
Due to the lack of such an information foundation for the global and local governance, a covert or overt struggle for access to scarce and shrinking natural resources will inevitably grow and accelerate the crisis.
This crisis, if unchecked, will lead to a global catastrophe. The deficit of these resources should, and, we believe can, be eliminated through international cooperation, which should replace the existing competition. That, however, requires not only political will, but also the deepening of a comprehensive and easily accessible knowledge about the consequences of human actions and inactions.
E) A democratically planned global economy - Societal Sustainability
The Global Community promotes a democratically planned global economy - Societal Sustainability - a
democratically planned global economy with built-in mechanisms for optimum input and oversight
guaranteed to all nations.
Human cooperation marshalling with meaning and purpose previously untapped energy and resources on a worldwide scale provides the driving
force for achieving and sustaining a planned global economy democratically embarked upon by all member-states of the United Nations.
It would offer the world community a
rational, effective response to impending trade wars and other instances of human despair arising from the contradiction
between free trade practices and national job protectionism. Launching a democratically planned global economy at the earliest practicable time will
bypass the thirty-year time frame projected for equalizing labor costs between underdeveloped national economies and those of
the more developed national economies - while reversing the deterioration of social and environmental conditions traceable
to an economic system increasingly antithetical to global unity and human aspirations.
F) Long term well-being as a solution to world sustainable development
Solutions to world problems can be found by setting our sights on
long term well-being. That is, by aiming to involve
everyone who needs sustenance in a system that:
* manages necessary materials in continuous cycles,
* uses renewable energy and
* eliminates harmful waste.
It is a question of direction.
G) Societal sustainability is really about symbiotical relationships
Today, serious attention is being given to the concept or ideal of community participation in resource management. Nevertheless, there is still much confusion or doubt as to what really constitutes meaningful participation and who specifically should participate.
To ensure that genuine participation at the local community level, there is a need to recognize and build upon local knowledge and
existing local resource management practices. There is also the need to recognize that participation is a continuous process of
negotiation and decision-making with room for more input as the process unfolds. Effective participation must involve some genuine
power on the part of the participants to influence the outcome of the processes they are involved in. Also, the local community must
be able to define their own ends and establish a firm sense of community ownership of the project itself.
Societal sustainability is really about symbiotical relationships.
The emphasis of a global symbiotical relationship is not so much on how much money a nation should have or how high a GDP should be
although money can be made a part of the relationship. We all know developed countries live off developing countries so the emphasis has no
need to stress out the profit a rich nation is making off a poor nation. The emphasis of the relationship should give more importance to the
other aspects such as quality of life, protection of the environment and of the global life-support systems, the entrenchment of the Scale of
Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Global Community into our ways of life, justice, peace, cultural and spiritual freedom, security,
and many other important aspects as described in the global ministries (health, agriculture, energy, trade, resources, etc.).
A typical global symbiotical relationship between people, institutions, cities, provinces and nations of the world may be what a group
of people, together, wants it to be. It can be a group of people with the same values. It can be
a group of people with the same cultural background, or the same religious background. Or it can be people with different values, cultural
background or religious values and beliefs. The people making a global community may be living in many different locations on the planet. With
today's communications it is easy to group people in this fashion. It can be a village, or two villages together where people have decided to
unite as one global community. The two villages may be found in different parts of the world. It can be a town, a city, or a nation. It can be two or
more nations together. A global community could be a group of Africans, maybe NGOs, or maybe businesses, in one(or several) of the nations
of Africa, who decided to unite with another group(s), or businesses, situated in Canada, or elsewhere in the world. Together they can grow as
a global community and be strong and healthy.
A global symbiotical relationship between two or more nations, or between two or more global communities, can have trade as the major
aspect of the relationship or it can have as many other aspects as agreed by the people involved. The fundamental criteria is that a
relationship is created for the good of all groups participating in the relationship and for the good of humanity, all life on Earth.
The relationship allows a global equitable and peaceful development.
Any symbiotical relationship is for the good of all, for the good of the 'other'. It is based on a genuine group concern and unconditional support
for the individual's well-being ~ a giant leap in human behaviour. The question is how can we improve the political symbiotical relationship to
fulfill its goals? The Charter of the Global Community promotes the values to achieve its goals. These goals require the promoting and
establishment of: global community ethics, mutual respect, respect for life, basic liberties, justice and equity, caring for the 'other', integrity,
responsibility and accountability.
Other symbiotical relationships may be based on common concerns and issues such as: the environment, peace, justice, women's rights,
human and Earth rights, and many more. There is a whole spectrum of possible symbiotical relationships.
Symbiotical relationships are needed today for the long term future of humanity and for the protection of life on Earth.
On the other hand, a global symbiotical relationship between two or more nations can have trade as the major aspect of the relationship or it
can have as many other aspects as agreed by the nations involved.
Intrinsic human cooperation at the core of creative cultural evolution promises to give rise to a new
epoch for humanity defined by societal sustainability and lasting world peace. The biological
basis for human cooperation and symbiotical relationships both validate and underlie evolutionary panaltruism in and beyond
the twenty-first century. Twenty-first century education centered on human empathy and
compassion and a terror-free global community by the year 2010 garners important
impetus from The Golden Rule principle.
The Golden Rule principle, also called the Ethic of Reciprocity by theologians, says: "Dont do to others what you wouldn't want done
to you." Or treat others the way you would want to be treated. The Golden Rule has a moral aspect found in each religion or faith.
It could be used as a global ethic. Paul McKenna, a writer in interfaith dialogue, has found analogues for the golden rule in 13
faiths. These 13 analogue statements are passages found in the scriptures or writings that promote this ethos. Every faith is
unanimous of saying that every individual should be treated with the same respect and dignity we all seek for ourselves. As a
first step in bringing together religious leaders all around the world, the Global Community is presenting here 13 statements that
unify us all in one Golden Rule.
A new symbiotical relationship between religion and the protection of the global life-support systems has begun to take place all over the world.
Religious rituals now support the conservation efforts and play a central role in governing sustainable use of the natural environment.
Major faiths are issuing declarations, advocating for new national policies, and creating educational activities in support of a sustainable global
community. The Global Community is establishing a symbiotical relationship between spirituality and science, between our heart and mind,
and God, between religion and the environment.
The human family is finding its role in the universe, a higher purpose and a meaning. We now can celebrate life.
A sustainable world can be built with the help of a very powerful entity: the human spirit. Community participation generates the energy needed
to sustain the planet and all life. Religious and environmental communities have formed a powerful alliance for sustainability.
Our next objective will be to find statements from all religions that promote the respect, stewardship, protection, ethical and moral responsibility to life and of the environment, the Earth global
life-support systems, and statements that promote a responsible Earth management. We are also asking for specific statements on environmental conservation such as those expressed by the Islamic religion.
Societal sustainability in addressing international terrorism and the creation
of a democratically planned global economy marshals previously untapped human
cooperation, energy, and resources. Investigating, understanding, and eradicating the root
causes of international terrorism entails objective analyses of all social dichotomies ranging in
realm from religious dogmas, to political ideologies, to economic systems.
We are as much alive as we keep the Earth alive.
Chief Dan George
I am a stranger to no one; and no one is a stranger to me. Indeed, I am a friend to all.
Guru Granth Sahib, pg. 1299
In everything, do to others as you would have them do to you; for this is the law and the prophets.
Jesus, Matthews 7:12
Lay not on any soul a load that you would not wish to be laid upon you, and desire not for anyone the things you would not desire for yourself.
Baha'ullah, Gleanings
What is hateful to you, do not do to your neighbour. This is the whole Torah; all the rest is commentary.
Hillel, Talmud, Shabbat 31a
Treat not others in ways that you yourself would find hurtful.
Udana-Varga 5.18
Not one of you truly believes until you wish for others what you wish for yourself.
The Prophet Muhammad, Hadith
Regard your neighbour's gain as your own gain, and your neighbour's loss as your own loss.
T'ai Shang Kan Ying P'ien, 213-218
This is the sum of duty: do not do to others what would cause pain if done to you.
Mahabharata 5:1517
One word which sums up the basis of all good conduct...loving kindness. Do not do to others what you do not want done to yourself.
Confucius, Analeets, 15.23
One should treat all creatures in the world as one would like to be treated.
Mahavira,Sutrakritanga
We affirm and promote respect for the interdependent web of all existence of which we are a part.
Unitarian principle
Do not do unto others whatever is injurious to yourself.
Shayast-na-Shayast, 13.29
H) Same-sex marriages
The only way proponents for same-sex marriages will win their rights is if they protest, mobilize, organize and
build such a powerful, militant movement from below that politicians cannot ignore them!
Finally, it is important to say: We can NOT win alone. But if we unite our struggle with union members fighting to preserve their jobs,
with women fighting to defend abortion rights, with people of color defending affirmative action, then we can! We need to get together
in a mighty front for civil, labor and human rights on an international scale. The problems of this
world know no borders and neither can we.
Working people, women, people of color, immigrants, gays, lesbians, transgenders and transsexuals--altogether we are not a minority or
a "special interest" group! We are the mighty, powerful majority!
9) Overpopulation
A) Our overpopulated planet
Perhaps the most important step towards achieving sustainability for the next million years is to control our population growth.
World overpopulation is now at the turning point and requires from each and every one of us a statement of rights and belonging to the Global Community, the human family:
a) I am not just a woman, I am a person, I am member of a global community
We are not asking here a woman to have only one child like is done in China. No! First of all it does not work in China. The Chinese population is
still increasing. We are asking here to give a woman the choice, the freedom to say no I dont want children, or yes I want to raise a family, and to make that socially acceptable.
For this to work, women must also be given equal rights to men in every way. The Chinese family policy does not work because women were not
given the freedom to choose for themselves and the equal rights to men. Women are 'persons' just like men.
Those men and women who choose to raise a family (one or more than one children, preferably more than one child) will be given all the help society can give them.
b) I am not just a man, I am a person, I am member of a global community
c) We are responsible, accountable and equal persons in every way, and we will manage wisely our population
d) We are members of the Global Community.
