Note:
This is a follow-up to a previous letter sent to you over the months before your re-election as President of the United States of America (see References Section). The following short list shows the work done so far by Global Community concerning the dirty tar sands oil of Alberta, Canada.


Short list of previous articles and papers on Energy and the protection of the global life-support systems
Work done from January 2012 to June 2013
Work done from 1985 to December 2011

Introduction

Seismic waves are the vibrations from earthquakes that travel through the Earth; they are recorded on instruments called seismographs. Seismographs record a zig-zag trace that shows the varying amplitude of ground oscillations beneath the instrument. The Richter magnitude scale was developed in 1935 by Charles F. Richter of the California Institute of Technology as a mathematical device to compare the size of earthquakes. The magnitude of an earthquake is determined from the logarithm of the amplitude of waves recorded by seismographs. The Richter Scale is not used to express damage. An earthquake in a densely populated area which results in many deaths and considerable damage may have the same magnitude as a shock in a remote area that does nothing more than frighten the wildlife. Large-magnitude earthquakes that occur beneath the oceans may not even be felt by humans. An earthquake's destructive power varies depending on the composition of the ground in an area and the design and placement of man-made structures. The extent of damage is rated on the Mercalli scale. Mercalli ratings, which are given as Roman numerals, are based on largely subjective interpretations. A low intensity earthquake, one in which only some people feel the vibration and there is no significant property damage, is rated as a II. The highest rating, a XII, is applied to earthquakes in which structures are destroyed, the ground is cracked and other natural disasters, such as landslides or tsunamis, are initiated. Richter scale ratings are determined soon after an earthquake, once scientists can compare the data from different seismograph stations. Mercalli ratings, on the other hand, can't be determined until investigators have had time to talk to many eyewitnesses to find out what occurred during the earthquake. Once they have a good idea of the range of damage, they use the Mercalli criteria to decide on an appropriate rating The biggest quake in recorded history was the 9.5 quake that struck Chile in 1960. It killed nearly 1,900 people and caused about $4 billion in damage in 2010 dollars. Generally, you won't see much damage from earthquakes that register below 4 on the Richter scale.

Now let me explain where I am going with the above description of measuring an earthquake. Global Community has developed a mean to measure the amount of destruction cause by human activities. Not by Nature! But by human activities! Why is that important? It is important because there are human activities going on in every part of the world. And the world, our planet, can only be pushed to its limits by so much destruction before everyone on the planet suffer extinction. Life extinction! So Global Community has proposed a way to measure human activities of all types and show how important and destructive consequences may be. Global Community already has researched and developed the Scale of Global Rights for people to live by. The Scale tells you what is the most important, and what is the least important for the survival of our species. By accepting the Scale as our first principle, many activities would not be conducted as we would know their destructive effects. Well! That is the idea!

We applied here the above principle and conducted measurements on the actual consequences of the Syrian uprising which started late January of 2011 and the activitiy concerning the production, transportation and burning of the dirty tar sands oil of Alberta, Canada. Of course we deal here with actual facts and events and not on what people are saying in the Media.

We define here a "terrarist" to Global Community as being a person, a group of persons, a business, a government, or an organization that by their activities have had a significant destructive effect on the global life-support systems. This is where the above measurement of the effects and activities come to be useful. For instance, a person such as Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations, is a terrarist because of his position as a leader with significant powers over the world and has given hope to a small group of people, also terrarists, who started the Syrian uprising with significant consequences and destruction. A business is called a terrarist business when its activities can bring about signifiant destruction to the global life-support systems. A typical example is of course the businesses listed in this article and involved with the production of the dirty tar sands oil of Alberta, Canada.

Other very obvious activities that qualify as terrarism against Global Community are: economic warfare, population warfare and military warfare. All three aspects have been defined more specifically in July 2010 Newsletter.

Historical events

Soviet President Mikhail Gorbachev ended the Cold War in 1991 because of the economy of his nation was suffering from the unsatisfying appetite of the military. He had the guts to end the Cold War to save his people from a nuclear war. A leader of Peace and Harmony! Why have the United States not followed his leadership in creating an open and safe world?

If America had followed his leadership the American economy would not have been bankcrupted today.

Now America wants Russia out of Syria. Americans are still at it again: pushing, manipulating, invading. All about showing off and wanting to control. You truly have no right to change a political system of a nation just because you dont like it. In Iraq, you called rebels "insurgents." In Pakistan and Afghanistan, you called rebels Talibans. Since WWII you have been involved in many nations to either kill and bomb rebels and their communities, or you help rebels with arms so they do the work for you against a government you did not like anymore. In Iraq and Afghanistan you have bombed the place so much and killed at least a million people, committed genocide ten times over, and got those nations back to stone age. All under the United Nations approval! No questions asked! And no American President ever got taken to the International Court of Justice for crimes against humanity. Was the Court bias? Obviously the United Nations is an organization promoting and subsidizing conflicts and wars. Recently, this was shown very clearly at the begining of the the Syrian uprising which started late January of 2011, calling for the resignation of their President Bashar-al-Assad and an end to Ba'ath Party rule. Heavy armament were supplied to the terrarists heavy enough to shut down jet planes and helicopters, and conduct continuous and offensive attacks to the government.

