The Federation of Global Governments vs the United Nations (UN) organization
The history of the Global Community organization, Earth Government, and the Federation of Global Governments is well known. Part of the period from 1985 to 1988 has been covered in an article. The period stretching from 1988 to today has been covered in several Newsletters.
The history of the United Nations (UN) is well known. In this paper we will compare those two organizations over time.
The Global Community is very concerned about the state of the world today and the causes that brought up so much frictions and wars between nations. Ever since WWII, the world has seen the rise of an invading world power, the USA. The United Nations has never done anything to stop the invasion. The United Nations (UN) leadership has been one of a 'watcher', an observer. The UN watch the world go by, on the brink of self-destruction and of being invaded, environmentally and militarily, and you do nothing. The United Nations, US Administration, World Bank and IMF are corrupted organizations and never to be trusted of anything. The Global Community will never go along with these organizations, and EU President-in-Office Sarkozy, concerning any economic recovery they have created for themselves.
In order to solve the global financial problem, a workable type of Tobin tax should be in place as it is a powerful instrument to promote global sustainability and force shareholders to be responsible and accountable to the people of global communities. A Tobin tax is a tax on all trade of currency across borders to put a penalty on short-term speculation in currencies. The tax rate should be 10 to 25 cents per hundred dollars.
The proposal is important due to its potential to prevent global financial crises such as we are seeing now. Also, an estimated $500 billion per year makes it possible to meet urgent global priorities, such as preventing global warming, disease, and unemployment. The tax should be managed by the Global Community and the Federation of Global Governments. In the globalized economy, there is a lack of adequate funding for global problems which threaten local communities worldwide. Projects which could help to address these needs and create jobs will cost more than $500 billion annually. Private donors do not meet the need, and some nations cut their aid budgets. New multilateral approaches to public finance, such as Tobin Taxes, may provide part of the answer.
The last thing we would want is that this money be managed by the United Nations following the formation of some sort of new Economic Council of the UN. The UN is a corrupted organization and has been ever since its creation. Every past decisions made by the UN had to be approved by the five Permanent Members. And that is not acceptable. Over its history the UN has made decisions that are the causes of the planetary state of emergency the world is facing today. The problem is the organization itself, the way it was created, and the many loopholes for corruption at all levels, especially at the highest levels. The US White House was the main initiator and promoter for the formation of the UN. Over the past decades we have seen the US Administration bullying the UN membership to get what it wants. The latest one of those 'US want's we are seeing today has been the premeditated and illegal invasion of Iraq to acquire and control its oil and gas resources. Over one and half million Iraquis were killed and the nation destroyed. We have seen a beast of the worst kind at work. And the UN gave America its approval for the invasion. The UN claims to be the defender of human rights but that is 90% a farce. You dont allow over one and half million Iraquis be killed and get away with it. You have to stand up firmly for the protection of a nation and all its people. NATO is in charge they say on behalf of the UN. But the White House is also running NATO. Corruption and the mindless destruction of our planet are everywhere. The White House has over a thousand military bases spread over the world all aimed at destruction and de-stabilizing nations to acquire their resources. The beast is in charge and must be controlled.
It has become clear that this culture of war, waste, mismanagement and corruption cannot reform itself. The UN cannot be reformed. It must be replaced by the Federation of Global Governments. So the money cannot and should not be managed by the UN. We must first let go the UN and form the Federation, but this time we will do it right. The $500 billion per year tax should be managed by the Global Community and the Federation of Global Governments, and not by a failed and corrupted organization, the United Nations.
When has the UN ever taken side of those nations being invaded? The UN never did!
When has the UN ever stood up for the principles in the UN Charter and stopped the invaders, and at least enforced hard sanctions against the invaders? The UN never did!
The UN has been a watcher, an observer, a non-participant. And that is a crime against humanity.
The UN should never be promoting war as a solution to world problems. That alone is against global sustainability. Sustainability means no war. War is the greatest act of destruction. There is no worst action than war.
The UN is promoting a culture of violence and war, and certainly that goes against Global Sustainability and Global Peace. That is the worst thing the UN could ever to humanity. It is totally opposite to the Global Vision that the Global Community is promoting. And it is totally insane!
Since its creation in 1947, Israel has been used by successive US Administrations as the Trojan Horse for the invasion of the Middle East. This is when the American invasion of the Middle East was deliberately started by the White House. A well planned strategic military invasion to plunder the resources of an other nation! Blood oil and gas! The UN had no right to create the State of Israel. They forced their way into over one billion Muslims and Arabs and have done ever since.
The UN knew America was invading the Middle East. Why has the UN not enforced hard sanctions against the USA for its bullying tactics at the UN to get what it wants? The UN leadership could have avoided the situation we have today. The UN did nothing at a critical time. The UN watched things happening. The UN is the organization where bullying takes place by those with nuclear war heads. The world is threatened by nuclear war heads. The five permanents members of the UN are allowed to bully any other nations. The USA is invading the world, and the UN can do nothing to stop them. The USA is allowed to invade other nations, change their governments, and has often made lies in speeches to the UN, to the world.
The leadership of the United Nations has failed to enforce disarmement. All weapons of mass destruction should have been phased out a long time ago. Why are the USA still holding the world hostage with its 40,000 nuclear war heads, and biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction? What has the UN ever done to help the phasing out of WMDs? Now several nations, including North Korea and Iran feel threatened just like everyone else and will refuse to be invaded. They would rather take on the US. Russia and China will also refuse to be invaded. The UN has done nothing to phase out WMDs.
Certainly we ought to disarm all nations from all weapons of mass destruction.
The UN never applied hard sanctions against the US actions in the North. We know the US military has used nuclear war heads to melt the polar ice but the UN never even mentioned this important factor during the last Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Why?! And why have they not mentioned nuclear war heads explosions in our oceans? Ever since WWII several nations have acquired the US nuclear technology and know how, have been trained by US experts, and exploded nuclear war heads in our oceans. Truly, over time, these explosions have caused major destruction of life in our oceans! They have also caused physical and chemical disturbances strong enough to change the natural balance of water systems at the origin of climate change. Again why were these important factors not mentioned by IPCC? I am a scientist myself but when I see the destruction of our planet by the military, then I stand up for values, for what it is right not just for myself but for all life on the planet. And so should you!
The Global Community stands firm on wanting to replace the United Nations with the Federation of Global Governments. The following table shows major differences between both organizations.
Federation of Global Governments vs United Nations
Postal address: 186 Bowlsby Street, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada V9R 5K1
Electronic mail: email@example.com