The effect of such change in behavior will imply a true acceptance of belonging to the global community and that humanity must step forward as a responsible body for the good of all. The heart, mind and human spirit of the Global Community will
want to be in the forefront of positive actions and human activities to ensure our survival.
This is not new. In many parts of the world a man is no longer seen as the 'head of the family', the 'provider'. Both men and women have taken that role depending of circumstances and social factors. Women are
no longer seen as subservient persons and breeding machines. Women are seen as equal to men. Women's rights protect the equality between a man and a woman.
The Global Community has long recognized that greater equality between men and women is an essential element of slowing down world population
growth. It was observed that fertility rates were falling everywhere women were allowed to determine when and whether they will have children.
Gender inequality also impacts on resource use and the prospects for sustainability and biodiversity protection. Training and education
along with their greater sense of nature ans shelter protection give women the tools they need to make resource use more equitable
and efficient within communities and to mobilize against environmental and health hazards.
The Global Community is dedicated to give women:
a) equal rights
b) access to and control of natural resources and land
c) stronger voices in decisions about sustainable resource use
d) education on impacts of consumerism and sustainable consumption
e) access to modern methods of contraception and reproductive health services
B) Agriculture and population increase
In general, populations of all lifeforms grow exponentially that is by a steady proportion of whatever was there before. When there is
no practical limit on resource then populations usually grow maximally and the only limit is that of the reproductive capacity of the female animal.
About 10,000 years ago, human beings were obliged to commit themselves more or less fully to agriculture and the human population was 5 to 10 million. By the time of Christ, after
only 8,000 years of large-scale agriculture, the human population was 100 to 300 million. After this time, the exponential growth of the population
entered its rapid phase. The billion mark was passed by 1800 A.D. By year 2000, the human population exceeded 6 billion. Thus agriculture allowed
a thousand-fold increase in numbers over a period of 10,000 years.
In practical sense, agriculture cannot feed a human population that has grown beyond the capacity limit. We must ask ourselves whether we can
stop the growth by means that are voluntary and benign, or whether the eventual environmental restraint will be out of our hands. At some questionable time in our future we will
find that our soil will no longer have the nutrients it needs to produce quality food. For some time we may counter this problem by fresh
weathering of rock. Not for long! The loss of lifeforms on Earth will be permanent.
Obviously something has to be done! The Global Community proposes a tight global policy, benignly implemented, or it will be very nasty indeed. In practice, a human
population of 10 to 12 billion would be too uncomfortably high and would add a high strain on world resources. What kind of world population would be reasonable? What goal should
we aim at? A population should be small enough to be sustainable indefinitely and still allow plenty of leeway for ourselves and other lifeforms. It should also be large
enough to allow the formation of healthy civilizations. We propose a world population of 500 million. The policy to apply is for every family to have only one or two children. It would take a thousand years to
reach our goal of a population of 500 million.
C) Our overpopulated planet
Comprehensive population policies are an essential element in a world development strategy that combines access to reproductive health services,
to education and economic opportunities, to improved energy and natural resource technologies, and to healthyer models of consumption and the "good life."
Policies to decrease world population:
Delaying reproduction is important in influencing population growth rates. Over a period of 60 years, if people delay reproduction
until they are 30 years old, you would have only two generations, while if you do not delay reproduction you would have three generations (one generation every 20 years).
Create policies that help decreasing the number of children being born. Policies such as income tax deductions for dependent children and maternity and paternity leaves are essentially pronatalist and should be eliminated.
The Global Community needs to develop a more exciting
synergy between sustainable development, consumption and family
well-being. New concepts (the human family, human
responsibilities, human security, citizenship education) and old
concepts (quality of life, well-being, justice and standard of
living) have been combined in conjunction with a comparative
analysis of the alternative approaches to the GDP as a way to
bring together a collection of viewpoints to understand a family
perspective in sustainable consumption and development.
World overpopulation at the turning point requires each and every one of us to take a stand on rights and on being a
part of to the Global Community, the human family.
To take such a stand has four parts:
a) I am not just a woman, I am a person, I am member of a global community
b) I am not just a man, I am a person, I am member of a global community
c) We are responsible, accountable and equal persons in every way and,
d) We are members of the Global Community.
We need to take this stand for the survival of our species. For sure, the most important step towards achieving sustainability is to control our population
growth. To ensure our survival we must manage our population wisely.
The Global Community proposes a world population of 500 million. It would take a thousand years to reach our goal of a population of 500 million. To achieve our goal will
require from each and every one of us a stand on the rights and on belonging to the Global Community, the human family. If our population was to decrease
as projected here then what other major global problems would be managed automatically?
Overpopulation is the cause of several major global problems such as:
* lack of resources
* poverty
* wars
* climate change
* damage to the global life-support systems
* a lesser quality of life
* threat to security
* lack of good quality soils for agriculture
* polluted air, water and land
* overcrowed cities
* weapons and war products and equipment able to spark global wars
* widespread drug, human and Earth rights abuse, more old and new diseases out of control
There are many related aspects of the global life-support systems that is affected by an overpopulated planet:
* global warming
* Ozone layer
* wastes of all kind including nuclear and release of radiation
* climate change
* species of the fauna and flora becoming extinct
* losses of forest cover and of biological diversity
* the capacity for photosynthesis
* the water cycle
* food production systems
* genetic resources
* chemicals produced for human use and not found in nature and, eventually, reaching the environment with impacts on Earth's
waters, soils, air, and ecology
Some religious people will argue that to reduce human reproduction is to prevent the birth of possible babies, to deny life for the glory of God, and that more
babies means more glory. We understand this view. Our proposal of a world population of 500 million does not in any way contradict God's Plan for
humanity. On the contrary, it reinforces the Will of God for the diversity of Life throughout the universe. By accomplishing our higher purpose we will be
able to propagate trillions of liferforms and much more over the universe. Beside, with such a small population, there is no doubt that our species would last
at least a million years.
That is 500 million x 1 million
But if we let our population rise to about 20 billion then we may not survive more that 1,000 years or so. That is
20 billion x 1,000 thousand
In order words, if we exercise restraint the total number of human beings who will be on the planet could be at least 25 times greater than it
would be if we allowed the population to increase to 20 billion. Who, then, are those who deny life for the glory of God?
10) Earth Court of Justice
A) Justice without borders
The Earth Court of Justice will hear cases involving crimes related to the global ministries.
It will have the power to rule on cases involving crimes related to each one of the ministries.
The invasion of nations such as those of the Middle East and Afghanistan are crimes against humanity and will be prosecuted.
The Earth Court of Justice has listed America as the first nation to be prosecuted for a global environmental crime.
Because the leader of the USA was responsible for not signing the Kyoto Protocol, President George W. Bush will be first to appear in Court.
The reality here is that the way of life of every American is on trial here. A large majority of the consumers in USA are also responsible for producing the deadly gas causing global warming, and they are all on trial. The same goes for every person
on Earth producing the deadly gas. The gas is just as deadly as the gas that murdered millions of Jews during World War II. It is even more deadly as it is destroying
the global life-support systems of all life on Earth. We are killing billions of human beings and countless life species. Americans have closed their conscience to the reality of life
on Earth. Justice must prevail to stop the "killing fields". And therefore they are guilty as charge.
It is a crime against humanity and all life on Earth not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. It is a terrible crime against the global life-support systems, against the very
existence of the next generations. On the Scale of Human and Earth Rights the crime is of maximum importance.
Prosecuting criminals on the basis of universal jurisdiction regardless of a territorial or nationality nexus required a solid
commitment of political will from national governments and the Global Community.
Once in effect, the Earth Court of Justice will become the principal judicial organ of the Global Community. The Court will have a dual role: to settle in accordance with international law the legal disputes submitted to it by national governments, local communities, and in some special cases by corporations, non-government-organizations and citizens, and to give advisory opinions on legal questions referred to it by duly authorized organs and agencies.
The Court will be composed of judges elected by the Elected Representatives Council and
Earth Security Council. It may not include more than one judge of any nationality. The Members of the Court do not represent their governments but are independent magistrates. The judges must possess the qualifications required in their respective countries for appointment to the highest judicial offices, or by jurists of recognized competence in international law. The composition of the Court has also to reflect the main forms of civilization and the principal legal systems of the world.
The Earth Court of Justice will hear cases involving:
* nation states
The Earth Court of Justice will also rule on global problems and concerns such as the creation of a new nation in the
world, and disputing territories or land between nations.
* national political and military leaders accountable for violations of international humanitarian law
* 'core' crimes of genocide
* crimes against humanity and human rights
* war crimes
* crimes with significant impacts perpetuated against the life-support system of the planet (for instance wars and use of weapons of widespread destruction are listed under this category)
* crimes related to the relentless misuse of the Earth Resources
* environmental crimes
* social crimes as the Court may see apply
* crimes stemming from the global ministries
The procedure followed by the Court is defined in its Statute. The Court decides in accordance with:
* the Scale of Human and Earth Rights,
* belief, values, principles and aspirations of the Global Community,
* international treaties and conventions in force,
* international custom,
* the general principles of law,
* as subsidiary means, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists,
* the Statement of Rights and Responsibilities of Global Community citizens, and
* the criteria of a Global Community citizen.
The Statute of the Earth Court of Justice will be established later.
The Earth Court of Justice established by the Charter of the Global Community as the principal organ of the Earth Community
shall be constituted and shall function in accordance with the provisions of the Statute.
B) Earth Court of Justice
The Earth Court of Justice be asked to prohibit the process of market
speculation worldwide, abolish speculation altogether. It can bankrupt a
country's economy in seconds. Speculation should be de-institutionalized.
Humanity has no real need for speculation, and it does way more damage than
good.
11) Peace movement
A) The settling of disputes between nations
The responsibility of a peacemaker is to settle differences through compromise and negotiation before they erupt into violence.
Conflicting views do not have to bring about fighting. War is an irreversible solution to a problem. War is never an appropriate solution to resolve
a conflict.
Politicians create wars. They send the military to solve their problems, satisfy their interest and needs, and destroy the problems or create new ones to be in line with the war industry lobbying.