How did that happen?

Historically, a small group of people deciding to do what everyone else have been doing in that part of the world: "lets get rid of the government". And let us ask the United States to help us. A bunch of terrarists who just wanted to create trouble and get help from the West to achieve their goals. Of course the United Nations jumped also on this bandwagon and sided with the terrarists. And we all know what happened next. More conflicts! Civil war! Refugees crisis! More than 2.5 million Syrians have fled their homes. More than 100,000 casualties. Destruction so bad the country is now back to stone age! That is the work of the United Nations giving hope to a bunch of terrarists claiming they dont like their government anymore. And again, of course, following the lead of Ban Ki-moon, Secretary-General of the United Nations, other nations interested in selling arms to the terrarists i.e. Great Britain, France and the United States, were just waiting the best time to do so. Because Syria is a friend of Russia, the U.S.A., Great britain and France saw the opportunity of a much larger conflict implying a lot of destruction, killing, and selling of more arms. Selling arms is very good for their economies which they poorly managed over the past decades.

It is very likely that, in the near future, if more arms are supplied to the terrarists, President Obama, British Prime Minister David Cameron, and Ban Ki-moon will be added to Global Community list of criminals making money from the promotion of hate in the world. Let the Earth Court of Global Rights and Justice decide on their fate. They are responsible for genocides and the destruction of the global life-support systems.

Remember Vietnam? The Vietnam War was a Cold War-era military conflict that occurred in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia. America attacked the place. America has tried to invade the place. To these days no one really knows why America has tried to invade the place. I sure dont! Was it because America did not like their political system, communism? Was it because Americans enjoy killing, bombing communities, destroying, and showing off military warfare? Was it because it made good economic sense? Americans must have killed over a million people. What a bloodshed! Back in America, Americans were told we were killing the bad guys, the communists. That was all what was needed to do the killing. No other reason! Are Americans so gullible they would believe anything coming from the White House? Can they not see how wrong invading Vietnam was? Dont they have values, principles or even religious beliefs they live by to help making a sound judgment about the invasion?

The American military troops were the self proclaimed heroes. And to these days the International Court of Justice never got a President to stand in Court for the genocide Americans have committed during the Vietnam war. Was the Court bias? As if nothing had happened! America was right and the other guys were communits! The irony of it all is that today communists own America. China bought America with hard earned money! Low salary and hard earned money. They have an economic system that asks someone to do work to earn a living. And somehow they manage to buy America. At least the U.S.A. will have to give China the State of Texas with all its resources to pay for their debt to China. At the least! We should ask Governor Rick Perry and Texas's Senators Kay Bailey Hutchison and John Cornyn what they would think of giving away the State of Texas to China to pay for America's debt. They are truly Americans but would they want to let go Texas to save America? We all have to make sacrifices. Of course the White House Administration would relocate every single American from Texas to elswhere. The Arizona desert might be a good place for all Texans. The Sonoran Desert, an area of 120,000 sq mi., might be just what is needed. Eventually, global warming will make the desert so hot you would not have even have a need for a stove for cooking. So that will save taxpayers money. After all, the burning of Texas oil caused the global warming of the planet so it is only fair Texans suffer hell in the desert.

And then we would follow China's lead about creating a proper economic system in America. Communism might not be a bad idea! Texans will have to work to make a living. What a change! But then Sir, you were elected as President of the United States on the promise of making changes.

The U.S.A. military is no replacement to the "will of the people," democracy, the rule of law, social justice, and to Global Rights and Global Justice. Global Community is right by demanding the end of subversive military forces such as the United States military and NATO.

The U.S.A. military has created a link in 737-strong chain of American military bases in 130 countries, mainly to control and aquire resources of those countries either by economic walfare or military warfare. The USA military is everywhere to invade, destroy, kill, corrupt governments, and de-stabilize the world for profit. The more unstable the world is the better.

What would the U.S.A. military do without conflicts and wars? They create them, and that is what they do best. Of course! No way out of that! They cannot be inactive!

Global Community has proposed to stop the fuelling and the manufacturing of by-products from the dirty tar sands oil because it is being used by the war machine, the war industry and the U.S.A. military. To stop production of the dirty tar sands oil of Alberta and its tranportation through pipelines to U.S.A. facilities would be suicidal for the military. The U.S.A. military is totally powerless without enough barrels of oil to hold on to. The U.S.A military needs the dirty tar sands oil of Alberta more than they need drugs from the Mexican drug cartel. Well I am not entirely sure about that. But look! Those who buy the drugs are those who actually make money to pay for them. I am saying here that those working in the oil field and the military and its war machine have most of the money and, therefore, are more likely to be buying hard drugs.

So if we stop production of the dirty tar sands oil the effect will be to:

a) stop the buying of drugs from the Mexican drug cartel; note that the F.B.I. and Home Land Security probably know that but are not likely to tell anyone.

b) bring Global Peace on planet Earth.