| |
The concept of Sustainable Development was presented for the first time in
1987 by the World Commission on Environment and Development, in the report
Our Common Future . The commission was created by the United Nations, and
was made of 21 nations, including Canada. The commission, headed by
Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland, said that the planet needs " a
new era of environmentally sustainable sound economic development". Dr.
Brundtland also said that government must strongly support "a new political
approach to environment and development, where economic and fiscal policies,
trade and foreign policies, energy, agriculture, industry, and other sectorial
policies, all aim to induce development that is not only economically but
ecologically sustainable."
The complete definition of Sustainable Development was researched and
developed along with a method of measurement. The technical definition of
Sustainable Development was given as being:
"a sound balance among the interactions of the impacts (positive and/or
negative), or stresses, on the four major quality systems: People, Economic
Development, Environment and Availability of Resources."
The non-technical definition was given as being:
"a sound balance among the interactions designed to create a healthy economic
growth, preserve environmental quality, make wise use of our resources, and
enhance social benefits."
Two indicators local/global indicators were developed to measure sustainable
development. The Gross Environmental Sustainable Development Indicator
(GESDI) and the Gross Sustainable Development Product (GSDP). The GSDP is
defined as the total value of production within a region over a specified period of
time.
The measurement of GSDP gives a proper and sound signal to the public,
government and industry about the rate and direction of economic growth; it
identifies environmental, health, and social quality; it identifies sustainable and
unsustainable levels of resource and environmental uses; it measures the success
or failure of sustainable development policies and practices; and it identifies
resource scarcity. Values obtained enable us to make meaningful comparisons of
sustainable development between cities, provinces, nations over the entire planet.
The world population is becoming more urban. It is the quality of the urban
environment and its well-being that constitutes a challenge to any society. Cities
are the centres of economic and cultural life of a nation's population. The public
wants government expenditures to be directed to areas such as urban
development, health, housing, education, crime prevention, recreation,
environmental pollution control, waste management, aesthetic satisfaction,
well-being and many others. It is important to have social indicators that can tell
us about the quality and costs of essential elements such as: educational and
cultural facilities, suitable community facilities and services, proper shelter,
family life, security from crime, efficient and environmentally conscious
transportation, social justice, aesthetic satisfaction, and minority status. GESDI
can be obtained for all quality indicators that are difficult to give a money value
to. Both the GESDI and GSDP are measured together and tell us about the
quality and cost of development, locally and globally.
We now have a way of dealing with globalization: global ethics. In the past,
corporation’s rule without checks and balances. For now on there will be checks
and balances. Our judgement will be based on global ethics. Global ethics must
always be grounded in realities. But realities are changing constantly and are
different in different places. We live in a world that makes progress toward
democracy. Ethics and morality exist only when human beings can act freely. In
our free society, rights are tied to responsibilities. Corporations are committed to
improvement in business performance and want to be seen as 'good corporate
citizens' on a local and a global scale. Corporations have social responsibilities
as they are an integral part of society. Global ethics recalls that those realities, on
which others build upon, have to be protected first. A classical example is, that to
the stewardship of the ecological base (the base of life) has to be given priority
before the fulfillment of various economic and social wishes. Demands resulting
from the social system of a particular country have to find their limits in the
protection of the global ecosystem or the aim of maximization of labour
productivity in agriculture and forestry should not be realised at the expense of
biodiversity landscapes.
Vital interests of future generations have to be
considered as having priority before less vital interests of the present generation.
Typical examples are climate change, fresh water, clean air and soil erosion.
Supply chains have to be designed in a way, that the goods can enter after usage
or consumption into natural or industrial recycling processes. If serious damages
to persons, animals, plants and the ecosystem cannot be excluded, an action or
pattern of behaviour should be refrained from. A striking example is the use of
negotiations and community principles to resolve conflicts in other countries.
Never use armed intervention to resolve a conflict. Never go to war.
A measure
for supplying goods or services should choose a path which entails the least
possible impact on the ecological and social system concerned. This way
functioning proven systems will not be disturbed, and unnecessary risks will not
be taken. The Polluter Pays Principle applies to all with no exception. Supply
strategies consuming less resources should have preference before those
enhancing more resource consumption. Strategies, which violate human dignity,
should not be permitted. Examples are the expulsion of an indigenous population
by the flooding of a valley for a hydroelectric power plant.
Earth Government has now at hand the method and
framework to conduct societal checks and balances of sustainable
development. A more balance world economy will result of annual checks and
balances. Corporations will take their social responsibilities and become involved
in designing, monitoring, and implementing these checks and balances. Several
corporations have already done so. Results will be taken into account in the
evaluation of sustainable development. Corporations are required to expand their
responsibilities to include human rights, the environment, community and family
aspects, safe working conditions, fair wages and sustainable consumption aspects.
Earth Government has extended the idea of sustainability to be
a moral and ethical state, as well as an economic and environmental state,
wherein sustainable consumption patterns respect the universal values of peace,
security, justice and equity within the human relationships that exist in the global
community. When there is a need to find a solution to a problem or a concern, a
sound solution would be to choose a measure, if possible, which causes
reversible damage as oppose to a measure causing an irreversible loss.
|