The political game is as deadly as the military game. Peace is the worst enemy to both the political and military people as peace does
not pay for monthly mortgage bills, car payments and lust of the people living off the war industry. It was estimated that in the United
States alone the war industry feed over fifty million Americans and has a monthly budget of more than ten trillion american dollars.
These people are evils.
The Global Community is promoting the settling of disputes between nations through the process of the Earth Court of Justice. Justice for all is what we want.
Justice withour borders! And politics without borders!
B) The Peace Movement is about courage
The Global Community claims that everyone on Earth should be able to
live in peace. This peace mouvement is about courage. Not the courage it
takes to go into battle but the courage to organize resistance to war when a
bloody taste for it inflames the world, and the threat of prison in a nation where
the human rights and freedom of expression have diminished significantly. It is
about the courage to say NO to the war industry. It is an industry that destroys
life on Earth, corrupts society, and violates morality. Military intervention in the
affairs of other nations is wrong. There are other ways, there are peaceful
ways, ways that are not based on profit-making and the gain of power for
itself. We are conscientious objectors, "nonresistants". That word comes
from Jesus, opposing the use of violence: "Ye have heard that it hath been
said, an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth: but I say unto you, that
ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek,
turn to him the other also."
The Global Community is promoting the settling of
disputes between nations through the process of the Earth Court of
Justice.
C) The urgent need for local, regional, national, international peace and security
The Global Community believes that promotion of peace and sustainable Earth governance can be achieved by community based Heritage Eco-cultural Tourism.
There is an urgent growing need for local, regional, national, international peace and security for evolving strategies for effective Earth
governance. This may be broadly ascribed to the increasing conflicts arising out of social, economic, religious and political factors. Peace
and sustainability, considered as the indicators of development are threatened due to a myriad of conflicts and they are more visible than
ever before, globally. Tourism considered as a Global Peace Industry has greater potentials to reduce these conflicts.
As we enter into the next millennium and the birth of a new global era, we are confronting the urgent need for
local, regional, national, international peace and security more than in the past. This may be broadly ascribed to the increasing conflicts
arising out of social, economic, religious and political factors. The widening gap between the haves and have-nots, have further
accelerated these conflicts. Hence, we are seeking universal human rights and universal human progress and prosperity. One powerful
indicator of such a development is the fact that more people are traveling from more countries than ever before, making travel and tourism
the worlds largest industry. Its growth is expected to continue with globalization and as people everywhere seem determined to exercise
their right to travel and to make their world a more familiar place in the spirit of peace and friendship. Tourism itself has always been a
peace-based industry and may be considered as a Global Peace Industry (ref. www.iipt.org). In the face of current human population
increases and worldwide ecological degradation, intact and healthy ecosystems are becoming the world's most sought-after tourism
destinations. Culture and Heritage besides peace and harmony in such areas attract special groups of tourists, who demand quality
products.
12) Earth Security
A) Global security policies
The Global Community has broadened the traditional focus of the security of states to include both the security of people as well as that of the
planet. Global security policies include:
* every person on Earth has a right to a secure existence, and all states have an obligation to protect those rights
* prevention of conflicts and wars; identification, anticipation, and resolving conflicts before they become armed confrontations. The Earth
Court of Justice will help here.
* military force is not a legitimate political instrument
* weapons of mass destruction are not legitimate instruments of national defence
* eliminate all weapons of mass destruction from all nations and have inspectors verifying progress to that effect
* all nations should sign and ratify the conventions to eliminate nuclear, chemical and biological weapons
* the production and trade in arms should be listed as a criminal act against humanity; this global ministry will introduce a
Convention on the curtailment of the arms trade, a provision for a mandatory Arms Register and the prohibition of the financing or
subsidy of arms exports by governments
* the development of military capabilities is a potential threat to the security of people and all life on Earth; the ministry
will make the demilitarization of global politics a high priority.
* anticipating and managing crises before they escalate into armed conflicts and wars
* maintaining the integrity of the environment and global life-support systems
* managing the environmental, economic, social, political and military conditions that threatened the security of people and the planet
* over the past decades and even now today, all Five Permanent Members of the United Nations Security Council (mostly the United States,
Russia and Britain) were responsible for selling weapons and war equipment. These three nations are required to give back to the Global Community
an amount of 8 trillion dollars (American) as a payment for the immense damage they have caused in the world. They have created a culture
of violence throughout the world. They are nation bullies, nation predators. They are responsible for economic mismanagement, ethnic tensions,
crimes, drug abuse, high unemployment, urban stress, worldwide poverty, and pressures on natural resources. Most conflicts in the world
are direct legacies of cold war power politics, senseless politics. Other conflicts were caused by the end of the cold war and the collapse
of old regimes. Other factors have combined to increase tension: religious, economical, political, and ethnic aspects.
In the past, security was thought as better accomplished through military means. Expanding the military capabilities and forming alliances
with other nations were the only way to 'win'. Today wars are unlikely to produce winners. The Global Community is all over the planet. Ethnic
groups are everywhere. Some say there are more Italians in Montreal, Canada that there are in Italy. So we would fight our own people? Wars truly
make no sense! The world is too crowded and too small nowadays! And weapons too lethal! So security cannot be achieved through the military. The
only job the military should be asked to do today is to protect the global life-support systems. These systems have the highest priority
on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and are certainly more important than any of the other rights on the Scale including security. Simply because without life there is
no other right possible. Without Oxygen there is no life! Without clean water there is no life! So protect life on Earth at all costs.
Wars are the biggest threat to life and the ecosystem of the planet. Primordial human rights come next on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights. Without a shelter life will still exist in some places but is not possible in cold place.
There are many related aspects of the global life-support systems:
* global warming
* Ozone layer
* wastes of all kind including nuclear and release of radiation
* climate change
* species of the fauna and flora becoming extinct
* losses of forest cover and of biological diversity
* the capacity for photosynthesis
* the water cycle
* food production systems
* genetic resources
* chemicals produced for human use and not found in nature and, eventually, reaching the environment with impacts on Earth's waters, soils,
air, and ecology
So security must be achieved by other means than wars. We might as well shelved the war industry from humanity right now and that means phasing
out all nuclear, biological, chemical weapons right now. No waiting! That also means having inspectors verifying the phasing out in
all nations of the world, and not just in some Middle East country. The nature of global security has changed since the rise of the Global Community.
Security used to be about the protection of the state and its boundaries, people, institutions and values from an outside threat.
The Global Community emphasizes as a priority the prohibition of external interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states. Today the security of
people within the Global Community is just as important as the security of states. Citizens must be secure. The Global Community is just as important as the security
and life of citizens and states.
There are many threats to security other than the threats to the global life-support systems and threat caused by weapons of mass destruction and the threats to
the sovereignty of a state, and they include:
* the proliferation of conventional small arms
* the terrorizing of civilian populations by domestic groups
* gross violations of human and Earth rights
Global security can only be achieved if it can be shared by all peoples and through global co-operation, based on principles as explained
in the Charter of the Global Community such as justice, human dignity, and equity for all and for the good of all. All people and states
are protected by the Global Community.
B) The media industry and global security
The media industry includes the movie and television program industry. They are
major sources of global unsecurity. They display a culture of violence in everyday life on television screens and cinemas.
The American Way of Life is creating this culture of violence. An american child at age six year old has seen more violence on television
than any other child of the Middle East over a life span. This culture of violence infects both industrial and developing countries,
rich and poor. This trend of culture of violence must end. The movie and TV industry is a threat to global security. The media is
responsible for the propagation of violence through communications. Why has government not done anyhting to regulate the media industry? Surely everyone understood that on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights security of a
nation is more important than the human rights related to the freedom of expression of the media industry. Security of the people and the state is
on top of the Scale. It is part of the primordial human rights. While freedom of expression is a right found lower on the Scale and is classified partly as
So the freedom of expression of a person is not as important as the security of that person and the security of the state.
* Community rights and the right that the greatest number of people has by virtue of its number (50% plus one) and after voting representatives democratically
(these rights can be and are usually a part of the constitution of a country)
and partly as
* Economic rights (business and consumer rights, and their responsibilities and accountabilities) and social rights (civil and political rights)
13) Global tax
A) A tobin tax as a powerful instrument of the promotion of sustainable development
The Global Community is making a strong case in favour of the introduction of a specific type of tobin tax as a powerful instrument
of the promotion of sustainable development, both directly as well as indirectly. Indirectly, it can discourage financial
speculation and currency crises with their devastating effects on countries; directly, as a tax, the proceeds of it can be used as
an alternative source of sustainable development finance in order to promote the establishment of international public goods.
The original Tobin tax proposal can be made into a feasible instrument by engineering it as a two-tier tax (the so-called Spahn
version of the Tobin tax), with tax collection through the international settlements system.
The global economy can be affected by the deregulation in the movement of capital and thus by speculation. Money is made
off tiny fluctuations in the relative prices of currencies. Speculation makes it possible for huge amounts of money to be
transferred half-way around the world in a matter of seconds. Whereas world trade associated with actual goods and services
is estimated at 7 trillion dollars (US) a year, speculation is estimated at 1.5 trillion dollar a day. If a country's economy starts to slow, billions of
dollars can be transferred out of the country instantaneously, which can significantly affect its economy and the people. This has
been the case in 1997 of a number of East Asia countries. They were bankrupted by speculation. The people were enormously
affected for the worst. Speculation can exert tremendous pressure on the internal politics of a country. It can bankrupt a
country's economy. Speculation should be de-institutionalized. Humanity has no real need for speculation, and it does way
more damage than good. Speculation is a form of gambling and is evil.
B) A Green Tax Shift Policy Approach to financing local-to-global public goods
The Global Community proposes a Green Tax Shift Policy Approach to financing local-to-global public goods.
There is a troublesome and painful contradiction in the lives of many of us who are working for peace, justice, poverty
eradication, debt cancellation and sustainable development. While our hearts and minds focus on building a better world for
everyone, each day we hand over fistfuls of dollars to build weapons of mass destruction, fuel dangerous, dirty and polluting
technologies, and subsidize huge conglomerates which concentrate the wealth of the world in the control of the few. But
together we can end tax tyranny and align our visions and values with how we finance our governments.
Taxation not only raises money to fund government services, it also reflects the overall value system of a society. The goal of
green tax policy is to create a system of public finance which strengthens and maximize incentives for:
* Fair distribution of wealth
* Environmental protection
* Basic needs production
* Provision of adequate government services
* Peaceful resolution of territorial conflicts
Green tax reform makes a clear distinction between private property and common property. Private property is that which is
created by labor. Common property is that which is provided by nature. Green tax policy removes taxes from wages and other
private property and increases taxes and user fees on common property. Reducing taxes on labor increases purchasing
capacity, reducing taxes on capital encourages efficiency. Shifting taxes to land and resources curbs speculation and private
profiteering in our common property and is a practical way to conserve and fairly share the Earth.
Captured in brief soundbites, tax waste, not work; tax bads, not goods; pay for what you take, not what you make; and
polluter pays become tax shift principles readily translated into voter friendly policy recommendations with broadbased political
support.
Green tax policy CUTS taxes on:
* Wages and earned income
* Productive and sustainable capital
* Sales, especially for basic necessities
* Homes and other buildings
Green tax policy INCREASES taxes and fees on:
* Land sites according to land value
* Lands used for timber, grazing, mining
* Emissions into air, water, or soil
* Ocean and freshwater resources
* Electromagnetic spectrum
* Satellite orbital zones
* Oil and minerals
Green tax policy seeks to ELIMINATE subsidies environmentally or socially harmful, unnecessary, or inequitable. Slated for
drastic reduction or complete removal are subsidies for:
* Energy production
* Resource extraction
* Commerce and industry
* Agriculture and forestry
* Weapons of mass destruction
The Global Community is in favour of the introduction of a specific type of tobin tax as a powerful instrument
of the promotion of sustainable development, both directly as well as indirectly. Indirectly, it can discourage financial
speculation and currency crises with their devastating effects on countries; directly, as a tax, the proceeds of it can be used as
an alternative source of sustainable development finance in order to promote the establishment of international public goods.
The original Tobin tax proposal can be made into a feasible instrument by engineering it as a two-tier tax (the so-called Spahn
version of the Tobin tax), with tax collection through the international settlements system.
The Global Community was looking for a method of raising global taxes, of redistributing incomes to
the poorest communities, of providing debt-free technical assistance to non-industrial and developing countries
to help them out of poverty and to meet environmental and social standards, but there it was all along right
on our eyes. The Earth Court of Justice will be asked to decide on the debt be changed into an actual tax to
be paid by the rich nations to the poor nations, and to decide on the amount of tax to be paid. Developing
nations will then be able to start rebuilding their communities as per the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and
the Charter of the Global Community. They will not have to satisfy the economic needs and wishes of the rich
nations. The Earth Court of Justice will also be asked to rule illegal the activities of the IMF, the World Bank and
the WTO unless they become a part of a greater whole such as the Earth Ministry of Financial Institutions, a part
of the future the Global Community. These institutions will be controlled by the greater whole.
C) The debt of developing countries - was really a global tax developed countries had to pay to developing countries
The Earth Court of Justice is required to rule that the debt of the poor nations or 'developing nations' to the rich nations was in actuality a form of global tax and therefore the poor or 'developing' nations dont have to pay it back.
In fact poor nations should expect way more money as tax by the rich nations and not as loans.
The state of the world today is the result of a specific set of interlocking institutions: the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. These institutions are
designed to generate massive wealth for the few and poverty for the rest. The same people who make the decisions in government and corporation make the profit.
They create a tight concentration of power. Together they are a form of anti-government whose only goal is profit. The IMF, through Structural Adjustment Programs, now directly runs the economies of over 70 countries.
That means that about 1000 economists and bureaucrats control the economic policies for 1.4 billion people in these countries. That is a form of anti-government. The people
that profit most from the global economy are white people. The people who are most oppressed by the global economy are people of colour. Racism and sexism have become the norm. The entire
planet is in a state of low intensity civil war.The ruling elite profit off of the exploitation of the rest of the world. The Earth Community Organization was
looking for a method of raising global taxes, of redistributing incomes to the poorest communities, of providing debt-free
technical assistance to non-industrial and developing countries to help them out of poverty and to meet environmental and social standards, but there it was all along right on our eyes. The Earth Court of Justice
will be asked to decide on the debt be changed into an actual tax to be paid by the rich nations to the poor nations, and to decide on the amount of tax to be paid. Developing nations will then be able to start
rebuilding their communities as per the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Global Community. They will not have to satisfy the economic needs and wishes of the rich nations. The Earth Court of Justice will also be asked to rule illegal the activities of the IMF, the World Bank and
the WTO unless they become a part of a greater whole such as the Earth Ministry of Financial Institutions, a part of the future the Global Community. These institutions will be controlled by the greater whole.
Recommendations of Global Dialogue 2002
A) Summary and assessment of recommendations from both Global 2000 and Global Dialogue 2002
B) Recommendations from all Workshop Sessions of Global Dialogue 2002
A) Summary and assessment of recommendations from both Global 2000 and Global Dialogue 2002
The most important sound solutions proposed to the world by the Earth Community Organization for the governance of the Earth are:
a) The establishment of the Scale of Human and Earth Rights as a replacement to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights,
* Primordial human rights
* The ecological rights, the protection of the global life-support systems and the primordial human rights
of future generations
* Community rights and the right that the greatest number
of people have by virtue of their number (50% plus one) and after voting representatives democratically
* Economic rights (business and consumer
rights, and their responsibilities and accountabilities) and social rights
(civil and political rights)
* Cultural rights and religious rights
Formation of a Global Ministry of Environmental Health
1. Must be non-profit, grassroots, and at community level.
2. Finances: drug companies and governments.
3. Global Declaration
a) very strict and mandatory
b) all nations participate
c) scientists and professionals in the fields who have dedicated their lives to environmental health
d) humanitarians
4. The functioning of the NGO is as per Manifesto.
c) The formation of the Earth Court of Justice to hear cases and to prosecute those nations, corporations, communities, individuals who commit crimes
such as:
* nation states
* national political and military leaders accountable for violations of international humanitarian law
* 'core' crimes of genocide
* crimes against humanity and human and Earth rights
* war crimes
* crimes with significant impacts perpetuated against the life-support systems of the planet (for instance wars and use of weapons of widespread destruction are listed under this category)
* crimes related to the relentless misused of the Earth resources
* environmental crimes
* social crimes as the Court may see apply
* crimes stemming from the global ministries
The Court will also be asked to decide on
* the formation of a new nation in the world,
* on disputed lands between nations,
* the de-institutionalization of market speculation, and
* the annulment of the debt of poor or 'developing' nations as the loans are actually a form of global tax given by the rich nations to the poorer ones.
The IMF and World Bank loans are called taxes from the rich nations paid to the 'developing' nations; these loans/taxes are really a method of raising global
taxes, of redistributing incomes to the poorest communities, of providing debt-free
technical assistance to non-industrial and 'developing' countries to help them out of poverty and to meet environmental and social standards.
These loans/taxes are not to be paid back to the rich nations.
The Court decides in accordance with:
* the Scale of Human and Earth Rights,
* the belief, values, principles and aspirations of the New Age Civilization,
* international treaties and conventions in force,
* international custom,
* the general principles of law, and
* as subsidiary means, judicial decisions and the teachings of the most highly qualified publicists.
d) The debt of the poor nations to the rich nations was in actuality a form of global tax and therefore the poor or 'developing' nations dont have to pay it back.
In fact poor nations should expect way more money as tax by the rich nations and not as loans.
The state of the world today is the result of a specific set of interlocking institutions: the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. These institutions are
designed to generate massive wealth for the few and poverty for the rest. The same people who make the decisions in government and corporation make the profit.
They create a tight concentration of power. Together they are a form of anti-government whose only goal is profit. The IMF, through Structural Adjustment Programs, now directly runs the economies of over 70 countries.
That means that about 1000 economists and bureaucrats control the economic policies for 1.4 billion people in these countries. That is a form of anti-government. The people
that profit most from the global economy are white people. The people who are most oppressed by the global economy are people of colour. Racism and sexism have become the norm. The entire
planet is in a state of low intensity civil war. The ruling elite profit off of the exploitation of the rest of the world. The Earth Community Organization was
looking for a method of raising global taxes, of redistributing incomes to the poorest communities, of providing debt-free
technical assistance to non-industrial and developing countries to help them out of poverty and to meet environmental and social standards, but there it was all along right on our eyes. The Earth Court of Justice
will be asked to decide on the debt be changed into an actual tax to be paid by the rich nations to the poor nations, and to decide on the amount of tax to be paid. Developing nations will then be able to start
rebuilding their communities as per the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Earth Community. They will not have to satisfy the economic needs and wishes of the rich nations. The Earth Court of Justice will also be asked to rule illegal the activities of the IMF, the World Bank and
the WTO unless they become a part of a greater whole such as the Earth Ministry of Financial Institutions, a part of the future Earth Government. These institutions will be controlled by the greater whole.
e) Reforming the structure and the voting system of the United Nations to reflect democracy. Democracy of the New Age Civilization will blossom out of the Scale of Human and Earth Rights.
f) Establishing the foundation of Earth Government to govern the world affairs and protect all life,
g) The new and natural evolution of democracy towards a democracy based on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Earth Community,
h) Including moral responsibility and accountability in our ways of life; national governments and large corporations have taken the wrong direction by asserting that free
trade in the world is about competing economically without any moral safeguards and accountability to peoples and the environment.
The proper and only way is for free trade to become a global cooperation between all nations. ECO is proposing a solution that the process of trading within the planetary trading blocks be changed from a
spirit of global competition to that of global economic cooperation. This is the new way of doing business, the new way of life. Earth management is about
"a sound balance among the interactions of the impacts (positive and/or negative), or stresses, on the four major quality systems: People, Economic Development, Environment and Availability of Earth Resources" with the
idea that free trade and the planetary trading blocks are serving the Human Family and not the other way around for self-interests
and the benefits of a few people on Earth, and that is a sound SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT of the world.
i) The spirit of global competition be changed to a spirit of global cooperation; over its long past history trade has
never evolved to require from the trading partners to become legally and morally responsible and accountable for their products from beginning to end.
Now trade must be given a new impetus to be in line with the global concepts of the New Age Civilization. You develop, manufacture, produce, mine, farm
or create a product, you become legally and morally responsible and accountable of your product from beginning to end (to the point where it actually becomes a waste;
you are also responsible for the proper disposable of the waste). This product may be anything and everything.
j) The global economy can be affected by the deregulation in the movement of capital and thus by speculation. Money is made off tiny fluctuations in the relative prices of currencies.
Speculation makes it possible for huge amounts of money to be transferred half-way around the world in a matter of seconds. Whereas world
trade associated with actual goods and services is estimated at $7 trillion a year, speculation is estimated at $1.5 trillion a day.
If a country's economy starts to slow, billions of dollars can be transferred out of the country instantaneously, which can significantly affect its economy and the people. This has been the case in 1997
of a number of East Asia countries. They were bankrupted by speculation. The people were enormously affected for the worst. Speculation can exert tremendous pressure on the internal politics of a country. It can bankrupt a country's
economy. Speculation should be de-institutionalized. Humanity has no real need for speculation, and it does way more damage than good. Speculation is a form of gambling and is evil. It is a horrible thought that we would want
'developing countries' or Moslem nations such as those of the Middle East, to accept our institutions, and we are telling them that our institutions are for
their own good and that they would be in step with progress or the rest of the world. Speculation is an evil institution. We have many other institutions just as evil.
The state of the world today is the result of a specific set of interlocking institutions: the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. These institutions are
designed to generate massive wealth for the few and poverty for the rest. The same people who make the decisions in government and corporation make the profit.
They create a tight concentration of power. Together they are a form of anti-government whose only goal is profit. The ultimate goal of our institutions is to colonize other nations, destroy their economies, bring poverty to the people and
destroy the global life-support systems. The Earth Community Organization is asking the United Nations and all Peoples of the world to
build sustainable communities in their own nations without considering "help" from the West. Your best chance to survive is to create symbiotical
relationships with other nations you can truly trust. Dont believe that their can only be global relationships such as the WTO. There are
no advantages in being a member of the WTO. You can create your own global relationships with partners of your choice and to fit your real needs. No more, no less!
k) Religious leaders and their followers be acquainted and asked to participate in Earth management as per the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Earth Community; how can you not
participate knowing that life is the building block through which you can have a relationship with God, Allah. You must become an activist
for the protection of life on Earth.
l) Promoting and establishing more new, diversified and meaningful symbiotical relationships between nations, communities,and people of the world.
ECO has begun to establish the existence of the New Age Civilization, the age of symbiotical relationships and global cooperation.
An economically base symbiotical relationship exists between nations of the European Union. Other types (geographical, economical,
social, business-like, political, religious, and personal) may be created all over the world between communities, nations, and
between people themselves. There has always been symbiotical relationships in Nature, and between Souls and the matter of the
universe to help creating Earth and life on Earth to better serve God.
m) Promote Peace in the world as a way of life and shelve the war industry forever from humanity.
n) In the light of the U.S.A., Canada, Japan and Russia refusal of taking actions to avert certain global calamity in regard to global warming, the Earth
Community has decided to try these nations for their crimes against humanity. We have asked them to ratify the Kyoto Protocol as
it is. Greenhouse gases are accumulating in the Earth's atmosphere as a result of human activities, and temperatures are rising globally due to
these activities. There are plenty of observable effects of the global warming. And certainly this
ridiculous and false solution of buying environmental credits from each other should not be considered as a way out of resolving the problem.
The ratification is only a beginning to protect the global life-support systems. There is much more to do! But those four countries are not even
coming close to a first start in resolving the problem. And they are amongst the worst polluters on the planet. The Earth Court of Justice has listed America as the first nation to be prosecuted for a global environmental crime.
Because the leader of the USA was responsible for not ratifying the Kyoto Protocol, and because his leadership is questionably believed to be base on his
religious believes, President George W. Bush will be first to appear in Court.
The reality here is that every American is on trial here. Every consumer producing the deadly gas causing global warming is on trial. The same goes for every person
on Earth producing the deadly gas. The gas is just as deadly as the gas that murdered millions of Jews during World War II. It is even more deadly as it is destroying
the global life-support systems of all life on Earth. We are killing billions of human beings and countless life species. Americans have closed their conscience to the reality of life
on Earth. They are showing a bad example to the other nations of the world. Even Canada is following in their steps. Justice must prevail to stop the "killing fields". And therefore they are guilty as charge.
It is a crime against humanity and all life on Earth not to ratify the Kyoto Protocol. It is a terrible crime against the global life-support systems, against the very
existence of the next generations. On the Scale of Human and Earth Rights, the crime is of maximum importance.
o) The Global Community Assessment Centre (GCAC) is the assessment Centre for the Earth Community, the Human Family.
It was created to give individuals or organizations help and/or advice
about negative events happening in their communities which cause concern
to people, resources, industry or the environment.
GCAC is also
the Centre of assessment of local/global indicators about the four
major quality systems: Environment, People,
Economic Development
and the Availability of Resources. The assessment of these indicators
will result in giving the Earth Community a sense of direction
as to ensure a sound future for Earth.In order to do this GCAC will continue to amass a body of scientific
information based on formal assessments such as those on Biodiversity,
Climate Change, Human Development Report, World Development Report, struggle
for Human and Earth Rights, life species Conservation, Health, Economic Analyses,
Commission on Sustainable Development, etc., which have bridged the distance
between incomplete science and contentious policy. Local and global indicators
developed by the Earth Community will also be used as basic scientific
information.Furthermore, no one really understands what assessment processes have
been most effective in the past, or why others have failed. GCAC’s
goal is to explore how assessment of local/global indicators can better link
scientific understanding with the progressive implementation of effective
policy solutions to global changes. Achieving this integration is fundamental.
The Earth Community needs this annual assessment to effectively
manage global changes.
Nowadays we are living in the quite new life-state – in the STATE OF CHANGE. It is the result of big science-technology progress. We are not adapted to live and develop in such new life-conditions. The main cause of global crisis is rapidly pacing moral degradation of existing forms of life not fitted to the new, rapidly changed conditions of life of human and nature. For avoiding global catastrophe and achieving of sustainable development it is necessary to substitute intellectual evolution for social Darwinism. Computer simulation should be in state of change a basic method of selection of developmental undertakings – in "virtual reality", instead of in practice.. Continuation in state of change of old patterns of development through very expensive "trial and error" and putting to the pieces forms of life not fitted to the new life-conditions - in era of globalization lead us to global catastrophe.
For avoiding the global catastrophe we ought to change patterns of development. We - humankind - ought to achieve ethical maturity and symbiotical skill to develop "together with environment (social and/or natural)". For this end we should incorporate into our socioeconomic infrastructure quite new developmental mechanisms – FEED FORWARD and ECOHUMANISTIC value system. We should change patterns of consumption. Consumption of developed parts of world society should be used as a drive of their intellectual, especially innovative, activity. Consumption of weaker parts of world society should allow them reach maturity - education and possibility of their creative partnership cooperation in sustainable development activity.
Nowadays, the approaching dangerous must be eliminated in anticipatory way. Without Earth community partnership and cooperation for common good it is impossible to get access to adequate information and generate big intellectual, innovative creativeness that is indispensable for anticipatory elimination of negative effects of rapidly pacing moral destruction of existing forms of life.
For life in state of change we need efficient and SUBSIDIARITY multilevel GOVERNANCE. This governance must be based on world integrated information system - for aiding sustainable development policy.
For sustainable development we especially have to:
1 - create the possibility of prediction and measurable valuation of complex effects of socioeconomic activity and other changes in life-conditions of human beings and nature,
As a result of it we could reach an opportunity to create new economy – ecohumanistic economy (eco-economy) - based on common good (egoaltruistic, ecohumanistic) value system and complex, long-term calculations of profits and costs (including social and environmental components).
2 - join access to wealth and deficit resources with ecosocial usefulness of creative - especially innovation - activity.
To this end we ought to create, by the UN, the professional World Center for a Strategy of Sustainable Development
The main tasks of this Center ought to be creation of:
1. world integrated (and distributed) warning forecasting system,
2. world information system for prediction and measurable valuation of complex effects of socioeconomic activity and other changes in conditions of life.
3. ecohumanistic economy (eco-economy),
4. system of accumulation of intellectual and material resources that could be necessary for avoiding non predicted dangers.
The creation of World Information Basis for Sustainable Development is essential for avoiding global catastrophe through Inclusive Globalization, eco-economy, sustainable development, multilevel governance and partnership for common good cooperation of world society and Earth community.
p) During the past decades various changes have taken place in political, economic and social
institutions. Economic reforms, changes in national policies, and global concerns have contributed to redefine the roles of these institutions for
Sustainable Development. The 'New Age Movements' are social, political and religious movements in the sense of having a broad organizational structure and an ideology aimed at
governing. The environmental movements within the New Age Movements express the concerns of groups of people regarding depletion of water, climate change aspects, degradation of land and other changes in ecosystems affecting traditional
patterns of natural resource exploitation. The Earth Community has taken the role of helping these groups in protecting and managing the
environment by coordinating efforts. Earth Environmental Governance is the most importance and urgent challenge of the Earth Community.
The Earth Ministry of the Environment is proposing a meeting of all the Ministers of the Environment. Each country in the world will
send their Minister of the Environment to meet during the global dialogue on Earth Management - all Peoples together.
The roundtable discussion will also include experts from interested groups, environmental institutions, policy specialists from non-governmental organizations, and
the public. There is a need to centralize and coordinate efforts into one Ministry of the Environment: the Earth Ministry of the Environment. Discussion about the financial support
will be a priority. A comprehensive and reliable system will be proposed to coordinate efforts from all over the world. Anyone willing to participate in the
discussion roundtable may send an abstract/research paper now.
Other topics for discussion:
a) Involvement of major groups in monitoring, assessment and early warning
b) Major environmental challenges of the 21st Century
c) Civil society involvement
d) Responsibility and accountability of the private sector
e) Global environmental policy-making
Earth Environmental Governance can only be achieved successfully within the larger context of Sustainable Developent and Earth Management. All aspects are
inter-related and affect one another.
A healthy environment is essential to long term prosperity and well-being, and citizens in Earth Community demand a high level of ecological protection. This is the 'raison d'etre' of the Scale of Human and Earth Rights.
Primordial human rights are those human rights that individuals have by virtue of their very existence as human beings: to live,
eat, drink fresh water, breath clean air, and have shelter. These rights are separate categories than ecological rights, the right
of the greatest number of people, economic rights, social rights, cultural rights and religious rights. Ecological and primordial human rights
are the only rights that have existed unchanged throughout the evolutionary origin of our species. Any major change would have
threatened our very existence. All other human rights listed here are rights created by human beings and can be changed depending
of new circumstances; they are not stagnant but are rather flexible and adaptive, and they can evolve. Ecological and primordial human rights
of this generation and of future generations are therefore much more important than any other human rights existing now and in the future.
In this way the Scale of Human and Earth Rights gives us a sense of direction for future planning and managing of the Earth.
Earth management is now well defined and becomes a goal to achieve. We no longer waste energy and resources in things that are
absolutely unimportant.
q) Global consumption is a very important aspect of sustainable development. Consumers
should be concerned with the impact of their decisions on the environment
but also on the lives, human rights and well-being of other people. Since
one of the key functions of families as a social institution is to engage
in production (selling their labour in return for wages) and consumption
(using those wages to buy goods and services), then the role of families
has impacts on sustainable consumption and development.Just as corporations have social responsibilities and so do consumers
in societies. Consumers are socialized to improve the quality of their
lives. Quality of life is a multi-dimensional, complex and very subjective
concept. For instance, someone who has changed their consumption habits
to better ensure that their choices will make a better quality of life
for themselves, the environment and future generations, may be seen by
others as having a lower or inferior quality of life since they have removed
themselves from the materialistic mainstream characteristic of our consumer
society. Someone may feel that an absence of violence and abuse in their
life leads to a higher quality of living even though they have fewer tangible
resources, money, or shelter; peace of mind and freedom from abuse has
increased the quality of their daily life relative to what it was like
before. There are universal quality of life values which lead to "human
betterment" or the improvement of the human condition. In addition to the
value of species survival (human and other living organisms), they include:
adequate resources, justice and equality, freedom, and peace or balance
of power. A better quality of life for all people of Earth Community
is a goal for all of us and one of our universal values. The Earth Community Organization is recommending that global education of all consumers
be a primary goal to Earth Environmental Governance.
r) Fighting against terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.
s) Establishing a global regulatory framework for capitals and corporations that emphasizes global corporate ethics; corporate social responsibility; protection of human and Earth rights, the environment, community and family aspects, safe working conditions, fair wages and sustainable consumption aspects. Designing, monitoring, and implementing checks and balances for corporations.
t) Requiring that the FTAA, the EU and the WTO be governed by the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Earth Community.
The debt of the poor nations to the rich nations was in actuality a form of global tax and therefore the poor or 'developing' nations dont have to pay it back.
In fact poor nations should expect way more money as tax by the rich nations and not as loans.
The state of the world today is the result of a specific set of interlocking institutions: the IMF, the World Bank and the WTO. These institutions are
designed to generate massive wealth for the few and poverty for the rest. The same people who make the decisions in government and corporation make the profit.
They create a tight concentration of power. Together they are a form of anti-government whose only goal is profit. The IMF, through Structural Adjustment Programs, now directly runs the economies of over 70 countries.
That means that about 1000 economists and bureaucrats control the economic policies for 1.4 billion people in these countries. That is a form of anti-government. The people
that profit most from the global economy are white people. The people who are most oppressed by the global economy are people of colour. Racism and sexism have become the norm. The entire
planet is in a state of low intensity civil war. The ruling elite profit off of the exploitation of the rest of the world. The Earth Community Organization was
looking for a method of raising global taxes, of redistributing incomes to the poorest communities, of providing debt-free
technical assistance to non-industrial and developing countries to help them out of poverty and to meet environmental and social standards, but there it was all along right on our eyes. The Earth Court of Justice
will be asked to decide on the debt be changed into an actual tax to be paid by the rich nations to the poor nations, and to decide on the amount of tax to be paid. Developing nations will then be able to start
rebuilding their communities as per the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Earth Community. They will not have to satisfy the economic needs and wishes of the rich nations. The Earth Court of Justice will also be asked to rule illegal the activities of the IMF, the World Bank and
the WTO unless they become a part of a greater whole such as the Earth Ministry of Financial Institutions, a part of the future Earth Government. These institutions will be controlled by the greater whole.
u) Promoting moral responsibility and accountability in the ways of dealing between nations.
v) Requiring that the creation of a new nation and problems between nations be handled by the Earth Court of Justice.
w) Establishing the Earth Resources Ministry that will be assessing, compiling, managing and protecting Earth resources, and the Earth Court of Justice prosecuting cases involving crimes related to the relentless misused of the Earth resources.
x) Promoting and establishing a worldwide framework for the restoration of the planet, our home.
y) Establishing freshwater and clean air as human and Earth rights. Both are a part of the ecological and the primordial human rights, and therefore are the most important rights on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights.
z) Abolition of Nuclear Weapons: security, sustainability and justice in a nuclear free future.
aa) For their relentless exploitation of the Moslem nations of the Middle East and of Afghanistan to make an immoral profit and obtain power at all costs, for having abused and killed and being the cause of the deaths of millions of Moslems in that region, for having invaded Moslem nations which itself is a horrible crime
against humanity, against all human rights, and against democracy and freedom of a people to exist, and for the hate they have created in the heart and mind of every person in the Moslem Civilization, it is recommended that America, Israel, Great Britain, Germany, France and Russia pay eight trillion dollars(American) toward
building sustainable communities in the region. The Earth Community shall administer the amount paid and manage the project. It is also recommended that the people from America, Israel, Great Britain, Germany, France and Russia who have been involved with the exploitation and invasion of the Middle East and surroundings be try for
their crimes against humanity by the Earth Court of Justice.
ab) Immediate withdrawal of all invading troops from the Middle East and Afghanistan.
ac) Free trade and the Way of Life of the West that is, the way of doing business, have been given a bad reputation in the world, especially in the Middle East where oil and arms sales have always been
strategic interests of several Western nations. The West has relentlessly exploited the oil producing nations of the Middle East. By their behavior and ways of doing things, America and the European Union nations have shown that free trade and globalization
meant the absence of ethical and moral values, the absence of responsibility and accountability to products and people, abuses of human rights, cause for terrorism, social and economic injustice, poverty, and pollution. They have given to trade a bad name. The Earth Community
is requesting all members of the World Trade Organization(WTO) to change their ways by:
1. building social and environmental concerns into the WTO trade rules;
2. including ethical and moral values, responsibility and accountability in all situations and places;
3. developing a global regulatory framework for capitals and corporations;
4. making a transition from global competition to global co-operation which allows communities the freedom to pursue social and environmental objectives;
5. assuring that globalization and planetary trading blocks serve the Earth Community, the Human Family; and
6. developing a method of raising global taxes, of redistributing incomes to the poorest communities, of providing debt-free technical assistance to non-industrial
and developing countries to help them out of poverty and to meet environmental and social standards.
ad) The war industry is the "mother of all evils" of our world. It must be shelved. War products and equipment from all nations must be decommissioned.
Join the Peace Movement of the Earth Community. Today the war industry is exploiting the issue of terrorism for profit. Everyone knows terrorism cannot be fought by conventional warfare but that
would not deter the industry from saying it is the best way to get rid of terrorists. Our governments are now spending tax dollars used for social and environmental
programs and services to pay for more war products and equipment. Terrorists have committed the horrible acts of september 11 because the war industry
brought terror in their homeland and is continuing to do so today in Afghanistan and in Palestine. In the "Letter to the people of the Middle East", the
Earth Community has asked Muslims not to buy war products and equipment from the West or from any country in the world. The only way to fight evil is by not buying its products.
The industry should die eventually, hopefully. But now the war industry is organizating a massive international media campaign to make taxpayers
pay for their expenses. More illusions about protecting the humble people from nuclear war heads being sent from one continent to another. The terrorist act of September 11
has shown that if terrorists wanted to use war heads they would not use intercontinental missiles. Throughout the 20th Century, the war industry has created the worse evil humanity has ever encountered: the business of conflicts and wars. It is
a business that has made trillions of dollars (American) and will continue to do so. It is the "mother of all evils" created by human beings. It has
no moral value, no understanding about Life, no respect for anyone or anything, no law except the ones that it makes for itself, and all its products are meant
to kill and destroy. It has sold its products to the enemies for the purpose of making more profit. It has subdued governments all over the world to make
them buy its products. It has given trade and way of doing business a bad reputation and, therefore, it is a threat to the establisment of business. Although the war industry has a good public image, it does not really matter who is the buyer as long as he pays good money. The proof of
this reality was easily verified by finding out what war products and equipment were being used by Iran, Irak, Afghanistan, and other
Middle East countries. Over 90% of all war products and equipment were made in the USA, Great Britain, Germany, France and Russia. Four out of five of these
countries are Permanent Members of the United Nations and that means they have almost a 100% control on any proposal submitted to the organization. The fifth Permanent Member missing here
is China. Shortly after the September 11 event, the UN Security Council has approved war against the people of Afghanistan. To get China to vote YES they gave China a membership in
the World Trade Organization(WTO).
ae) Terrorism must be stopped by using means other than war.
af) All religions are required to conduct positive actions for peace, join the Peace Movement of the Earth Community, and re-examine their scriptures, precepts, practices, ethical and moral values in light
of ecological concerns. The global community is facing a global environmental crisis. It is very important that every person on Earth accept of being
part of the process in protecting the global life-support systems. The ecological crisis is as much about saving children as it is about saving other
lifeforms on the planet. Our objective is to find statements from all religions that promote the respect, stewardship, protection, ethical and moral responsibility to life and of the environment, the Earth global
life-support systems, and statements that promote a responsible earth management. We are also asking for specific statements on environmental conservation such as those expressed by the Islamic religion.
ag) It has become a necessity to implement a total embargo on all US, Russian and European Union nations mass destruction chemicals, nuclear war heads, weapons, war products and war equipment.
These are the countries that have developed and manufactured the weapons of mass destruction. They are also the countries that have been exploiting the developing countries everywhere
in the world and especially in the Middle East, and without due respect to human rights and democracy. They are also the countries that have sold
weapons of mass destruction to the poor nations of the Middle East for the purpose of making a profit. The "war industry" throughout the world must be put to a complete halt and shelved forever from humanity. The Earth Community is asking
all peoples never again to buy there products. The war industry is the "Mother of all evils in the world". All persons working, directly or indirectly, for the war industry, are responsible and accountable to humanity and to God for
anything happening to their products after they are sold. Even here in Ontario, Canada, we manufacture weapons and war
products. Workers go home happy after a good day of work. They have to pay for their mortgages and make car payments
and others. They are mostly Christians. When they go to work, they leave their religious beliefs at home. Ethical and moral
values no longer touch them. They dont think that are actually responsible and accountable for spreading evil all around
the world. They think they are "good people", good citizens. Every single bullet you manufacture you are responsible and
accountable for it, all of you from the President of the company to the employee on the industrial line. Our Society holds
responsibility and accountability as well. And if that bullet happened to be a nuclear war head then it becomes even more imperative
to held the manufacturer and the people involved responsible and accountable. It is the same idea for any consumer product in any industry. You manufacture, produce, mine, farm or create a product, you become responsible
and accountable of your product from beginning to end (to the point where it actually becomes a waste; you are also
responsible for the proper disposable of the waste). If a person does anything consciously to damage or destroy
the life-support system of the Earth, the ecosystem, and if that person
creates or is involved directly or indirectly with conflicts or wars, the
Soul of that person is facing the Soul of Humanity. Right
now! That Soul is facing the Soul of Humanity right now where
all Souls are. God creates particles in places in the Universe, and there
is a need for a Soul to serve God in all of those new particles. There
is also a need to replace the Souls living in particles between the oldest
galaxies and have them come to Earth to taste life. These Souls have been
in those particles for more than fifteen billion years and yes, they will
be pleased to replace these old Souls on Earth who have gotten too fat for
their bellies (a figure of speech) and would rather not bother about the
Earth ecosystem and the survival of life on Earth. All Souls within
the mineral and plant domains on Earth will also be asked to move up to
a higher level, that of the lifeforms. This process has already started
a short while ago. In less than a generation a very large number of Souls
will be leaving Earth forever and new Souls eager to learn about life in
all forms will be replacing them. These new Souls will learn to manage
with the living. The merging of all Souls to form the Soul of Humanity may affect significantly this entire process.
God prohibits killing, and no exception at all ought to be made to the commandment that it is always wrong to kill. The sanctity of human life is unconditional.
A short while ago God, Allah, has spoken to humanity once more. The New Age Revelations are His Word. His Revelations are to be added to previous ones
revealed thousands of years ago. Together they are God's Word, and they will guide humanity for the thousands of
years to come. His Word reinforce His compassion and love for humanity and His care for all living inhabitants on Earth
and of Earth itself. God has said:
"Thou shall banish war as a solution to problems between communities. All Souls involved with war, directly or indirectly,
shall face the Soul of Humanity to be purified. All Souls involved in the making of weapons, war product and equipment
shall be facing the Soul of Humanity."
To be purified means a Soul loses all of its attributes as a Human Soul. Then the Soul will be asked to leave Earth forever and to serve God in a particle in the empty
space between the oldest galaxies of the Universe. There will be no interaction with an other particle. The Soul will never see the light again.
ah) The United Nations are to restructure their organization or start rebuilding it from scratch. The United Nations must reflect
the needs and aspirations of the New Age Civilization: all Peoples together, the Human Family, the Earth Community, the Global Community, Global Economic Cooperation,
Global Governance, Earth Governance, Earth Environmental Governance, and the Earth Government. It must become a democracy. Join the
Global Dialogue on Earth Management to be held on August 2002 in Toronto.
ai) Reforming the structure and voting system of the United Nations; the annulment of the special privileges of the Five Permanent Members, and the establishment of a voting system that give to each
nation one vote per million people.
Other recommendations related to UN:
1. Do away with the VETO vote of the Five Permanent Members.
2. Get corporations to participate in governing.
3. Make your position known and the UN make it known.
4. The UN has to stop being a pawn.
Earth needs urgently a world system of governance. The United Nations fail to satisfy the needs of the people of the 21st Century. They have
never improved upon the old ways and thinking of the middle of the 20th Century. Its voting system no longer satisfy the 6.157 billion people on Earth.
The challenges are different and require a world organization up for dealing with the needs of all these people.
During the past several years, the Earth Community has been pleading the United Nations leaders to make changes in the UN organizational structure and ways
of doing things. There has been an urgent need for fundamental changes in the United Nations organization. The world wants a true democratic
world organization. The UN is not! Should we start from scratch? No! There are a lot of good things within the UN, and they need to be protected.
The Earth Community is requesting that the United Nations change its voting system to have one vote per million people. This way the rich North will have to deal
with the poor in the South in order to obtain votes for decision-making. The eradication of poverty in the world will be achieved. Thousands of other good things will
be achieved.
The most fundamental requirement of a world organization is a democratic voting system. Democracy must be a priority.
The right that the greatest number of people has by virtue of its number (50% plus one) is a human right. It should be respected.
Surely, no one believes that organizations such as the European Union and the Free Trade Area of the Americas, or the like, are a substitute to a democracy. They are driven by profits only and are a form
of "world anti-government".
In the Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations, it says
"WE THE PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS " but in fact any of the five permanent members of the UN has the power to overthrow a
proposal brought forward by any member.
The Earth Community is proposing a voting system based on democracy: one vote per million people. In total there are 6104 votes. Taken apart the actual five permanent UN members would have
a total of 1810 votes i.e., less than 30% of the total number of votes of 6104 votes. A basic democracy requires a 50% plus one vote for
ruling.
The above calculations were counting all five permanent members together but in fact any of the five members has the power to overthrow a decision brought
forward by any of the 190 Member States of the United Nations. This means 1/190 or 0.5% of the membership
is more powerful than the remaining 99.5%. If that is not a dictatorship, what is it? It does not say much about democracy at the UN. More like a dictatorship of the five permanent members.
In actual fact, the general philosophy of the UN indicates that the more money a country has the more power that country has at the UN. Basically it is all about money.
The disrespect of democracy by the United Nations reflects on other worldwide organizations and their thinking with regard to Earth Management. For instance,
leaders of the 34 member nations of the Organization of American States (all the independent nations in North and South Americas
and the Caribbean, except Cuba) have met in Quebec City, Canada, to discuss hemispheric free trade which would eliminate trade
and investment barriers on goods and services between member countries by 2005. They proposed to create the
Free Trade Area of the Americas (FTAA) which
would represent the world’s largest common market. Again here profit is the goal to achieve at the expense of democracy. And that is a form of world 'anti-government'.
Hundreds of recommendations were proposed during this Global Dialogue. The OVERVIEW is very clear about them.
We
have already included most of the recommendations in the section above. If anyone feel they have been left out please let us know, and we will include your work.
There were several brain-storming exercises all over the world. As examples we include here two brain-storming exercises conducted at the physical site in Toronto.
POLAND
http://www.psl.org.pl/kte/
Chairman of the Sustainable Development Creators' Club
The Polish Federation for Life
kte@psl.org.pl
elmamba@poczta.onet.pl
To all people of good will!
We speak to you because we are concerned about the fate of the Human Race and of the Earth.
The World is in crisis.
We are exploiting our natural resources of minerals and fuels faster than we are gaining access to alternative sources. We are polluting the
natural environment and soil faster than the environment can regenerate itself to reach the level suitable for human needs. Depreciation
(devaluation) - moral degradation of the existing forms of living - is going on faster than new forms, consistent with new living conditions for
humans and for nature, are being introduced. This situation is complicated also due to demographic expansion, especially in those parts of the
human family that are lagging in their development.
This crisis results mainly in lack of adjustment of two dominating systems - the system of values and the economic system - to the
contemporary state of changes in the living conditions of humans and nature. These changes are proceeding very fast with the development of
science and technology.
At the same time, there is no absolute deficit of material resources (minerals, fuels, ecological resources). However there is a lack of
knowledge, technology, active intellectual potential and human conscience, and time - the factors that are necessary for limiting the futile
utilization of scarce resources, as well as for developing alternative sources, whilst the resources which are currently under exploitation are
being drained.
This crisis not only constitutes a serious hazard for everybody; it also constitutes an opportunity. This opportunity will occur if we carry out a
radical reconstruction of the mentality and social relations, which could create the possibility for sustainable development.
Currently two methods of overcoming the global crisis seem to be possible.
The first, traditional method is based on decreasing the number of consumers of the resources that are in deficit. This method represents a
pathology of social Darwinism - eco-fascism that leads to ecological holocaust of the weak, and subsequently - to the extinction of all humans.
The second method is based on the popularization of intellectual creative activity aimed at the common good and supported by science and high
technology. This would be an ecohumanistic method.
Ecohumanism is a partnership-based co-operation for the common good of all people (rich and poor, from countries highly
developed and behind in development), their descendants, and natural environment - commonly supported by science and high
technology.
The first, traditional method may seem effective only at first glance. Social Darwinism does not allow the elimination of the crisis-provoking
results of the moral degradation of the life forms that are not adapted to the new, quickly changing conditions.
The higher the level of development and the application of scientific and technological achievements, the faster is the pace of changes in living
conditions for people and nature. This implies a very large acceleration of moral degradation pace for diverse, previously well-functioning
forms of life. Moral degradation is as dangerous as the overexploitation of natural resources. This type of degradation, which is almost
invisible, only to an insignificant extent depends on the number of people. It is caused mainly by the development of science and technology.
This development cannot be stopped.
In order to eliminate the third factor of global crisis - the moral degradation of life forms, which in fact constitutes the basic factor - it is
necessary to undertake stability-oriented solutions, which are radically different from traditional solutions.
These are:
I - increasing far-sightedness and the flexibility of the methods of human activities,
II - supplementing calculations of the costs and benefits of social and economic activity with comprehensively assessed social and natural
components.
III - implementation of a system of stimulating ecohumanistic and intellectually creative activity and its popularization.
IV - increasing the intellectual potential of the human race (i.e. through popularization of the at least medium-level, comprehensive education
of the youth, what would ensure intellectual independence, responsibility and the ability to participate in the development of science and
technology).
This requires the further development of system dynamics - computer simulation methods for large-scale environmental and social (ecosocial)
systems, flexible automation of production, and development of information technology (teleinformatization). It is impossible to prepare the
appropriate economic statement without forecasting and a measurable assessment of comprehensive, broad in time and space, results of human
activities and of the other changes in living conditions of people and nature.
The information problem is a key issue in overcoming the global crisis and in the creation of possibilities for sustainable
development of the whole global society.
Both, contemporary and forecasted development of science and technology, especially of information technology, makes the possibility of a
significant increase of the level of cognizability of human activity results more real. However, we are not able to predict fully all life hazards.
Therefore, there is a necessity of the parallel development of flexible automation of production, advanced construction of diverse expert
information systems, data bases, and collection of other intellectual, scientific, and technological reserves that are indispensable for the quick
elimination of the hazards, which were impossible to predict in advance.
The second key problem is harnessing people's wealth to make it serve creative, innovative input to the common good. This is a potential for
releasing enormous intellectual creative activity, which is so indispensable for eliminating the deficits in material and spiritual life resources.
It is impossible to solve both of these key problems related to global crisis at the local level. Joint public activities are necessary, with support
from the world intellectual elite and powerful authorities.
Undoubtedly, for the development of the capability of forecasting and for a measurable assessment of the results of human activities, and for
appropriate stimulation of ecohumanistic and innovative, creative activity it would be helpful - and this is what we are proposing - to create a
World Center for a Strategy of Sustainable Development, under the auspices of the United Nations. This would be a professional center, for
large-scale scientific, technological and organizational operations (Apollo-type), based on subsidiarity principle. The main goal of this Center
would be to create information foundation of ecohumanism and sustainable development for the world society.
Its official establishment might take place in 2002, during the Special Session of General UN Assembly - "Rio+10".
The first task for the Center should be improvement and popularization of the methods for forecasting of the changes in conditions on Earth and
in local societies, as well as in the natural environment.
It is necessary to create urgently, as a priority, the information basis of ecohumanism and sustainable development in order to prevent the
development of eco-fascism and ecological holocaust of weaker parts of the human family that might lead to the ecological extinction of the
whole human race. Without creating the information foundation of activities for our common good, such effort will not be effective!
The Sustainable Development Creators' Club.
The Polish Federation for Life
This Appeal was published inter alia in:
- “Zielone Brygady”, nr 4(149)/2000, 16-29.2.2000
- „Polish Academy of Sciences, Dialogue and Universalism, Metaphilosophy as the Wisdom of Science, Art and Life”, no. 4-5/2002.
mail to: kte@psl.org.pl
Brain-storming exercise held at the Toronto site.
Participants during exercise: Jitka Jarolimek, Michael Breton, Michael Lenhardt, Germain Dufour
How does the UN achieve the power to govern its members?
1. It does not have power right now.
Recommendations:
2. No unbiase investigation.
3. Do away with the VETO vote of the Five Permanent Members.
4. Get corporations to participate in governing.
5. Let corporations to vote during UN meetings.
6. It cannot achieve its power.
7. Some nations dont care.
8. Self-interest is a factor in caring.
9. The UN has to stop being a pawn.
10. It is a barometer of what world nation leaders believe.
11. The UN has power by influencing public opinion.
12. It is up to its members to agree on small things.
13. Even a small nation without VETO power can manipulate the UN.
14. Make your position known and the UN make it known.
15. Each nation does what it wants when it comes to Kyoto Protocol (self-interests).
16. Let corporations bring up new ideas, money, to help governing (give corporations economic incentives to be GREEN).
17. The UN should be abolished.
1. Do away with the VETO vote of the Five Permanent Members.
2. Get corporations to participate in governing.
3. Make your position known and the UN make it known.
4. The UN has to stop being a pawn.
Brain-storming exercise during Global Dialogue 2002 in Toronto
Participants: Mrs. Kuri Jayafure, Mrs. Alka Karir, Textile designer, Ms. Tamara Sanchez and Germain Dufour
Title: Formation of a Global Ministry of Environmental Health.
1. Must be non-profit, grassroots, and at community level.
2. Finances: drug companies and governments.
3. Global Declaration
a) very strict and mandatory
b) all nations participate
c) scientists and professionals in the fields who have dedicated their lives to environmental health
d) humanitarians
4. Manifesto
a) Self-sustainable society or NGO focusing on environment and health
b) Global market should not deplete natural resources
c) cut down in pollution
d) Reassessing American culture, consumerism in America
e) Consumer responsibilities and accountabilities
f) Environmental health costs
g) Cost on the environment
h) Prices should reflect environmental cost
i) Recycling whenever possible
j) Reducing
k) Each nation should see that they are sustainable communities before exporting
l) Taking on a nation's problem at the roots level (if a deisease exist there then the nation should address that issue)
m) ECO should help manage getting rid of that disease
n) Make use of traditional methods to solve problems
o) Use natural ways to put in the environment when solving problems
Recommendations:
The recommendations are now a part of http://globalcommunitywebnet.com/gdufour/Recommendations2002.htm
This is section in F1.
1. Must be non-profit, grassroots, and at community level.
2. Finances: drug companies and governments.
3. Global Declaration
a) very strict and mandatory
b) all nations participate
c) scientists and professionals in the fields who have dedicated their lives to environmental health
d) humanitarians
4. The functioning of the NGO is as per Manifesto.
Recommendations of Global Dialogue 2000
* living with the
empowerment of free-thought, creativity
* taking charge of our lives
* planning for our own future
The complete definition of Sustainable Development was researched and developed
along with a method of measurement. The technical definition of Sustainable Development was given as being:
"a sound balance among the interactions of the impacts (positive and/or negative), or stresses, on the four major quality systems: People, Economic Development, Environment and Availability of Resources."
The non-technical definition was given as being:
"a sound balance among the interactions designed to create a healthy economic growth, preserve environmental quality, make wise use of our resources, and enhance social benefits."
Two indicators local/global indicators were developed to measure
sustainable development. The Gross Environmental Sustainable Development
Indicator (GESDI) and the Gross Sustainable Development Product (GSDP). The GSDP is defined as the total value of production within a region over a specified period of time.
Measurements of GESDI and GSDP provide insights for the discussion of issues such as :
1. It offers a just mechanism to discourage excessive financial speculation in general, and, in particular, one specific type of highly-undesirable financial speculation, namely that of massive currency speculation that can trigger a currency crisis, with all its negative social effects. As such, it indirectly promotes development to be sustainable.
2. Such a tax instrument would generate revenue that could be used as one possible source of finance to help meet some of the world's global economic and political challenges, such as the promotion of adequate social development in poor countries, in other words, promote sustainable development directly. Therefore, it would secure not only the financing of necessary investment in safety nets to cure current negative social effects, but would also, and more importantly, reduce the vulnerability of the poor to the detrimental effects of possible future crises. Moreover, the successful implementation of an international financial transaction tax could act as a precedent in favour of intervention (including international taxation) with respect to other global public goods.
So far, our analysis has led to a proposal that can generate, in a sustainable way, an additional source of revenue of roughly $ 30 billion, to be spent globally for sustainable development purposes, next to the funds generated and used domestically.
This World Congress is about finding universal values that are very important to the survival of life on Earth. Should people in a Third World Country have different Human Rights than others? One of the very important Global Community
concepts of this World Congress is about asking everyone to be a responsible human being. If we are all responsible in the management of Earth than everyone should have the right to breathe clean air and drink fresh water. Noone individual (an 'individual' was defined in the Vision of earth in Year 2024 as being either a person, a corporation, a NGO, a local community, businesses, a nation or a government) should be allowed to control and profit from a basic Human Right such as drinking water. Noone individual should be allowed to pollute Earth. Even tough this may look like an impossible task
we still have to find in our heart and mind what is right and show the direction to take and propose the concepts to The Global Community.
Fresh water resources and clean air are at least if not more important to every human being than any other human rights ever listed in any charter of any society. If there was a scale of values to be drawn where would you insert these two human rights?
39. Globalization vs The
Global Community concepts
* poverty increases world-wide
~ entire countries in a state of starvation
* environmental degradation
* national interests of a country
changing and becoming more trade oriented and trying to go with the wave
of global trade
* international interests of a
country take prime importance
* in developing countries, national
debts constrict the institutions of the national state and contribute to
the destruction of the economic activity which, in turn, as the effect
of creating unemployment
* national currencies of many
countries are affected by national debts and contribute in destroying social
life, creating ethnic conflicts and civil wars
* the large corporation is becoming
larger and getting more power and control falls into the hands of a few
people
* globalization is another way of keeping
control on our lives in the hands of a few people
* with globalization, we have
no control and no say in our future and the world becomes a game played
by a few people just as it has alway been through history, leading to revolutions
and war
* with globalization there is no sense
of direction and meaning, no security for the individual, just a few people
getting richer and controlling us all
* Saving one's own country from becoming an uninhabitable
place
* Stopping the planet from becoming an uninhabitable
place
* people have the right to food
* children have the right to be educated
* the world has a right to clean healthy fields,
streams, meadows and mountains, water and breathable air
* resources can be helped to last indefinitely
* Saving one's own country from becoming an uninhabitable
place
* Stopping the planet from becoming an uninhabitable
place
* people have the right to food
* children have the right to be educated
* the world has a right to clean healthy fields,
streams, meadows and mountains, water and breathable air
* resources can be helped to last indefinitely